Anonymous wrote:Most of the posters on here bash it because of the cost. They are doing the same thing in the Michigan thread. Some can swing it, and some can't. Just because you can't swing it doesn't make it a bad school. Our kids didn't look at it. We were lucky they weren't interested because we couldn't have swung it.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Spoiled rich kid school
Oh, you mean Harvard? Duke? Basically any selective and expensive private? Let’s not get it twisted. Just because Larlo has taken the greatest “rigor,” tested well, and has spikey ECs doesn’t mean he’s not a spoiled hot house flower cultivated since birth. It’s damn near impossible to amass the type of credentials so many on this board feel are the only ones worthy of elite college admissions without significant resources. Nobody wants to admit that, though.
Anonymous wrote:I had Bucknell, Trinity (CT) and Williams on my radar screen as a college applicant during the 1990’s. Back then, the “gap” between Bucknell and most SLAC’s didn’t seem that significant.
Anonymous wrote:Spoiled rich kid school
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:You all are zero fun. Bucknell sounds awesome.
Lame DCUM moms.
+1
Bucknell is a GREAT school. It gets horrible reviews on this site but it is a wholesome, clean cut community where many kids thrive.
Anonymous wrote:Sounds like the biggest sin Bucknellians have committed is they are not on their knees apologizing for having testicles.