Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Here are the 2021 admissions from a Big3 (does not included multiple admits at many of the schools). Is there one college on this list that you wouldn't be happy that your kid is attending?
Personally I think it's awesome and guarantee that my kid will attend a decent college---never mind that they are also learning to to write well and think critically.
Boston College
Boston University
Brown
Bucknell
Colby
Colgate
William and Mary
Columbia
Cornell
Dartmouth
Davidson
Duke
Emory
Georgetown
Georgia Tech
Harvard
Johns Hopkins
NYU
Northwestern
Oberlin
Princeton
SMU
Stanford
Syracuse
Tufts
Tulane
UCLA
Chicago
Michigan
Penn
Richmond
Sewanee
USC
St. Andrews
UVA
Wisconsin
Vanderbilt
Wake Forest
Washington and Lee
Wash U
Yale
Is this the complete list?
Yes, complete list from alumni magazine this month
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I assume if anything, private school will hurt my kids’ chances in college admissions because they will have a lower class ranking. The flip side is they’ll end up better educated and more well-rounded than they would have had they gone to public school, so we’ll take the trade-off.
+1000
They'll also have a much better 13 years of school before going to college. Why people don't understand that that outweighs four years in college I don't know.
I came on to say just this. Come on. Everyone here went to college. It’s not irrelevant to various things, including grad school prospects, and it tends to be fun and somewhat formative. That second point is true wherever a kid goes, so long as it isn’t their parents’ basement. But did anyone here really think the prestige of their college was the make or break for work ethic? Love of learning? Learning to work as a team? Forming your basic values? Those mostly happen before college. Even if some things change in college—political views, etc—they’re changing from a baseline that was already formed. K-12 forms you—far more than college. K-12 is not a mindless path to college.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I assume if anything, private school will hurt my kids’ chances in college admissions because they will have a lower class ranking. The flip side is they’ll end up better educated and more well-rounded than they would have had they gone to public school, so we’ll take the trade-off.
+1000
They'll also have a much better 13 years of school before going to college. Why people don't understand that that outweighs four years in college I don't know.
Anonymous wrote:This thread is an interesting contrast to of all the threads bemoaning the poor admissions from the top publics in the area (Wilson, BCC, Whitman, etc) and the constant drumbeat on the public school threads that the only way to get your kid into a top college is to go private.
Looks like there are no easy answers! No one is happy with their kids' schools right now
Anonymous wrote:The early admissions decisions coming out of NCS and STA right now are very impressive so I am not sure that things have changed that much.
Anonymous wrote:A lot of absolute nonsense flying around in this thread.
Because schools publish admissions, and at least my school shares in one way or another specific students with specific colleges so you can tell who was URM/athlete/legacy/etc, I am really confused that people think it's possible that parents don't understand the lay of the land by the time their kids get to junior year. In many cases, these kids have been in the same school since pre-Kindergarten!
Parents know. It's not a last minute surprise that the majority of the class isn't going to an Ivy.
Anonymous wrote:What’s killing private schools is the tuition. It’s creating a barbell effect where only extremely wealthy families and those on financial aid can attend. Kids of journalists, government workers, and not-for-profits, not so much, and that makes for a less appealing school environment.
The college admissions bump comes from being able to apply ED because you were full pay at your private and will be full pay at the university.
Anonymous wrote:I think Privates work better with athletes since colleges can see that the athlete can handle more rigorous course work, but for everyone else private schools don’t give much of an advantage with admissions.
Anonymous wrote:Oh welcome back! It’s the lying troll who has _several_ kids at multiple different big 3 school. Is that, like, six kids? Seven?
Anonymous wrote:Im sounding the alarm. The end is near.
For any one of you paying full tuition at a Private School for college admissions purposes (hoping you'll get into a better college), you are 100% wasting your money. I have several children in Big 3's and unless you are URM, QuestBridge, Athlete or Legacy - you are completely wasting your money. No one cares that your school is tough. That a 3.7 is really great. No one cares about ACT/SATs anymore.
You are wasting your money. 100%
The college admissions process is now washed of achievement. And there is backlash against wealth and privilege.
Dont do it. Dont waste your time. And your money. And stop perpetuating the dummying down of our system.
I wish someone would have told me 3 years ago before I enrolled my kids. Total waste of money.