Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Wow to the other posts. This is DC, where it is a rite of passage for every woman to marry in her 30s and have kids in 30s and 40s. Maybe the pps are from out of the area?
As for me, I met my DH at 34 and was married at 35. He was 36/37. Married over 20 years.
I’m the PP who married at 25. Born and raised in the DMV. And no I’m not a SAHM. Went to a T14 and practice in Big Law.
I’m the one above you from DC. Also have always worked/had a career. I’m a Fed.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Wow to the other posts. This is DC, where it is a rite of passage for every woman to marry in her 30s and have kids in 30s and 40s. Maybe the pps are from out of the area?
As for me, I met my DH at 34 and was married at 35. He was 36/37. Married over 20 years.
I think it might be something of selection bias. If you meet very young, you are more likely to contribute than if you think I'm just like everyone else.
This. Women ( primary contributors to DCUM) have a tendency to think meeting and marrying young is an accomplishment they got chose so they are more likely to answer at the same time, women tend to think marring late is something to be ashamed of do less likely to answer.
Why would anyone be ashamed of being single? It’s bad luck, not a personal flaw.
Anonymous wrote:Met: first week of college when we were 18
Engaged:28
Married: 29
Pregnant with first child now and we'll both be 35 when they're born.