Anonymous wrote:Why didn't the prosecutors strike juror 1261, or even the judge? Why didn't the other jurors complain to the judge? Is the foreperson such a tyrant that it sways the verdict? This is an outrage every which way.
Anonymous wrote:So much lack of justice everywhere today, I rate this a 2/10. Yawn.
Anonymous wrote:The greatest crisis the USA faces is the jury crisis. Who in his right mind would request a jury trial today with the current crop of potential jurors?
Anonymous wrote:Why didn't the prosecutors strike juror 1261, or even the judge? Why didn't the other jurors complain to the judge? Is the foreperson such a tyrant that it sways the verdict? This is an outrage every which way.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Explain why his own lawyers would allow juror 1261. I find it shocking.
Either because they wanted it in the back pocket to try for a mistrial later or because they were wholly incompetent.
Anonymous wrote:Explain why his own lawyers would allow juror 1261. I find it shocking.
Anonymous wrote:Juror 1261: https://thehill.com/opinion/criminal-justice/483210-juror-1261-in-roger-stones-case-was-justice-undone
Anonymous wrote:+1. Federal prosecutors don’t seek sentences below the federal guidelines, which are set by Congress, for defendants who don’t plead guilty and/or provide substantial cooperation. Stone did the opposite. This is basic stuff.
You forget--the "victim" said that he did not take Stone's threat seriously. That was the basis of asking for the higher penalty.
And, this was a first time offender. They usually take that into consideration, as well. No danger to society.
Meanwhile, Comey and Clapper and Brennan are still walking free.