Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

This woman has zero credibility
She was in prison for defrauding elderly people.

Weird, usually people who do that get pardons from Trump.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

People need to add some context to the tweets other than the link. Lots of browsers don't open Twitter links natively.

Sorry to pick on yours.

Here's what it says:

BREAKING NYT:

Trump has discussed firing Pam Bondi in recent days as he grows frustrated with her leadership at the Justice Department and her handling of the Epstein files, according to four people familiar with the conversations.

What did he want her to do differently with regard to the files? She had everything connected to him covered up. What more did he want?

He wanted her to.make Democrats drink the same Kool aid the moronic MAGA a$$kissing GOP House members drank.

Anonymous wrote:Have there been any real bombshells about the President in the files released so far? Seemed far more problematic for Clinton.

You and trump crossing your ankles, fingers and eyes begging for this to be true!

It isn't and you that Bill Clinton has been exonerated
Hillary was never involved with Epstein and apparently only subpoenaed so Mace could ask her stupid questions.

Anonymous wrote:Have there been any real bombshells about the President in the files released so far? Seemed far more problematic for Clinton.

If full teams are needed to redact Trump's name, then it's pretty clear that there are more Trump bombshells in the Epstein files than there are currently in Iran.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

People need to add some context to the tweets other than the link. Lots of browsers don't open Twitter links natively.

Sorry to pick on yours.

Here's what it says:

BREAKING NYT:

Trump has discussed firing Pam Bondi in recent days as he grows frustrated with her leadership at the Justice Department and her handling of the Epstein files, according to four people familiar with the conversations.

What did he want her to do differently with regard to the files? She had everything connected to him covered up. What more did he want?

Anonymous wrote:

This woman has zero credibility
She was in prison for defrauding elderly people.

Anonymous wrote:Have there been any real bombshells about the President in the files released so far? Seemed far more problematic for Clinton.

No, Clinton was exonerated and everyone knows that the DOJ was working around the clock on the Trump child rape coverup.

Have there been any real bombshells about the President in the files released so far? Seemed far more problematic for Clinton.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Is the Barr Family Blocking The Epstein Investigation Because It Would Expose What's Being Built Right Now?

There is a LOT of very important information here.

https://open.substack.com/pub/kaitjustice/p/epstein-donald-bill-barr?r=12tbbv&utm_medium=ios

Too long and convoluted.

You need a graphic novel or coloring book?

Anonymous wrote:

People need to add some context to the tweets other than the link. Lots of browsers don't open Twitter links natively.

Sorry to pick on yours.

Here's what it says:

BREAKING NYT:

Trump has discussed firing Pam Bondi in recent days as he grows frustrated with her leadership at the Justice Department and her handling of the Epstein files, according to four people familiar with the conversations.

Anonymous wrote:Is the Barr Family Blocking The Epstein Investigation Because It Would Expose What's Being Built Right Now?

There is a LOT of very important information here.

https://open.substack.com/pub/kaitjustice/p/epstein-donald-bill-barr?r=12tbbv&utm_medium=ios

That is jaw-dropping. So much I didn’t know about the larger network of government espionage. What an effort to put it all together!

Yes, like a PP said, the piece is long and convoluted. And like most efforts like this, I think the author goes about 20% too far (a random estimate) by mistaking genuine coincidences for material ties. Still, if even 80% is true….

I tend to be knee-jerk skeptical of any theories that involve murdering civilians to cover up crimes. But I started thinking of Danny Casolaro even before the piece mentioned him. I read up on his story a few years ago because I once had his brother as a doctor, and I came to believe 100% that Casolaro was murdered to cover up the crimes he was investigating. There are enough dodgy facts around Epstein’s death that I’m starting to question that one as well.

Anonymous wrote:Is the Barr Family Blocking The Epstein Investigation Because It Would Expose What's Being Built Right Now?

There is a LOT of very important information here.

https://open.substack.com/pub/kaitjustice/p/epstein-donald-bill-barr?r=12tbbv&utm_medium=ios

It's been eye-opening learning about this web of connections. We've basically been in an oligarchy for decades. Then, add in Lutnick and it all starts to come together. There was an FBI report that Cantor Fitzgerald was engaged in criminal activity and was nearly insolvent before 9/11. Now, he is apparently Trump's handler --- look at him standing over Trump in the Oval Office all the time.

Then add in Kushner and Erika Kirk.