Anonymous wrote:You can get it optioned with body-colored fenders and body-colored top so it all matches. It does not have to have the cheap plastic fenders. Historically the Wranglers with all of the plastic are the cheapest trims, hence it looks "cheap". If some mid-life crisis guy is going to spend 50 grand on a Rubicon trim, you might as well click two more boxes for body-colored fenders and top, so it doesn't look like a cheap 25 grand model.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The black plastic fenders make them look cheap.
They’re plastic for a few reasons:
1) they offer a degree of “forgiveness” when you get up against a tree or a rock on a tight trail. A metal fender flare would be bent and scraped at the slightest rub, but the plastic ones are designed to flex somewhat and not suffer extensive damage
2) they’re designed to be easily replaced in the event of trail damage.
3) they’re often swapped-out for other types of aftermarket fenders, so putting a lot of detail finish into them is often wasted money.
It’s a Jeep. You have to understand what it’s designed for to understand why it’s designed that way. Otherwise it’s akin to complaining that race cars don’t have air conditioning or interiors.
Anonymous wrote:The black plastic fenders make them look cheap.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:As in, is this a mid-life crisis thing? We're in our mid 40s, our youngest will be going to college next fall, so we don't really need two SUVs anymore. However, isn't this a bit odd for a 40-something white collar dad? To me, it looks like something a college boy would drive.
![]()
If you asked me to guess what this cost I would assume $15,000 and that it was 5 or 10 years old. I can't believe these are $50,000 to $55,000. Not to mention even brand new they look basically identical to a 10 year old one.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:As in, is this a mid-life crisis thing? We're in our mid 40s, our youngest will be going to college next fall, so we don't really need two SUVs anymore. However, isn't this a bit odd for a 40-something white collar dad? To me, it looks like something a college boy would drive.
![]()
If you asked me to guess what this cost I would assume $15,000 and that it was 5 or 10 years old. I can't believe these are $50,000 to $55,000. Not to mention even brand new they look basically identical to a 10 year old one.
Anonymous wrote:As in, is this a mid-life crisis thing? We're in our mid 40s, our youngest will be going to college next fall, so we don't really need two SUVs anymore. However, isn't this a bit odd for a 40-something white collar dad? To me, it looks like something a college boy would drive.
![]()
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I don't think the nice ones can be hosed down. The one we test drove had a large navigation screen and leather seats and cost over $50,000. It looked okay but once you sat in it and drove it, it felt a bit cheap. I didn't expect it to feel like an S Class Mercedes, of course, but I did expect it to at least feel more solid than it did.
I’m guessing at that price point you were test driving a Rubicon?
You’re not paying the extra premium for the interior. You’re paying for off-road technology. Electronic differential locks, sway bar disconnects, trail cameras, larger tires, suspension upgrades, winch bumpers, underbody armor, rocker panel armor. Plus an interior where everything is designed to be water resistant.
The fact that you don’t understand all that stuff sort of indicates that Jeeps aren’t suited for you.
Buy a Honda CR-V and stay in your lane.
You can say the same about a sports car, but an AMG still feels quality inside.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I don't think the nice ones can be hosed down. The one we test drove had a large navigation screen and leather seats and cost over $50,000. It looked okay but once you sat in it and drove it, it felt a bit cheap. I didn't expect it to feel like an S Class Mercedes, of course, but I did expect it to at least feel more solid than it did.
I’m guessing at that price point you were test driving a Rubicon?
You’re not paying the extra premium for the interior. You’re paying for off-road technology. Electronic differential locks, sway bar disconnects, trail cameras, larger tires, suspension upgrades, winch bumpers, underbody armor, rocker panel armor. Plus an interior where everything is designed to be water resistant.
The fact that you don’t understand all that stuff sort of indicates that Jeeps aren’t suited for you.
Buy a Honda CR-V and stay in your lane.
Yes we test drove a Rubicon. You're wrong about interior not being upgrades or the only upgrades being utility in nature. Leather seats, large navigation screen, better audio system, power seats, body-matched hard roof and fenders, etc. are standard and/or only offered on an expensive Rubicon spec.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I don't think the nice ones can be hosed down. The one we test drove had a large navigation screen and leather seats and cost over $50,000. It looked okay but once you sat in it and drove it, it felt a bit cheap. I didn't expect it to feel like an S Class Mercedes, of course, but I did expect it to at least feel more solid than it did.
