Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I'm not clear on what we're supposed to be outraged about. MCPS is spending too much money on this? MCPS isn't spending enough money on this?
+1 I'm actually someone who cares a great deal about good governance, transparency, and ethics, but I'm perplexed about why I'm supposed to be mad here. It appears that MCPS extended an existing partnership with a vendor, before this guy was selected. Graft works the other way around - he gets on the board and then directs funding to a contact. There's no opportunity for impropriety here, because the relationship with the vendor pre-existed the position.
Did he, his wife, or KID museum donate to any of the current BOE board members during the election?
Yes
Lets start to draw lines to connect the dots.
Kid museum or Joftus family donated to BOE Candidates who are sitting in the board room now,
Kid museum wants money from MCPS, and MCPS gave them $1.4M (I don't know if it needs board approval or not, or did any board member lobby for them to receive the grant or whatever you call it.).
A vacancy needs to be filled on the board. Suddenly
A few weeks later, a person, who has deep connection with both BOE and MCPS and who also received a lots of MONEY from MCPS, won the seat.
Please tell me you cannot smell anything fishy.
I am sure Mr. Joftus is a nice person, an ethical person, a person with a lots of knowledge and idea on educatio, as some posts said.
bUT,
If an applicant who is better qualified for the superintendent position shows up in the next few weeks, will Mr. Joftus vote for a better candidate or the one who gave his family business 1.4M?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:He did seem like a sensible choice. Janis needs to stand down.
Yes, if she targets Scott Joftus of all people, it's going to backfire on her. He's got tons of support in the community because of his character. So many people have either worked with him or known him from the neighborhood or school community and will attest that he's an ethical, smart and all around really good guy. I'm so sure of that that I think this one woman Janis must be responsible for all of the negative posts in this thread trying to create drama or some kind of suspicion about his intentions. People are going to have his back. And I say this as someone who is no fan of what's happening these days in MCPS and who hopes we get new leadership for the school system. I trust Scott to help steer us back in the right direction, whatever that requires.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I'm not clear on what we're supposed to be outraged about. MCPS is spending too much money on this? MCPS isn't spending enough money on this?
+1 I'm actually someone who cares a great deal about good governance, transparency, and ethics, but I'm perplexed about why I'm supposed to be mad here. It appears that MCPS extended an existing partnership with a vendor, before this guy was selected. Graft works the other way around - he gets on the board and then directs funding to a contact. There's no opportunity for impropriety here, because the relationship with the vendor pre-existed the position.
Did he, his wife, or KID museum donate to any of the current BOE board members during the election?
Yes
Anonymous wrote:He did seem like a sensible choice. Janis needs to stand down.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I'm not clear on what we're supposed to be outraged about. MCPS is spending too much money on this? MCPS isn't spending enough money on this?
+1 I'm actually someone who cares a great deal about good governance, transparency, and ethics, but I'm perplexed about why I'm supposed to be mad here. It appears that MCPS extended an existing partnership with a vendor, before this guy was selected. Graft works the other way around - he gets on the board and then directs funding to a contact. There's no opportunity for impropriety here, because the relationship with the vendor pre-existed the position.
Did he, his wife, or KID museum donate to any of the current BOE board members during the election?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I'm not clear on what we're supposed to be outraged about. MCPS is spending too much money on this? MCPS isn't spending enough money on this?
+1 I'm actually someone who cares a great deal about good governance, transparency, and ethics, but I'm perplexed about why I'm supposed to be mad here. It appears that MCPS extended an existing partnership with a vendor, before this guy was selected. Graft works the other way around - he gets on the board and then directs funding to a contact. There's no opportunity for impropriety here, because the relationship with the vendor pre-existed the position.
Did he, his wife, or KID museum donate to any of the current BOE board members during the election?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I'm not clear on what we're supposed to be outraged about. MCPS is spending too much money on this? MCPS isn't spending enough money on this?
+1 I'm actually someone who cares a great deal about good governance, transparency, and ethics, but I'm perplexed about why I'm supposed to be mad here. It appears that MCPS extended an existing partnership with a vendor, before this guy was selected. Graft works the other way around - he gets on the board and then directs funding to a contact. There's no opportunity for impropriety here, because the relationship with the vendor pre-existed the position.
Anonymous wrote:Hi all: This is Scott Joftus. Interesting discussion. I’m happy to discuss any issue with you. Feel free to give me a call: 301-524-2603 any time before 10 pm.
Why can’t all students have Science classes in their own school? Why can’t MCPS provide all students with science curriculum? How come only a few dozen students get bused to Bethesda for science from Joftus’ wife?
The number of MCPS students in poverty is high. They aren’t all being bused to Bethesda. Very few go.
Students from Ckarksburg? Do they ever get this Bethesda science from Joftus’ wife?