Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Keep posting, GFR coaches. Riverbend will keep building while a quarter of your club leaves every year.
lol even last year during the hostile takeover attempt not even close to a quarter of the club left. and a lot of them are back now after spending one single season in the nightmare that was loudoun east now known as riverbend.
It was posted here that GFR shared at a meeting that the retention last year was 71%. If 71% stayed, 29% left.
Those players left BECAUSE of the chaos caused by ML's board putsch attempt right at tryout season, so it was unclear who would be running the organization and who would be coaching. All of those issues are favorable resolved at GFR now--stable new leadership and strong coaching slate--and ML is no longer there. Why would they now leave to go to a club under his questionable leadership?
No left because RS let NM run the club into the ground for his own personal gain. The “coup” was trying to stop that. You thought last year was bad wait until GFR sees their retention numbers this year.
Only a clown who doesn’t know soccer would think HM is a better option than NM. And that’s who’s running R(b)FC now…
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Keep posting, GFR coaches. Riverbend will keep building while a quarter of your club leaves every year.
lol even last year during the hostile takeover attempt not even close to a quarter of the club left. and a lot of them are back now after spending one single season in the nightmare that was loudoun east now known as riverbend.
It was posted here that GFR shared at a meeting that the retention last year was 71%. If 71% stayed, 29% left.
Those players left BECAUSE of the chaos caused by ML's board putsch attempt right at tryout season, so it was unclear who would be running the organization and who would be coaching. All of those issues are favorable resolved at GFR now--stable new leadership and strong coaching slate--and ML is no longer there. Why would they now leave to go to a club under his questionable leadership?
No left because RS let NM run the club into the ground for his own personal gain. The “coup” was trying to stop that. You thought last year was bad wait until GFR sees their retention numbers this year.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Keep posting, GFR coaches. Riverbend will keep building while a quarter of your club leaves every year.
lol even last year during the hostile takeover attempt not even close to a quarter of the club left. and a lot of them are back now after spending one single season in the nightmare that was loudoun east now known as riverbend.
It was posted here that GFR shared at a meeting that the retention last year was 71%. If 71% stayed, 29% left.
Those players left BECAUSE of the chaos caused by ML's board putsch attempt right at tryout season, so it was unclear who would be running the organization and who would be coaching. All of those issues are favorable resolved at GFR now--stable new leadership and strong coaching slate--and ML is no longer there. Why would they now leave to go to a club under his questionable leadership?
No left because RS let NM run the club into the ground for his own personal gain. The “coup” was trying to stop that. You thought last year was bad wait until GFR sees their retention numbers this year.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Keep posting, GFR coaches. Riverbend will keep building while a quarter of your club leaves every year.
lol even last year during the hostile takeover attempt not even close to a quarter of the club left. and a lot of them are back now after spending one single season in the nightmare that was loudoun east now known as riverbend.
It was posted here that GFR shared at a meeting that the retention last year was 71%. If 71% stayed, 29% left.
Those players left BECAUSE of the chaos caused by ML's board putsch attempt right at tryout season, so it was unclear who would be running the organization and who would be coaching. All of those issues are favorable resolved at GFR now--stable new leadership and strong coaching slate--and ML is no longer there. Why would they now leave to go to a club under his questionable leadership?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Keep posting, GFR coaches. Riverbend will keep building while a quarter of your club leaves every year.
lol even last year during the hostile takeover attempt not even close to a quarter of the club left. and a lot of them are back now after spending one single season in the nightmare that was loudoun east now known as riverbend.
It was posted here that GFR shared at a meeting that the retention last year was 71%. If 71% stayed, 29% left.
Those players left BECAUSE of the chaos caused by ML's board putsch attempt right at tryout season, so it was unclear who would be running the organization and who would be coaching. All of those issues are favorable resolved at GFR now--stable new leadership and strong coaching slate--and ML is no longer there. Why would they now leave to go to a club under his questionable leadership?
Because he's laying so low people don't even realize he's involved.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Keep posting, GFR coaches. Riverbend will keep building while a quarter of your club leaves every year.
lol even last year during the hostile takeover attempt not even close to a quarter of the club left. and a lot of them are back now after spending one single season in the nightmare that was loudoun east now known as riverbend.
It was posted here that GFR shared at a meeting that the retention last year was 71%. If 71% stayed, 29% left.
Those players left BECAUSE of the chaos caused by ML's board putsch attempt right at tryout season, so it was unclear who would be running the organization and who would be coaching. All of those issues are favorable resolved at GFR now--stable new leadership and strong coaching slate--and ML is no longer there. Why would they now leave to go to a club under his questionable leadership?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Keep posting, GFR coaches. Riverbend will keep building while a quarter of your club leaves every year.
lol even last year during the hostile takeover attempt not even close to a quarter of the club left. and a lot of them are back now after spending one single season in the nightmare that was loudoun east now known as riverbend.
It was posted here that GFR shared at a meeting that the retention last year was 71%. If 71% stayed, 29% left.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Keep posting, GFR coaches. Riverbend will keep building while a quarter of your club leaves every year.
lol even last year during the hostile takeover attempt not even close to a quarter of the club left. and a lot of them are back now after spending one single season in the nightmare that was loudoun east now known as riverbend.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Keep posting, GFR coaches. Riverbend will keep building while a quarter of your club leaves every year.
lol even last year during the hostile takeover attempt not even close to a quarter of the club left. and a lot of them are back now after spending one single season in the nightmare that was loudoun east now known as riverbend.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Someone just said there were 20 players to tryout for 12 teams. Even if all 20 of those players were from GF it's pretty laughable to think that would be a threat. I know the McLean families are nothing but annoyed by this "club" and the shady way they are going about things and trying to get field space.
What does McLean have to do with anything?
Anonymous wrote:Someone just said there were 20 players to tryout for 12 teams. Even if all 20 of those players were from GF it's pretty laughable to think that would be a threat. I know the McLean families are nothing but annoyed by this "club" and the shady way they are going about things and trying to get field space.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Keep posting, GFR coaches. Riverbend will keep building while a quarter of your club leaves every year.
lol even last year during the hostile takeover attempt not even close to a quarter of the club left. and a lot of them are back now after spending one single season in the nightmare that was loudoun east now known as riverbend.
It was posted here that GFR shared at a meeting that the retention last year was 71%. If 71% stayed, 29% left.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Keep posting, GFR coaches. Riverbend will keep building while a quarter of your club leaves every year.
lol even last year during the hostile takeover attempt not even close to a quarter of the club left. and a lot of them are back now after spending one single season in the nightmare that was loudoun east now known as riverbend.
Anonymous wrote:Keep posting, GFR coaches. Riverbend will keep building while a quarter of your club leaves every year.