Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:For undergrad, students should pick the school that's more prestigious generally speaking. GT is ranked higher than Harvard for CompSci but would your DC really pick GT CS over Harvard CS if lucky enough to get in?! Exactly, same principle applies to Emory. Unless your instate Emory is the better choice as it's just the better school. If you want to pay 50k+ for a school ranked 40ish be my guest but many of us wouldn't.

What sort of idiocy is this.

Emory is not Harvard. Believe it or not, the drop off in prestige after the top 8 or so is massive.

GT CS meanwhile is prestigious.

No one said it was. But a top 20/25 is what it is. Emory's endowment is over 10 billion, GT not even 2. If Emory truly wants an full engineering program ( which they seem to be developing a partial one currently) they can do so. GT cannot afford a hospital. Also the outcomes for Emory CS is comparable to GT CS even though GTCS is ranked much higher.

No, a top 20/25 is nothing. There's no functional difference in prestige between a "top 20/25" and a top "40/45".

GT CS is top 10 in the country, and its engineering programs are regularly ranked in the top 3. Emory doesn't have an engineering program. Emory could spend their entire $10 billion endowment on engineering and still not be where GT is today.

Beginning to get UVA vibes from Gatech people.

Huh? The Emory boosters — who just had to try to derail a thread about GaT — are the ones radiating UVA vibes.

No they're radiating Emory booster vibes. Don't conflate the two.

I agree that the Emory booster(s) are more delusional than the UVA boosters, but they both have this weird compulsion to jump on any unrelated thread about another school in their state to insist that their school is better.

UVA and Emory are the best schools in their respective states. And GT students started it with Emory first, of you read the reddit post. Either way nothing said is a lie, what's delusional is thinking GT is prestigious in any way.

I'd argue GT is better than Emory in many areas and I wouldn't argue that UVA is the best in Virginia for everything a student might be looking for either.

That’s too bad for Virginia. UVA is so weak in STEM for a supposedly top 150 school.

+1

The VA area is government heavy. The skills needed are not really stem related. Regarding Emory and GT, yes GT is better for STEM but Emory is still the better more prestigious school. No one thinks VT is better than UVA even though VT is better for STEM. When Biden went to go visit Atlanta after the mass shooting he went to Emory to speak not GT. Says all that needs to be said really.

Newsflash. The T in STEM stands for Tech.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:For undergrad, students should pick the school that's more prestigious generally speaking. GT is ranked higher than Harvard for CompSci but would your DC really pick GT CS over Harvard CS if lucky enough to get in?! Exactly, same principle applies to Emory. Unless your instate Emory is the better choice as it's just the better school. If you want to pay 50k+ for a school ranked 40ish be my guest but many of us wouldn't.

What sort of idiocy is this.

Emory is not Harvard. Believe it or not, the drop off in prestige after the top 8 or so is massive.

GT CS meanwhile is prestigious.

No one said it was. But a top 20/25 is what it is. Emory's endowment is over 10 billion, GT not even 2. If Emory truly wants an full engineering program ( which they seem to be developing a partial one currently) they can do so. GT cannot afford a hospital. Also the outcomes for Emory CS is comparable to GT CS even though GTCS is ranked much higher.

No, a top 20/25 is nothing. There's no functional difference in prestige between a "top 20/25" and a top "40/45".

GT CS is top 10 in the country, and its engineering programs are regularly ranked in the top 3. Emory doesn't have an engineering program. Emory could spend their entire $10 billion endowment on engineering and still not be where GT is today.

Beginning to get UVA vibes from Gatech people.

Huh? The Emory boosters — who just had to try to derail a thread about GaT — are the ones radiating UVA vibes.

No they're radiating Emory booster vibes. Don't conflate the two.

I agree that the Emory booster(s) are more delusional than the UVA boosters, but they both have this weird compulsion to jump on any unrelated thread about another school in their state to insist that their school is better.

UVA and Emory are the best schools in their respective states. And GT students started it with Emory first, of you read the reddit post. Either way nothing said is a lie, what's delusional is thinking GT is prestigious in any way.

I'd argue GT is better than Emory in many areas and I wouldn't argue that UVA is the best in Virginia for everything a student might be looking for either.

