Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:You get in by having a very high LSAT and GPA. They are numbers driven. The "feeder" schools are largely the schools that have a higher percentage of students that will get high LSAT scores and GPAs. The school isn't producing them as much as they are enrolling them.
If you look at the average LSAT and GPAs from ABA: https://www.americanbar.org/content/dam/aba/administrative/legal_education_and_admissions_to_the_bar/council_reports_and_resolutions/May2018CouncilOpenSession/18_may_2015_2017_top_240_feeder_schools_for_aba_applicants.authcheckdam.pdf
A lot of schools have very similar average LSAT and GPAs but some schools like the ivies feed more into the top-tier law schools than other institutions. For top-tier law schools, having a high LSAT and GPA is just a prerequisite and other factors are taken into consideration during the admissions process.
For example, the undergraduate schools ranked by average LSAT scores in 2017 are:
Yale - 167.5
Harvard - 167.4
Princeton - 166.10
UChicago - 165.98
Stanford - 165.72
Dartmouth - 165.67
Columbia - 165
Duke - 164.97
Penn - 164.58
Tufts - 164.48
Brown - 164.31
Northwestern - 164.30
WUSTL - 164.05
Georgetown - 163.48
Vanderbilt - 163.45
Rice - 163.44
Amherst - 162.79
Notre Dame - 162.75
Cornell - 162.65
McGill - 162.64
Wesleyan - 162.61
JHU - 161.82
NYU - 161.75
W&M - 161.18
UVA - 160.84
UBC (Canada) - 160.76
BC - 160.70
Emory - 160.64
Michigan - 160.48
Brandeis - 160.30
Colgate - 160.23
Berkeley - 159.44
The clear overperformers (for YLS and SLS) are schools like Columbia, Cornell, Brown, Georgetown, Berkeley, while Duke, Tufts, Northwestern, WUSTL, UChicago, Vanderbilt underperform relative to their peer institutions.
Feeders are not a thing no matter how many times these lists are repeated. The applicant's test score is what matters, not the average for the undergrad. A particular applicant's undergrad does not affect their LSAT score.
It does unfortunately. Otherwise UChicago or Stanford would be sending droves of kids into YLS, but unfortunately they don't. YLS has a very clear East Coast bias.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:You get in by having a very high LSAT and GPA. They are numbers driven. The "feeder" schools are largely the schools that have a higher percentage of students that will get high LSAT scores and GPAs. The school isn't producing them as much as they are enrolling them.
If you look at the average LSAT and GPAs from ABA: https://www.americanbar.org/content/dam/aba/administrative/legal_education_and_admissions_to_the_bar/council_reports_and_resolutions/May2018CouncilOpenSession/18_may_2015_2017_top_240_feeder_schools_for_aba_applicants.authcheckdam.pdf
A lot of schools have very similar average LSAT and GPAs but some schools like the ivies feed more into the top-tier law schools than other institutions. For top-tier law schools, having a high LSAT and GPA is just a prerequisite and other factors are taken into consideration during the admissions process.
For example, the undergraduate schools ranked by average LSAT scores in 2017 are:
Yale - 167.5
Harvard - 167.4
Princeton - 166.10
UChicago - 165.98
Stanford - 165.72
Dartmouth - 165.67
Columbia - 165
Duke - 164.97
Penn - 164.58
Tufts - 164.48
Brown - 164.31
Northwestern - 164.30
WUSTL - 164.05
Georgetown - 163.48
Vanderbilt - 163.45
Rice - 163.44
Amherst - 162.79
Notre Dame - 162.75
Cornell - 162.65
McGill - 162.64
Wesleyan - 162.61
JHU - 161.82
NYU - 161.75
W&M - 161.18
UVA - 160.84
UBC (Canada) - 160.76
BC - 160.70
Emory - 160.64
Michigan - 160.48
Brandeis - 160.30
Colgate - 160.23
Berkeley - 159.44
The clear overperformers (for YLS and SLS) are schools like Columbia, Cornell, Brown, Georgetown, Berkeley, while Duke, Tufts, Northwestern, WUSTL, UChicago, Vanderbilt underperform relative to their peer institutions.
Anonymous wrote:I read a study that elite grad programs really prefer to accept elite school grads. In fact more than 70% of elite post grad programs followed this rule. In addition there was a step down not a step up pattern in accepted students. For example an Ivy grad might go to an elite state school, not the other way around.
Sorry I can’t find the article but probably NYT or WPOST. Something to think about when applying. Better have a safety or two. Also for current applicants the required P/F for Covid isn’t helping too students.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:You get in by having a very high LSAT and GPA. They are numbers driven. The "feeder" schools are largely the schools that have a higher percentage of students that will get high LSAT scores and GPAs. The school isn't producing them as much as they are enrolling them.
