Anonymous wrote:I don't what you're alluding to. Please explain.
I can tell you that there's growing concern in the hs parent community about inter-connected issues: inadequate teacher pay, what looks like a higher drop off rate to Walls than in the past, unimpressive hs ecs as compared to ms ecs and this year's somewhat disappointing admissions results.
In the last few years, hs parents grew accustomed to seeing ivy admits, mainly for Yale, Harvard and Princeton. It's not lost on us that Walls and JR had ivy successes this year, and not just for low SES minority applicants or recruited athletes (mostly from the JR crew team).
We wouldn't be as concerned if the head of school didn't blow off our concerns as a general rule. Some of us, particularly those with hs students with ms sibs, are hoping that he leaves. He's much more interested in the ms than the hs, which has become a problem.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:From a practical perspective, how could a PTO/PTA operate if a public charter school franchise was hostile to the mere concept? Bribery of school officials to entice them to accept funds for pet parent projects and favored policies? BASIS parents don't have a history of rocking the boat to effect change. They can't risk alienating admins. They don't want to move from the District and tend to have no other viable public MS option. The ad hoc initiative to push to improve teachers pay was radical by BASIS standards.
You'd be surprised how schools come around when there's a lot of cash on the table.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:From a practical perspective, how could a PTO/PTA operate if a public charter school franchise was hostile to the mere concept? Bribery of school officials to entice them to accept funds for pet parent projects and favored policies? BASIS parents don't have a history of rocking the boat to effect change. They can't risk alienating admins. They don't want to move from the District and tend to have no other viable public MS option. The ad hoc initiative to push to improve teachers pay was radical by BASIS standards.
You'd be surprised how schools come around when there's a lot of cash on the table.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Caltech isn't more selective than HYP. They admit a little less than 4%; YHP, too. Caltech is impressive but admissions this year weren't overall. This year's class was no smaller than previous classes with multiple Ivy League admins. You know this, I do, other parents, too, admins know it. Yet there's forum for discussing the issues within the BASIS community, no analysis of what went wrong, at least none that parents are privy to, no plan of action to improve matters.
OK, YPSMBCP.
Harvard: 3.19%
Columbia: 3.73%
Caltech: 3.92%
Stanford: 3.95%
MIT: 3.96%
Princeton: 4.38%
Yale: 4.6%
Brown: 5.03%
Chicago: 5.4%
Penn: 5.87%
Anonymous wrote:From a practical perspective, how could a PTO/PTA operate if a public charter school franchise was hostile to the mere concept? Bribery of school officials to entice them to accept funds for pet parent projects and favored policies? BASIS parents don't have a history of rocking the boat to effect change. They can't risk alienating admins. They don't want to move from the District and tend to have no other viable public MS option. The ad hoc initiative to push to improve teachers pay was radical by BASIS standards.
Anonymous wrote:Caltech isn't more selective than HYP. They admit a little less than 4%; YHP, too. Caltech is impressive but admissions this year weren't overall. This year's class was no smaller than previous classes with multiple Ivy League admins. You know this, I do, other parents, too, admins know it. Yet there's forum for discussing the issues within the BASIS community, no analysis of what went wrong, at least none that parents are privy to, no plan of action to improve matters.
Anonymous wrote:Where are these BASIS haters? Every parent who's concerned that BASIS' approach to college admissions is losing its edge is a hater. Got it.
Anonymous wrote:Ivy League admissions aren't down, they're gone, at least for now.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Here's what I don't understand (as a 5th grade parent): why don't students just start a PTO? BASIS can't stop them from creating something like "friends of BASIS" and collecting money that could be given to the school with strings attached, and I would much rather donate to a PTO than to BASIS itself, because they piss me off on the regular.
Sorry "students" should be "parents" - why don't the parents just start the organization (not ask permission - just do it).
Serious question? You can't have served as a PTA official. PTAs or POs need to be incorporated as non-profits with school support to raise money legally. The BASIS franchise doesn't permit PTAs or POs. They permit "Booster Clubs" that raise money for the school and hand it off to admins. At BASIS DC, the funds are used to boost teachers' salaries.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Here's what I don't understand (as a 5th grade parent): why don't students just start a PTO? BASIS can't stop them from creating something like "friends of BASIS" and collecting money that could be given to the school with strings attached, and I would much rather donate to a PTO than to BASIS itself, because they piss me off on the regular.
Sorry "students" should be "parents" - why don't the parents just start the organization (not ask permission - just do it).
Anonymous wrote:Basis Crew and Fencing is top notch.