That’s too bad for Virginia. UVA is so weak in STEM for a supposedly top 150 school.

+1

The VA area is government heavy. The skills needed are not really stem related. Regarding Emory and GT, yes GT is better for STEM but Emory is still the better more prestigious school. No one thinks VT is better than UVA even though VT is better for STEM. When Biden went to go visit Atlanta after the mass shooting he went to Emory to speak not GT. Says all that needs to be said really.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:For undergrad, students should pick the school that's more prestigious generally speaking. GT is ranked higher than Harvard for CompSci but would your DC really pick GT CS over Harvard CS if lucky enough to get in?! Exactly, same principle applies to Emory. Unless your instate Emory is the better choice as it's just the better school. If you want to pay 50k+ for a school ranked 40ish be my guest but many of us wouldn't.

What sort of idiocy is this.

Emory is not Harvard. Believe it or not, the drop off in prestige after the top 8 or so is massive.

GT CS meanwhile is prestigious.

No one said it was. But a top 20/25 is what it is. Emory's endowment is over 10 billion, GT not even 2. If Emory truly wants an full engineering program ( which they seem to be developing a partial one currently) they can do so. GT cannot afford a hospital. Also the outcomes for Emory CS is comparable to GT CS even though GTCS is ranked much higher.

No, a top 20/25 is nothing. There's no functional difference in prestige between a "top 20/25" and a top "40/45".

GT CS is top 10 in the country, and its engineering programs are regularly ranked in the top 3. Emory doesn't have an engineering program. Emory could spend their entire $10 billion endowment on engineering and still not be where GT is today.

Beginning to get UVA vibes from Gatech people.

Huh? The Emory boosters — who just had to try to derail a thread about GaT — are the ones radiating UVA vibes.

No they're radiating Emory booster vibes. Don't conflate the two.

I agree that the Emory booster(s) are more delusional than the UVA boosters, but they both have this weird compulsion to jump on any unrelated thread about another school in their state to insist that their school is better.

UVA and Emory are the best schools in their respective states. And GT students started it with Emory first, of you read the reddit post. Either way nothing said is a lie, what's delusional is thinking GT is prestigious in any way.

I'd argue GT is better than Emory in many areas and I wouldn't argue that UVA is the best in Virginia for everything a student might be looking for either.

That’s too bad for Virginia. UVA is so weak in STEM for a supposedly top 150 school.

+1

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:For undergrad, students should pick the school that's more prestigious generally speaking. GT is ranked higher than Harvard for CompSci but would your DC really pick GT CS over Harvard CS if lucky enough to get in?! Exactly, same principle applies to Emory. Unless your instate Emory is the better choice as it's just the better school. If you want to pay 50k+ for a school ranked 40ish be my guest but many of us wouldn't.

What sort of idiocy is this.

Emory is not Harvard. Believe it or not, the drop off in prestige after the top 8 or so is massive.

GT CS meanwhile is prestigious.

No one said it was. But a top 20/25 is what it is. Emory's endowment is over 10 billion, GT not even 2. If Emory truly wants an full engineering program ( which they seem to be developing a partial one currently) they can do so. GT cannot afford a hospital. Also the outcomes for Emory CS is comparable to GT CS even though GTCS is ranked much higher.

No, a top 20/25 is nothing. There's no functional difference in prestige between a "top 20/25" and a top "40/45".

GT CS is top 10 in the country, and its engineering programs are regularly ranked in the top 3. Emory doesn't have an engineering program. Emory could spend their entire $10 billion endowment on engineering and still not be where GT is today.

Beginning to get UVA vibes from Gatech people.

Huh? The Emory boosters — who just had to try to derail a thread about GaT — are the ones radiating UVA vibes.

No they're radiating Emory booster vibes. Don't conflate the two.

I agree that the Emory booster(s) are more delusional than the UVA boosters, but they both have this weird compulsion to jump on any unrelated thread about another school in their state to insist that their school is better.

UVA and Emory are the best schools in their respective states. And GT students started it with Emory first, of you read the reddit post. Either way nothing said is a lie, what's delusional is thinking GT is prestigious in any way.

