Anonymous wrote:Sounds like being a "military kid" has its privileges with respect to in-state tuition eligibility:
Where Military Dependents Receive In-State Tuition
The good news is, your military children getting ready to go to college do have some options, even more than civilian kids do when it comes to paying in-state tuition rates. You could say that military children are at an advantage here.
The first thing to keep in mind is that a studentās residence does depend on their parents. If any parent of a college-age student is a resident of Virginia, their kids could go to schools in Virginia and pay the in-state tuition. If a civilian family then moved to Florida, it would take a year for them to establish residency in the new state. Their children couldnāt just start at a college in Florida and then start paying in-state tuition right away.
Different Qualifications For Military Families
For military families, this is a bit different. Military students are not only eligible for in-state tuition where they have been living with their parents but also where their active duty parentās state of legal residence or domicile is. Different states do have different requirements so that is also something to keep in mind.
Because of the Higher Education Opportunity Act of 2008, states need to offer in-state tuition to military family members who live in the state due to their active duty military service. This means that for any active duty service member, his or her spouse and dependents at any public college or university where they are stationed for 30+ days should be able to receive the in-state tuition rate. States do need to accept certain types of federal funding for this to qualify.
What if Military Parent is Then Stationed Somewhere Else?
Military family members can then continue using the in-state tuition rate as long as they are continuously enrolled in the school, even if their mom or dad gets stationed somewhere else. That means that if a child starts college in Virginia, getting the in-state tuition because their dad is stationed there, they can stay at that college with the in-state tuition even if dad gets stationed in another state during their college years. They could also transfer to a school in the same state that their parents move to and qualify for in-state there, instead of having to wait.
This gives the military child options and avoids the worry that a parent could get orders during their college years, making college more expensive to pay for. This also allows a military child to think about going to school in their parentās home of record, which could be closer to other family members or even where the parents plan to end up after military life is over.
In addition to all of this, some schools offer in-state tuition to those who are using a transferred GI Bill. So, even if your child canāt receive in-state tuition somewhere, they might be able to do this if you have transferred your GI Bill to them.
Anonymous wrote:Sounds like being a "military kid" has its privileges with respect to in-state tuition eligibility:
Where Military Dependents Receive In-State Tuition
The good news is, your military children getting ready to go to college do have some options, even more than civilian kids do when it comes to paying in-state tuition rates. You could say that military children are at an advantage here.
The first thing to keep in mind is that a studentās residence does depend on their parents. If any parent of a college-age student is a resident of Virginia, their kids could go to schools in Virginia and pay the in-state tuition. If a civilian family then moved to Florida, it would take a year for them to establish residency in the new state. Their children couldnāt just start at a college in Florida and then start paying in-state tuition right away.
Different Qualifications For Military Families
For military families, this is a bit different. Military students are not only eligible for in-state tuition where they have been living with their parents but also where their active duty parentās state of legal residence or domicile is. Different states do have different requirements so that is also something to keep in mind.
Because of the Higher Education Opportunity Act of 2008, states need to offer in-state tuition to military family members who live in the state due to their active duty military service. This means that for any active duty service member, his or her spouse and dependents at any public college or university where they are stationed for 30+ days should be able to receive the in-state tuition rate. States do need to accept certain types of federal funding for this to qualify.
What if Military Parent is Then Stationed Somewhere Else?
Military family members can then continue using the in-state tuition rate as long as they are continuously enrolled in the school, even if their mom or dad gets stationed somewhere else. That means that if a child starts college in Virginia, getting the in-state tuition because their dad is stationed there, they can stay at that college with the in-state tuition even if dad gets stationed in another state during their college years. They could also transfer to a school in the same state that their parents move to and qualify for in-state there, instead of having to wait.
This gives the military child options and avoids the worry that a parent could get orders during their college years, making college more expensive to pay for. This also allows a military child to think about going to school in their parentās home of record, which could be closer to other family members or even where the parents plan to end up after military life is over.
In addition to all of this, some schools offer in-state tuition to those who are using a transferred GI Bill. So, even if your child canāt receive in-state tuition somewhere, they might be able to do this if you have transferred your GI Bill to them.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The Federalist? Totally a legit news source. Freak OP
Bet you quote The Atlantic as legit.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The Federalist? Totally a legit news source. Freak OP
Confirmed by FCPS, someone else linked too the FCPS tweet backing off on it.
Anonymous wrote:The Federalist? Totally a legit news source. Freak OP
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The military kids in Oakton are likely to be children of officers.Anonymous wrote:I saw this elsewhere but wasnāt sure it was true. Why is being a military kid privileged???
Also how do you win? The person who covers the most squares? What is the assumption here that only white lids grow up in stable 2 parent homes with college educated parents who go to work? This is example of why I donāt back any of the CRT type lessons. They are so bizarre and random but white democrats love it bc it makes them feel woke. Imagine being the non white kids during these classes?
If better more accurate history books are needed, the. get those but skip these nonsense lessons.
And college is basically taken care of for them. That's huge.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Why is it bad to teach the fact that many parents of children of color teach their teenagers how to be super careful if they get pulled over by a cop? I have not had to teach my kid to be over cautious, but she is aware her friendās brother can be in danger if pulled over for a minor infraction. I see these types of lessons only as eye-openers to realities some students are unawere of. They should not make āprivilegedā kids feel bad. They should just help them realize they may not encounter as many obstacles in their lives.
Have you ever seen interviews of white teenagers saying they have never seen any racist stuff going on at their schools? They usually say, āNoā. Then, the camera turns around and asks some POC the same question. Totally different answer.
You are very naive if you think you don't need to teach white teenagers to be careful in their interactions with police. I lived in a majority white neighborhood and knew a white teenage girl the cops pulled out of the driver's side window because she was nervous and moved too quickly for the glove compartment.
Anonymous wrote:The Federalist? Totally a legit news source. Freak OP
Anonymous wrote:Why is it bad to teach the fact that many parents of children of color teach their teenagers how to be super careful if they get pulled over by a cop? I have not had to teach my kid to be over cautious, but she is aware her friendās brother can be in danger if pulled over for a minor infraction. I see these types of lessons only as eye-openers to realities some students are unawere of. They should not make āprivilegedā kids feel bad. They should just help them realize they may not encounter as many obstacles in their lives.
Have you ever seen interviews of white teenagers saying they have never seen any racist stuff going on at their schools? They usually say, āNoā. Then, the camera turns around and asks some POC the same question. Totally different answer.