Anonymous wrote:His father bought him his own personal gun. For what POSSIBLE reason would you have to buy a 15-year-old a weapon like this? You don't even use it for hunting. Degenerate values.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Serious question - if dad purchased this gun legally, what type of “gun control” are people looking for that would have prevented this?
Extend the felony murder law to include weapons in a shared household.
If a person under your guardianship and residing in your household kills another person in a public building or grounds (hospital, school, post office, airport, military facility) with your gun, you will be charged with felony murder just like they are.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Serious question - if dad purchased this gun legally, what type of “gun control” are people looking for that would have prevented this?
I think the one time this happened in Scotland, the UK responded in the way you'd expect a modern nation to respond. We'll probably get looser restrictions on conceal carry so that good guys with a gun can play action hero.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Serious question - if dad purchased this gun legally, what type of “gun control” are people looking for that would have prevented this?
Extend the felony murder law to include weapons in a shared household.
If a person under your guardianship and residing in your household kills another person in a public building or grounds (hospital, school, post office, airport, military facility) with your gun, you will be charged with felony murder just like they are.
Yup. Hold the owner accountable.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Serious question - if dad purchased this gun legally, what type of “gun control” are people looking for that would have prevented this?
Extend the felony murder law to include weapons in a shared household.
If a person under your guardianship and residing in your household kills another person in a public building or grounds (hospital, school, post office, airport, military facility) with your gun, you will be charged with felony murder just like they are.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Serious question - if dad purchased this gun legally, what type of “gun control” are people looking for that would have prevented this?
Extend the felony murder law to include weapons in a shared household.
If a person under your guardianship and residing in your household kills another person in a public building or grounds (hospital, school, post office, airport, military facility) with your gun, you will be charged with felony murder just like they are.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Rs will just say it was all an act and a ploy to sabotage gun rights.
Not a GOPer but its weird you're trying to 'nationalize' this tragedy when the mass shooting happened in a local area? Oakland County, Michigan is actually one of the only reliably blue counties. Went for HRC in 2016 and Biden in 2020.
Maybe its time to talk about personal values, gun violence in the white community, and slack parenting that allowed the shooter to 'play' domestic terrorist with molotov cocktails in his backyard?
The comment thread on Twitter is saying the title of that post was edited after the shooting - so it’s likely fake.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Rs will just say it was all an act and a ploy to sabotage gun rights.
Not a GOPer but its weird you're trying to 'nationalize' this tragedy when the mass shooting happened in a local area? Oakland County, Michigan is actually one of the only reliably blue counties. Went for HRC in 2016 and Biden in 2020.
Maybe its time to talk about personal values, gun violence in the white community, and slack parenting that allowed the shooter to 'play' domestic terrorist with molotov cocktails in his backyard?
Anonymous wrote:Serious question - if dad purchased this gun legally, what type of “gun control” are people looking for that would have prevented this?
Anonymous wrote:Serious question - if dad purchased this gun legally, what type of “gun control” are people looking for that would have prevented this?
Anonymous wrote:Rs will just say it was all an act and a ploy to sabotage gun rights.