I'd argue GT is better than Emory in many areas and I wouldn't argue that UVA is the best in Virginia for everything a student might be looking for either.

That’s too bad for Virginia. UVA is so weak in STEM for a supposedly top 50 school.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:For undergrad, students should pick the school that's more prestigious generally speaking. GT is ranked higher than Harvard for CompSci but would your DC really pick GT CS over Harvard CS if lucky enough to get in?! Exactly, same principle applies to Emory. Unless your instate Emory is the better choice as it's just the better school. If you want to pay 50k+ for a school ranked 40ish be my guest but many of us wouldn't.

What sort of idiocy is this.

Emory is not Harvard. Believe it or not, the drop off in prestige after the top 8 or so is massive.

GT CS meanwhile is prestigious.

No one said it was. But a top 20/25 is what it is. Emory's endowment is over 10 billion, GT not even 2. If Emory truly wants an full engineering program ( which they seem to be developing a partial one currently) they can do so. GT cannot afford a hospital. Also the outcomes for Emory CS is comparable to GT CS even though GTCS is ranked much higher.

No, a top 20/25 is nothing. There's no functional difference in prestige between a "top 20/25" and a top "40/45".

GT CS is top 10 in the country, and its engineering programs are regularly ranked in the top 3. Emory doesn't have an engineering program. Emory could spend their entire $10 billion endowment on engineering and still not be where GT is today.

Beginning to get UVA vibes from Gatech people.

Huh? The Emory boosters — who just had to try to derail a thread about GaT — are the ones radiating UVA vibes.

No they're radiating Emory booster vibes. Don't conflate the two.

I agree that the Emory booster(s) are more delusional than the UVA boosters, but they both have this weird compulsion to jump on any unrelated thread about another school in their state to insist that their school is better.

UVA and Emory are the best schools in their respective states. And GT students started it with Emory first, of you read the reddit post. Either way nothing said is a lie, what's delusional is thinking GT is prestigious in any way.

I'd argue GT is better than Emory in many areas and I wouldn't argue that UVA is the best in Virginia for everything a student might be looking for either.

That’s too bad for Virginia. UVA is so weak in STEM for a supposedly top 150 school.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:For undergrad, students should pick the school that's more prestigious generally speaking. GT is ranked higher than Harvard for CompSci but would your DC really pick GT CS over Harvard CS if lucky enough to get in?! Exactly, same principle applies to Emory. Unless your instate Emory is the better choice as it's just the better school. If you want to pay 50k+ for a school ranked 40ish be my guest but many of us wouldn't.

What sort of idiocy is this.

Emory is not Harvard. Believe it or not, the drop off in prestige after the top 8 or so is massive.

GT CS meanwhile is prestigious.

No one said it was. But a top 20/25 is what it is. Emory's endowment is over 10 billion, GT not even 2. If Emory truly wants an full engineering program ( which they seem to be developing a partial one currently) they can do so. GT cannot afford a hospital. Also the outcomes for Emory CS is comparable to GT CS even though GTCS is ranked much higher.

No, a top 20/25 is nothing. There's no functional difference in prestige between a "top 20/25" and a top "40/45".

GT CS is top 10 in the country, and its engineering programs are regularly ranked in the top 3. Emory doesn't have an engineering program. Emory could spend their entire $10 billion endowment on engineering and still not be where GT is today.

Beginning to get UVA vibes from Gatech people.

Huh? The Emory boosters — who just had to try to derail a thread about GaT — are the ones radiating UVA vibes.

No they're radiating Emory booster vibes. Don't conflate the two.

I agree that the Emory booster(s) are more delusional than the UVA boosters, but they both have this weird compulsion to jump on any unrelated thread about another school in their state to insist that their school is better.

UVA and Emory are the best schools in their respective states. And GT students started it with Emory first, of you read the reddit post. Either way nothing said is a lie, what's delusional is thinking GT is prestigious in any way.

GT is absolutely prestigious in tech fields. You are very ignorant for not knowing this. If you want to go into tech, you are definitely better off going there than to Emory - and getting into GT does not involve competing against people who don't want to do tech, as does getting into Emory.