If you look at the average LSAT and GPAs from ABA: https://www.americanbar.org/content/dam/aba/administrative/legal_education_and_admissions_to_the_bar/council_reports_and_resolutions/May2018CouncilOpenSession/18_may_2015_2017_top_240_feeder_schools_for_aba_applicants.authcheckdam.pdf
A lot of schools have very similar average LSAT and GPAs but some schools like the ivies feed more into the top-tier law schools than other institutions. For top-tier law schools, having a high LSAT and GPA is just a prerequisite and other factors are taken into consideration during the admissions process.
For example, the undergraduate schools ranked by average LSAT scores in 2017 are:
Yale - 167.5
Harvard - 167.4
Princeton - 166.10
UChicago - 165.98
Stanford - 165.72
Dartmouth - 165.67
Columbia - 165
Duke - 164.97
Penn - 164.58
Tufts - 164.48
Brown - 164.31
Northwestern - 164.30
WUSTL - 164.05
Georgetown - 163.48
Vanderbilt - 163.45
Rice - 163.44
Amherst - 162.79
Notre Dame - 162.75
Cornell - 162.65
McGill - 162.64
Wesleyan - 162.61
JHU - 161.82
NYU - 161.75
W&M - 161.18
UVA - 160.84
UBC (Canada) - 160.76
BC - 160.70
Emory - 160.64
Michigan - 160.48
Brandeis - 160.30
Colgate - 160.23
Berkeley - 159.44
The clear overperformers (for YLS and SLS) are schools like Columbia, Cornell, Brown, Georgetown, Berkeley, while Duke, Tufts, Northwestern, WUSTL, UChicago, Vanderbilt underperform relative to their peer institutions.
Feeders are not a thing no matter how many times these lists are repeated. The applicant's test score is what matters, not the average for the undergrad. A particular applicant's undergrad does not affect their LSAT score.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:You get in by having a very high LSAT and GPA. They are numbers driven. The "feeder" schools are largely the schools that have a higher percentage of students that will get high LSAT scores and GPAs. The school isn't producing them as much as they are enrolling them.
If you look at the average LSAT and GPAs from ABA: https://www.americanbar.org/content/dam/aba/administrative/legal_education_and_admissions_to_the_bar/council_reports_and_resolutions/May2018CouncilOpenSession/18_may_2015_2017_top_240_feeder_schools_for_aba_applicants.authcheckdam.pdf
A lot of schools have very similar average LSAT and GPAs but some schools like the ivies feed more into the top-tier law schools than other institutions. For top-tier law schools, having a high LSAT and GPA is just a prerequisite and other factors are taken into consideration during the admissions process.
For example, the undergraduate schools ranked by average LSAT scores in 2017 are:
Yale - 167.5
Harvard - 167.4
Princeton - 166.10
UChicago - 165.98
Stanford - 165.72
Dartmouth - 165.67
Columbia - 165
Duke - 164.97
Penn - 164.58
Tufts - 164.48
Brown - 164.31
Northwestern - 164.30
WUSTL - 164.05
Georgetown - 163.48
Vanderbilt - 163.45
Rice - 163.44
Amherst - 162.79
Notre Dame - 162.75
Cornell - 162.65
McGill - 162.64
Wesleyan - 162.61
JHU - 161.82
NYU - 161.75
W&M - 161.18
UVA - 160.84
UBC (Canada) - 160.76
BC - 160.70
Emory - 160.64
Michigan - 160.48
Brandeis - 160.30
Colgate - 160.23
Berkeley - 159.44
The clear overperformers (for YLS and SLS) are schools like Columbia, Cornell, Brown, Georgetown, Berkeley, while Duke, Tufts, Northwestern, WUSTL, UChicago, Vanderbilt underperform relative to their peer institutions.
Anonymous wrote:You get in by having a very high LSAT and GPA. They are numbers driven. The "feeder" schools are largely the schools that have a higher percentage of students that will get high LSAT scores and GPAs. The school isn't producing them as much as they are enrolling them.
Anonymous wrote:To everyone saying LSAT > GPA >":
If your undergraduate GPA is rubbish, is there some scheme to go to do a one year graduate program? I know a handful of people who've picked up a seemingly random master's degree, then went to top 14 law schools. Is the undergraduate GPA not used if you have a master's? As in, you only use the most recent degree's GPA, i.e. master's program?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:We are back to the tired "feeder" argument, I see. Dear teenagers, please understand that T14 law school admission is a numbers game, college GPA and LSAT. "Feeders" are not a thing, no matter how much you would like to believe that.
What percentage of the T14 admits have hooks of some kind? You often read in the press anecdotes about prominent so-and-so's child who is enrolled at one of these schools. What are the chances for the kid of a nobody like me, all other things being equal?