Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:UVA
Hands down - UVA - the Harvard of the South
The Harvard of the South would be Duke
UVA is the Tufts of the South
UVA is much better than Tufts at its best.
No. UVA is relentlessly oversold.
It might be but it's still much better than Tufts.
Tufts ROI is $1.54M vs. $1.29M for UVA. Tufts value add over expected earnings is +$5,700 per year. UVA's is -$2,400 per year.
https://cew.georgetown.edu/cew-reports/college-rankings/#interactivehttps://cew.georgetown.edu/cew-reports/collegeroi/
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:UVA
Hands down - UVA - the Harvard of the South
The Harvard of the South would be Duke
UVA is the Tufts of the South
UVA is much better than Tufts at its best.
No. UVA is relentlessly oversold.
It might be but it's still much better than Tufts.
Anonymous wrote:I feel like there's at least one person obsessed with trashing Emory and Chicago
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Schools that feel “strivery” are annoying. Doesn’t mean the education isn’t just fine but not what they comport themselves to be. o
Examples: U chicago (while a good school for sure, the kids and school feel like they are trying too too hard) , Tulane, Wash U, NYU.
Says the state school grad. It’s better to strive than to be out of the game altogether.
Paying more for a private school does not make you more elite, haha. Would take Berkeley “state school” non-striver over a gross Uchicago “wanna-be Ivy” any day.
Non-strivers don't get into Berkeley. Berkeley is entirely full of strivers - as are most top public universities - and that is not a bad thing in any way.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Schools that feel “strivery” are annoying. Doesn’t mean the education isn’t just fine but not what they comport themselves to be. o
Examples: U chicago (while a good school for sure, the kids and school feel like they are trying too too hard) , Tulane, Wash U, NYU.
Says the state school grad. It’s better to strive than to be out of the game altogether.
Paying more for a private school does not make you more elite, haha. Would take Berkeley “state school” non-striver over a gross Uchicago “wanna-be Ivy” any day.
Non-strivers don't get into Berkeley. Berkeley is entirely full of strivers - as are most top universities - and that is not a bad thing in any way.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:duke
Duke envy! Honest persons admit Duke is an elite institution with a consistently great basketball team.
Much UVA hate which seems in response to UVA boosters trying to elevate the brand higher than reality.
No, it's actually the reverse. Usually, on this board someone makes the stupid "UVA is overrated" comment, thinking they are being clever, when we all know they are a student from a rival school like VTech or UMD pr a parent or student who is bitter because they didn't get in or, as in the case of my DC, didn't even have the stats to apply. Then someone who actually knows something about UVA posts the stats required to attend or something positive with a link. I rarely see a booster here go first, like the funny "Roll Tide" booster. It's pure envy and sadly because this is anonymous, the bitter people post first. For example, just a few posts above someone said out of the blue "UVA because NOVA parents are so obnoxious" which is fallacious for a number of reasons not even worth addressing but supports my point that the bitter posters go first.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Schools that feel “strivery” are annoying. Doesn’t mean the education isn’t just fine but not what they comport themselves to be. o
Examples: U chicago (while a good school for sure, the kids and school feel like they are trying too too hard) , Tulane, Wash U, NYU.
Says the state school grad. It’s better to strive than to be out of the game altogether.
Paying more for a private school does not make you more elite, haha. Would take Berkeley “state school” non-striver over a gross Uchicago “wanna-be Ivy” any day.
Anonymous wrote:Schools that feel “strivery” are annoying. Doesn’t mean the education isn’t just fine but not what they comport themselves to be.
Examples: U chicago (while a good school for sure, the kids and school feel like they are trying too too hard) , Tulane, Wash U, NYU.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:duke
Duke envy! Honest persons admit Duke is an elite institution with a consistently great basketball team.
Much UVA hate which seems in response to UVA boosters trying to elevate the brand higher than reality.
Anonymous wrote:duke
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:UVA
Hands down - UVA - the Harvard of the South
The Harvard of the South would be Duke
UVA is the Tufts of the South
UVA is much better than Tufts at its best.
No. UVA is relentlessly oversold.