GT might focus on tech but they do share majors like business and neuroscience etc.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:For undergrad, students should pick the school that's more prestigious generally speaking. GT is ranked higher than Harvard for CompSci but would your DC really pick GT CS over Harvard CS if lucky enough to get in?! Exactly, same principle applies to Emory. Unless your instate Emory is the better choice as it's just the better school. If you want to pay 50k+ for a school ranked 40ish be my guest but many of us wouldn't.

What sort of idiocy is this.

Emory is not Harvard. Believe it or not, the drop off in prestige after the top 8 or so is massive.

GT CS meanwhile is prestigious.

No one said it was. But a top 20/25 is what it is. Emory's endowment is over 10 billion, GT not even 2. If Emory truly wants an full engineering program ( which they seem to be developing a partial one currently) they can do so. GT cannot afford a hospital. Also the outcomes for Emory CS is comparable to GT CS even though GTCS is ranked much higher.

No, a top 20/25 is nothing. There's no functional difference in prestige between a "top 20/25" and a top "40/45".

GT CS is top 10 in the country, and its engineering programs are regularly ranked in the top 3. Emory doesn't have an engineering program. Emory could spend their entire $10 billion endowment on engineering and still not be where GT is today.

Beginning to get UVA vibes from Gatech people.

Huh? The Emory boosters — who just had to try to derail a thread about GaT — are the ones radiating UVA vibes.

No they're radiating Emory booster vibes. Don't conflate the two.

I agree that the Emory booster(s) are more delusional than the UVA boosters, but they both have this weird compulsion to jump on any unrelated thread about another school in their state to insist that their school is better.

UVA and Emory are the best schools in their respective states. And GT students started it with Emory first, of you read the reddit post. Either way nothing said is a lie, what's delusional is thinking GT is prestigious in any way.

I'd argue GT is better than Emory in many areas and I wouldn't argue that UVA is the best in Virginia for everything a student might be looking for either.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:For undergrad, students should pick the school that's more prestigious generally speaking. GT is ranked higher than Harvard for CompSci but would your DC really pick GT CS over Harvard CS if lucky enough to get in?! Exactly, same principle applies to Emory. Unless your instate Emory is the better choice as it's just the better school. If you want to pay 50k+ for a school ranked 40ish be my guest but many of us wouldn't.

What sort of idiocy is this.

Emory is not Harvard. Believe it or not, the drop off in prestige after the top 8 or so is massive.

GT CS meanwhile is prestigious.

No one said it was. But a top 20/25 is what it is. Emory's endowment is over 10 billion, GT not even 2. If Emory truly wants an full engineering program ( which they seem to be developing a partial one currently) they can do so. GT cannot afford a hospital. Also the outcomes for Emory CS is comparable to GT CS even though GTCS is ranked much higher.

No, a top 20/25 is nothing. There's no functional difference in prestige between a "top 20/25" and a top "40/45".

GT CS is top 10 in the country, and its engineering programs are regularly ranked in the top 3. Emory doesn't have an engineering program. Emory could spend their entire $10 billion endowment on engineering and still not be where GT is today.

Beginning to get UVA vibes from Gatech people.

Huh? The Emory boosters — who just had to try to derail a thread about GaT — are the ones radiating UVA vibes.

No they're radiating Emory booster vibes. Don't conflate the two.

I agree that the Emory booster(s) are more delusional than the UVA boosters, but they both have this weird compulsion to jump on any unrelated thread about another school in their state to insist that their school is better.

UVA and Emory are the best schools in their respective states. And GT students started it with Emory first, of you read the reddit post. Either way nothing said is a lie, what's delusional is thinking GT is prestigious in any way.

GT is absolutely prestigious in tech fields. You are very ignorant for not knowing this. If you want to go into tech, you are definitely better off going there than to Emory - and getting into GT does not involve competing against people who don't want to do tech, as does getting into Emory.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:For undergrad, students should pick the school that's more prestigious generally speaking. GT is ranked higher than Harvard for CompSci but would your DC really pick GT CS over Harvard CS if lucky enough to get in?! Exactly, same principle applies to Emory. Unless your instate Emory is the better choice as it's just the better school. If you want to pay 50k+ for a school ranked 40ish be my guest but many of us wouldn't.

