Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:if you can get inside the courtyards of the yale residential colleges - and I think you might only walk through one of them on a tour - they're pretty dreamy. Oxford rip off, sure, but a v good one.
Maybe i toured the wrong residential college, but I didn’t find Saybrook or Pauli Murray nice. Just a difference in personal tastes I’m sure, not like the kids are suffering.
What have you seen that is nicer than Saybrook or Pauli Murray?
Anonymous wrote:Pepperdine. Ok buildings. But you can’t beat that view.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:JMU
Kidding right? It is bisected by an interstate and is pretty ugly otherwise
+1
If a college wasn't founded in the 1800s or earlier, chances are it shouldn't be on this list. There are always exceptions but generally newer schools like JMU just don't have charm.
DP. Totally disagree. It’s a lovely campus.
Lovely like GMU or Christopher Newport, maybe. Not lovely like older schools. Have you toured LACs, even the ones in VA like Richmond and W&L? I guess it's a taste thing but there are places with much more classic looks.
Agree to disagree. I found W&L to be pretty, but wasn’t impressed with Richmond. A school doesn’t have to be old to be beautiful.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:JMU
Kidding right? It is bisected by an interstate and is pretty ugly otherwise
+1
If a college wasn't founded in the 1800s or earlier, chances are it shouldn't be on this list. There are always exceptions but generally newer schools like JMU just don't have charm.
DP. Totally disagree. It’s a lovely campus.
Lovely like GMU or Christopher Newport, maybe. Not lovely like older schools. Have you toured LACs, even the ones in VA like Richmond and W&L? I guess it's a taste thing but there are places with much more classic looks.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:JMU
Kidding right? It is bisected by an interstate and is pretty ugly otherwise
+1
If a college wasn't founded in the 1800s or earlier, chances are it shouldn't be on this list. There are always exceptions but generally newer schools like JMU just don't have charm.

Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:if you can get inside the courtyards of the yale residential colleges - and I think you might only walk through one of them on a tour - they're pretty dreamy. Oxford rip off, sure, but a v good one.
Maybe i toured the wrong residential college, but I didn’t find Saybrook or Pauli Murray nice. Just a difference in personal tastes I’m sure, not like the kids are suffering.
Anonymous wrote:if you can get inside the courtyards of the yale residential colleges - and I think you might only walk through one of them on a tour - they're pretty dreamy. Oxford rip off, sure, but a v good one.
Anonymous wrote:if you can get inside the courtyards of the yale residential colleges - and I think you might only walk through one of them on a tour - they're pretty dreamy. Oxford rip off, sure, but a v good one.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Northwestern and Columbia were dismal.
Agreed! Just look, for example, at their crappy libraries! 🙄
![]()
![]()
Anonymous wrote:
Northwestern and Columbia were dismal.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:JMU
Kidding right? It is bisected by an interstate and is pretty ugly otherwise
Anonymous wrote:My DD hates it but fell in love with Kenyon, just a gorgeous school!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I think Yale has the best architecture.
I guess vision isn’t your strength.