I’m guessing at that price point you were test driving a Rubicon?
You’re not paying the extra premium for the interior. You’re paying for off-road technology. Electronic differential locks, sway bar disconnects, trail cameras, larger tires, suspension upgrades, winch bumpers, underbody armor, rocker panel armor. Plus an interior where everything is designed to be water resistant.
The fact that you don’t understand all that stuff sort of indicates that Jeeps aren’t suited for you.
Buy a Honda CR-V and stay in your lane.
You can say the same about a sports car, but an AMG still feels quality inside.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I don't think the nice ones can be hosed down. The one we test drove had a large navigation screen and leather seats and cost over $50,000. It looked okay but once you sat in it and drove it, it felt a bit cheap. I didn't expect it to feel like an S Class Mercedes, of course, but I did expect it to at least feel more solid than it did.
I’m guessing at that price point you were test driving a Rubicon?
You’re not paying the extra premium for the interior. You’re paying for off-road technology. Electronic differential locks, sway bar disconnects, trail cameras, larger tires, suspension upgrades, winch bumpers, underbody armor, rocker panel armor. Plus an interior where everything is designed to be water resistant.
The fact that you don’t understand all that stuff sort of indicates that Jeeps aren’t suited for you.
Buy a Honda CR-V and stay in your lane.
You can say the same about a sports car, but an AMG still feels quality inside.
Horrible analogy. A Jeep is more like a ATV’s interior. Spartan and cheap. It’s made to get wet and dirty and get cleaned off with a rag and a hose. It’s not a luxury vehicle - it’s an off-road vehicle.
Do you often compare apples and oranges in other aspects of life?
Range rovers and land cruisers manage to be capable off road and luxurious inside.
A Land Cruiser or Range Rover couldn’t even make it up the entrance road to the start of a typical Jeep trail.
You really have no clue what you’re talking about.
99% of rubicons will never get near a trail head. Meanwhile land rovers and land cruisers have no problem actually being used off road throughout the world
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I don't think the nice ones can be hosed down. The one we test drove had a large navigation screen and leather seats and cost over $50,000. It looked okay but once you sat in it and drove it, it felt a bit cheap. I didn't expect it to feel like an S Class Mercedes, of course, but I did expect it to at least feel more solid than it did.
I’m guessing at that price point you were test driving a Rubicon?
You’re not paying the extra premium for the interior. You’re paying for off-road technology. Electronic differential locks, sway bar disconnects, trail cameras, larger tires, suspension upgrades, winch bumpers, underbody armor, rocker panel armor. Plus an interior where everything is designed to be water resistant.
The fact that you don’t understand all that stuff sort of indicates that Jeeps aren’t suited for you.
Buy a Honda CR-V and stay in your lane.
You can say the same about a sports car, but an AMG still feels quality inside.
Horrible analogy. A Jeep is more like a ATV’s interior. Spartan and cheap. It’s made to get wet and dirty and get cleaned off with a rag and a hose. It’s not a luxury vehicle - it’s an off-road vehicle.
Do you often compare apples and oranges in other aspects of life?
Range rovers and land cruisers manage to be capable off road and luxurious inside.
A Land Cruiser or Range Rover couldn’t even make it up the entrance road to the start of a typical Jeep trail.
You really have no clue what you’re talking about.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I don't think the nice ones can be hosed down. The one we test drove had a large navigation screen and leather seats and cost over $50,000. It looked okay but once you sat in it and drove it, it felt a bit cheap. I didn't expect it to feel like an S Class Mercedes, of course, but I did expect it to at least feel more solid than it did.
I’m guessing at that price point you were test driving a Rubicon?
You’re not paying the extra premium for the interior. You’re paying for off-road technology. Electronic differential locks, sway bar disconnects, trail cameras, larger tires, suspension upgrades, winch bumpers, underbody armor, rocker panel armor. Plus an interior where everything is designed to be water resistant.
The fact that you don’t understand all that stuff sort of indicates that Jeeps aren’t suited for you.
Buy a Honda CR-V and stay in your lane.
You can say the same about a sports car, but an AMG still feels quality inside.
Horrible analogy. A Jeep is more like a ATV’s interior. Spartan and cheap. It’s made to get wet and dirty and get cleaned off with a rag and a hose. It’s not a luxury vehicle - it’s an off-road vehicle.
Do you often compare apples and oranges in other aspects of life?
Range rovers and land cruisers manage to be capable off road and luxurious inside.