What sort of idiocy is this.

Emory is not Harvard. Believe it or not, the drop off in prestige after the top 8 or so is massive.

GT CS meanwhile is prestigious.

No one said it was. But a top 20/25 is what it is. Emory's endowment is over 10 billion, GT not even 2. If Emory truly wants an full engineering program ( which they seem to be developing a partial one currently) they can do so. GT cannot afford a hospital. Also the outcomes for Emory CS is comparable to GT CS even though GTCS is ranked much higher.

No, a top 20/25 is nothing. There's no functional difference in prestige between a "top 20/25" and a top "40/45".

GT CS is top 10 in the country, and its engineering programs are regularly ranked in the top 3. Emory doesn't have an engineering program. Emory could spend their entire $10 billion endowment on engineering and still not be where GT is today.

Beginning to get UVA vibes from Gatech people.

Huh? The Emory boosters — who just had to try to derail a thread about GaT — are the ones radiating UVA vibes.

No they're radiating Emory booster vibes. Don't conflate the two.

I agree that the Emory booster(s) are more delusional than the UVA boosters, but they both have this weird compulsion to jump on any unrelated thread about another school in their state to insist that their school is better.

UVA and Emory are the best schools in their respective states. And GT students started it with Emory first, of you read the reddit post. Either way nothing said is a lie, what's delusional is thinking GT is prestigious in any way.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:For undergrad, students should pick the school that's more prestigious generally speaking. GT is ranked higher than Harvard for CompSci but would your DC really pick GT CS over Harvard CS if lucky enough to get in?! Exactly, same principle applies to Emory. Unless your instate Emory is the better choice as it's just the better school. If you want to pay 50k+ for a school ranked 40ish be my guest but many of us wouldn't.

What sort of idiocy is this.

Emory is not Harvard. Believe it or not, the drop off in prestige after the top 8 or so is massive.

GT CS meanwhile is prestigious.

No one said it was. But a top 20/25 is what it is. Emory's endowment is over 10 billion, GT not even 2. If Emory truly wants an full engineering program ( which they seem to be developing a partial one currently) they can do so. GT cannot afford a hospital. Also the outcomes for Emory CS is comparable to GT CS even though GTCS is ranked much higher.

No, a top 20/25 is nothing. There's no functional difference in prestige between a "top 20/25" and a top "40/45".

GT CS is top 10 in the country, and its engineering programs are regularly ranked in the top 3. Emory doesn't have an engineering program. Emory could spend their entire $10 billion endowment on engineering and still not be where GT is today.

Beginning to get UVA vibes from Gatech people.

Huh? The Emory boosters — who just had to try to derail a thread about GaT — are the ones radiating UVA vibes.

No they're radiating Emory booster vibes. Don't conflate the two.

I agree that the Emory booster(s) are more delusional than the UVA boosters, but they both have this weird compulsion to jump on any unrelated thread about another school in their state to insist that their school is better.

Actually it seems to be quite the opposite...there are numerous posts just on this thread randomly knocking UVA and anyone that responds, your post included. No dog in this fight so just my outside observation.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:For undergrad, students should pick the school that's more prestigious generally speaking. GT is ranked higher than Harvard for CompSci but would your DC really pick GT CS over Harvard CS if lucky enough to get in?! Exactly, same principle applies to Emory. Unless your instate Emory is the better choice as it's just the better school. If you want to pay 50k+ for a school ranked 40ish be my guest but many of us wouldn't.

What sort of idiocy is this.

Emory is not Harvard. Believe it or not, the drop off in prestige after the top 8 or so is massive.

GT CS meanwhile is prestigious.

No one said it was. But a top 20/25 is what it is. Emory's endowment is over 10 billion, GT not even 2. If Emory truly wants an full engineering program ( which they seem to be developing a partial one currently) they can do so. GT cannot afford a hospital. Also the outcomes for Emory CS is comparable to GT CS even though GTCS is ranked much higher.

No, a top 20/25 is nothing. There's no functional difference in prestige between a "top 20/25" and a top "40/45".

