Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:For those of you posting a lot - do you care more about the celeb aspect of this case or the legal aspects?

Legal, but the movie-making aspects of it are fun. Less the celeb angle than thinking about these legal issues within the context of Hollywood and film making -- it's more interesting to look at a workplace conflict that happened in a creative workplace with creative people than if this were, say, a paper company. But I'd be interested in the legal aspects even if it were a paper company.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The Lively poster(s) is fascinating. I cannot believe anyone is so invested they write paragraph upon paragraph multiple times attempting to change the narrative. Originally kept responding misogyny was the reason anyone wouldn't support Lively. Then became obsessed with the birth scene. Then it was showing the home birth video. Ew ew ew. Got called out as a bot or pr and proceeded to call Baldoni posters bots. Baldoni was a deviant serial harraser. That didn't take so even if it was a misunderstanding he still ran a terrible set and he should've played ball and appeased Lively's demands. He is weak and ineffectual but enough of a bully to harass Blake and other actresses. My favorite was the "good-faith" attempt to meet other posters in person. Who would actually say yes to that?

You are confusing multiple people, but yes, let’s just look at the thousands of posts that three Baldoni supporters have written here making crazier claims than that about Lively and insisting, for example, that some Lively supporter was tracking their location through comments here somehow. Even more fascinating!

Is it three? I'm convinced it's one, maybe two. The tone is exactly the same in every single post.

Far more than 3 :)

Sure just like Free Diddy protestors

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The Lively poster(s) is fascinating. I cannot believe anyone is so invested they write paragraph upon paragraph multiple times attempting to change the narrative. Originally kept responding misogyny was the reason anyone wouldn't support Lively. Then became obsessed with the birth scene. Then it was showing the home birth video. Ew ew ew. Got called out as a bot or pr and proceeded to call Baldoni posters bots. Baldoni was a deviant serial harraser. That didn't take so even if it was a misunderstanding he still ran a terrible set and he should've played ball and appeased Lively's demands. He is weak and ineffectual but enough of a bully to harass Blake and other actresses. My favorite was the "good-faith" attempt to meet other posters in person. Who would actually say yes to that?

You are confusing multiple people, but yes, let’s just look at the thousands of posts that three Baldoni supporters have written here making crazier claims than that about Lively and insisting, for example, that some Lively supporter was tracking their location through comments here somehow. Even more fascinating!

Is it three? I'm convinced it's one, maybe two. The tone is exactly the same in every single post.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:For those of you posting a lot - do you care more about the celeb aspect of this case or the legal aspects?

Legal, but the movie-making aspects of it are fun. Less the celeb angle than thinking about these legal issues within the context of Hollywood and film making -- it's more interesting to look at a workplace conflict that happened in a creative workplace with creative people than if this were, say, a paper company. But I'd be interested in the legal aspects even if it were a paper company.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The Lively poster(s) is fascinating. I cannot believe anyone is so invested they write paragraph upon paragraph multiple times attempting to change the narrative. Originally kept responding misogyny was the reason anyone wouldn't support Lively. Then became obsessed with the birth scene. Then it was showing the home birth video. Ew ew ew. Got called out as a bot or pr and proceeded to call Baldoni posters bots. Baldoni was a deviant serial harraser. That didn't take so even if it was a misunderstanding he still ran a terrible set and he should've played ball and appeased Lively's demands. He is weak and ineffectual but enough of a bully to harass Blake and other actresses. My favorite was the "good-faith" attempt to meet other posters in person. Who would actually say yes to that?

You are confusing multiple people, but yes, let’s just look at the thousands of posts that three Baldoni supporters have written here making crazier claims than that about Lively and insisting, for example, that some Lively supporter was tracking their location through comments here somehow. Even more fascinating!

Is it three? I'm convinced it's one, maybe two. The tone is exactly the same in every single post.

Far more than 3 :)

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The Lively poster(s) is fascinating. I cannot believe anyone is so invested they write paragraph upon paragraph multiple times attempting to change the narrative. Originally kept responding misogyny was the reason anyone wouldn't support Lively. Then became obsessed with the birth scene. Then it was showing the home birth video. Ew ew ew. Got called out as a bot or pr and proceeded to call Baldoni posters bots. Baldoni was a deviant serial harraser. That didn't take so even if it was a misunderstanding he still ran a terrible set and he should've played ball and appeased Lively's demands. He is weak and ineffectual but enough of a bully to harass Blake and other actresses. My favorite was the "good-faith" attempt to meet other posters in person. Who would actually say yes to that?

You are confusing multiple people, but yes, let’s just look at the thousands of posts that three Baldoni supporters have written here making crazier claims than that about Lively and insisting, for example, that some Lively supporter was tracking their location through comments here somehow. Even more fascinating!