GT CS is top 10 in the country, and its engineering programs are regularly ranked in the top 3. Emory doesn't have an engineering program. Emory could spend their entire $10 billion endowment on engineering and still not be where GT is today.

Beginning to get UVA vibes from Gatech people.

Huh? The Emory boosters — who just had to try to derail a thread about GaT — are the ones radiating UVA vibes.

No they're radiating Emory booster vibes. Don't conflate the two.

I agree that the Emory booster(s) are more delusional than the UVA boosters, but they both have this weird compulsion to jump on any unrelated thread about another school in their state to insist that their school is better.

UVA and Emory are the best schools in their respective states. And GT students started it with Emory first, of you read the reddit post. Either way nothing said is a lie, what's delusional is thinking GT is prestigious in any way.

University of Kentucky is the best school in the entire state of Kentucky!.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:For undergrad, students should pick the school that's more prestigious generally speaking. GT is ranked higher than Harvard for CompSci but would your DC really pick GT CS over Harvard CS if lucky enough to get in?! Exactly, same principle applies to Emory. Unless your instate Emory is the better choice as it's just the better school. If you want to pay 50k+ for a school ranked 40ish be my guest but many of us wouldn't.

What sort of idiocy is this.

Emory is not Harvard. Believe it or not, the drop off in prestige after the top 8 or so is massive.

GT CS meanwhile is prestigious.

No one said it was. But a top 20/25 is what it is. Emory's endowment is over 10 billion, GT not even 2. If Emory truly wants an full engineering program ( which they seem to be developing a partial one currently) they can do so. GT cannot afford a hospital. Also the outcomes for Emory CS is comparable to GT CS even though GTCS is ranked much higher.

No, a top 20/25 is nothing. There's no functional difference in prestige between a "top 20/25" and a top "40/45".

GT CS is top 10 in the country, and its engineering programs are regularly ranked in the top 3. Emory doesn't have an engineering program. Emory could spend their entire $10 billion endowment on engineering and still not be where GT is today.

Beginning to get UVA vibes from Gatech people.

Huh? The Emory boosters — who just had to try to derail a thread about GaT — are the ones radiating UVA vibes.

No they're radiating Emory booster vibes. Don't conflate the two.

I agree that the Emory booster(s) are more delusional than the UVA boosters, but they both have this weird compulsion to jump on any unrelated thread about another school in their state to insist that their school is better.

UVA and Emory are the best schools in their respective states. And GT students started it with Emory first, of you read the reddit post. Either way nothing said is a lie, what's delusional is thinking GT is prestigious in any way.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:For undergrad, students should pick the school that's more prestigious generally speaking. GT is ranked higher than Harvard for CompSci but would your DC really pick GT CS over Harvard CS if lucky enough to get in?! Exactly, same principle applies to Emory. Unless your instate Emory is the better choice as it's just the better school. If you want to pay 50k+ for a school ranked 40ish be my guest but many of us wouldn't.

What sort of idiocy is this.

Emory is not Harvard. Believe it or not, the drop off in prestige after the top 8 or so is massive.

GT CS meanwhile is prestigious.

No one said it was. But a top 20/25 is what it is. Emory's endowment is over 10 billion, GT not even 2. If Emory truly wants an full engineering program ( which they seem to be developing a partial one currently) they can do so. GT cannot afford a hospital. Also the outcomes for Emory CS is comparable to GT CS even though GTCS is ranked much higher.

No, a top 20/25 is nothing. There's no functional difference in prestige between a "top 20/25" and a top "40/45".

GT CS is top 10 in the country, and its engineering programs are regularly ranked in the top 3. Emory doesn't have an engineering program. Emory could spend their entire $10 billion endowment on engineering and still not be where GT is today.

Beginning to get UVA vibes from Gatech people.

Huh? The Emory boosters — who just had to try to derail a thread about GaT — are the ones radiating UVA vibes.

No they're radiating Emory booster vibes. Don't conflate the two.

I agree that the Emory booster(s) are more delusional than the UVA boosters, but they both have this weird compulsion to jump on any unrelated thread about another school in their state to insist that their school is better.