Anonymous wrote:For those of you posting a lot - do you care more about the celeb aspect of this case or the legal aspects?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The Lively poster(s) is fascinating. I cannot believe anyone is so invested they write paragraph upon paragraph multiple times attempting to change the narrative. Originally kept responding misogyny was the reason anyone wouldn't support Lively. Then became obsessed with the birth scene. Then it was showing the home birth video. Ew ew ew. Got called out as a bot or pr and proceeded to call Baldoni posters bots. Baldoni was a deviant serial harraser. That didn't take so even if it was a misunderstanding he still ran a terrible set and he should've played ball and appeased Lively's demands. He is weak and ineffectual but enough of a bully to harass Blake and other actresses. My favorite was the "good-faith" attempt to meet other posters in person. Who would actually say yes to that?

Ha, there’s a post on Reddit noting deauxmoi seems to be following a playbook similar to what we see on here. Long blathering, twisting and turning, trying to spin this as Blake is winning. The latest is attempting to show freedman is ‘struggling’ in court, implying Baldoni is on the ropes. Similar to the poster here who obsessed over the protective order being such a loss for Freedman (as if this is his personal case). Who is now obsessed with noting venable hasn’t moved to rescind their motion to quash. Their motion was weak and it set up freedman’s letter perfectly. That along with TSs harsh PR statement and total silence on Fresdmans allegations makes clear where Blake stands.

Someone needs to give her some decent advice and tell her to quit before this gets worse

The wordy spam is to be pump and juke analytics they’re billing the two birdbrains for. It’s hilarious to know this worthless nonsense is costing them big bucks.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The Lively poster(s) is fascinating. I cannot believe anyone is so invested they write paragraph upon paragraph multiple times attempting to change the narrative. Originally kept responding misogyny was the reason anyone wouldn't support Lively. Then became obsessed with the birth scene. Then it was showing the home birth video. Ew ew ew. Got called out as a bot or pr and proceeded to call Baldoni posters bots. Baldoni was a deviant serial harraser. That didn't take so even if it was a misunderstanding he still ran a terrible set and he should've played ball and appeased Lively's demands. He is weak and ineffectual but enough of a bully to harass Blake and other actresses. My favorite was the "good-faith" attempt to meet other posters in person. Who would actually say yes to that?

You are confusing multiple people, but yes, let’s just look at the thousands of posts that three Baldoni supporters have written here making crazier claims than that about Lively and insisting, for example, that some Lively supporter was tracking their location through comments here somehow. Even more fascinating!

Is it three? I'm convinced it's one, maybe two. The tone is exactly the same in every single post.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The Lively poster(s) is fascinating. I cannot believe anyone is so invested they write paragraph upon paragraph multiple times attempting to change the narrative. Originally kept responding misogyny was the reason anyone wouldn't support Lively. Then became obsessed with the birth scene. Then it was showing the home birth video. Ew ew ew. Got called out as a bot or pr and proceeded to call Baldoni posters bots. Baldoni was a deviant serial harraser. That didn't take so even if it was a misunderstanding he still ran a terrible set and he should've played ball and appeased Lively's demands. He is weak and ineffectual but enough of a bully to harass Blake and other actresses. My favorite was the "good-faith" attempt to meet other posters in person. Who would actually say yes to that?

Ha, there’s a post on Reddit noting deauxmoi seems to be following a playbook similar to what we see on here. Long blathering, twisting and turning, trying to spin this as Blake is winning. The latest is attempting to show freedman is ‘struggling’ in court, implying Baldoni is on the ropes. Similar to the poster here who obsessed over the protective order being such a loss for Freedman (as if this is his personal case). Who is now obsessed with noting venable hasn’t moved to rescind their motion to quash. Their motion was weak and it set up freedman’s letter perfectly. That along with TSs harsh PR statement and total silence on Fresdmans allegations makes clear where Blake stands.

Someone needs to give her some decent advice and tell her to quit before this gets worse

Anonymous wrote:Right on cue. Accusing others of doing the same thing they were accused of. And the accompanying buddy post agreeing. The most fascinating!

Anonymous wrote:The Lively poster(s) is fascinating. I cannot believe anyone is so invested they write paragraph upon paragraph multiple times attempting to change the narrative. Originally kept responding misogyny was the reason anyone wouldn't support Lively. Then became obsessed with the birth scene. Then it was showing the home birth video. Ew ew ew. Got called out as a bot or pr and proceeded to call Baldoni posters bots. Baldoni was a deviant serial harraser. That didn't take so even if it was a misunderstanding he still ran a terrible set and he should've played ball and appeased Lively's demands. He is weak and ineffectual but enough of a bully to harass Blake and other actresses. My favorite was the "good-faith" attempt to meet other posters in person. Who would actually say yes to that?