Anonymous
03/26/2025 15:06
Subject: Re:SecDef shares US war Plan in Group chat
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I think the bigger issue is that we only found out about this bc Goldberg was brave enough to come forward about it. What else is being discussed via Signal or other unapproved channels?
It is an approved channel.
Approved for what? For classified information?
So far, I have not heard that it is approved for that.
Watch: Someone will probably hastily approve signal for classified info, hoping that politically motivated retroactive approval makes this all go away.
Don’t inadvertently give them any ideas.
Anonymous
03/26/2025 15:05
Subject: Re:SecDef shares US war Plan in Group chat
Anonymous
03/26/2025 15:05
Subject: SecDef shares US war Plan in Group chat
Anonymous wrote:I love that The Atlantic called the WH's bluff that the intel wasn't classified.
WH: it wasn't classified intel! it's a nothingburger by a woke Biden lover, loser fake news journalist!
The Atlantic: bet. here's are all the receipts - the full Signal text chain that details the times the bombs will start flying and the locations of the target assets.
This entire Administration is made up of absolute buffoons. Did no one on Trump's team think The Atlantic would release all the receipts if they kept lying about the intel not being classified? Honestly? GTFO. Not one person thought, 'gee, maybe we shouldn't try to spin it this way, guys...'
Yeah. I don’t think the administration thought it would roll out like this. They counted on The Atlantic “doing the right thing” and not reveal the intel. Stupid of them to lie about it not being classified. They probably need to realize that the libs have had enough now.
Anonymous
03/26/2025 15:04
Subject: Re:SecDef shares US war Plan in Group chat
Why are they calling it a “mishap” when it was intentional.
Anonymous
Anonymous
03/26/2025 15:04
Subject: Re:SecDef shares US war Plan in Group chat
LOL this is such a hoot. Watch Waltz make no sense trying to make sense of how Goldberg's number ended up on his phone and in the group chat. Apparently it "got sucked in." Remember that Waltz claims he has never met Goldberg. To her credit, Laura Ingraham was pretty relentless in pinning him down.
h[twitter]ttps://x.com/BehizyTweets/status/1904678650269532461[/twitter]
h[twitter]ttps://x.com/BehizyTweets/status/1904678650269532461[/twitter]
Anonymous
03/26/2025 15:03
Subject: Re:SecDef shares US war Plan in Group chat
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Did anyone catch this? Wild!
On March 14, 2025— 11 days before the published leak, Tulsi Gabbard wrote on X:
"Any unauthorized release of classified information is a violation of the law and will be treated as such."
“Our nation's Intelligence Community must be focused on our national security mission. Politically motivated leaks undermine our national security and the trust of the American people, and will not be tolerated.”
“Unfortunately, such leaks have become commonplace with no investigation or accountability. That ends now. We know of and are aggressively pursuing recent leakers from within the Intelligence Community and will hold them accountable.”
Yeah Tim Miller flagged that like instantly.
Of course Tulsi was speaking about the leaks about ICE raids. It doesn’t occur to them that there will be leaks when they invite Dr Phil and his crew or when ICE agents wear their flare and hang around Wawa lots for hours to meet up. Every town has a Facebook or Reddit thread and people call out when they are spotted.
Anonymous
03/26/2025 15:03
Subject: Re:SecDef shares US war Plan in Group chat
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:GA Senator Jon Osseff should be on everyone’s radar. He’s got what it takes to run in 2028. Young gun slaughtered them.
Bringing back to the top of the thread. I want this guy to get the exposure he needs.
Thank you. I am so relieved to see this. At least someone is bringing the heat on this.
Sen Osseff showed up on my TikTok feed giving the business and I was there for it. Wasn’t too familiar with him before.
Anonymous
03/26/2025 15:03
Subject: Re:SecDef shares US war Plan in Group chat
They’re just giving SNL an entire episodes worth of material
Anonymous
03/26/2025 15:02
Subject: SecDef shares US war Plan in Group chat
I love that The Atlantic called the WH's bluff that the intel wasn't classified.
WH: it wasn't classified intel! it's a nothingburger by a woke Biden lover, loser fake news journalist!
The Atlantic: bet. here's are all the receipts - the full Signal text chain that details the times the bombs will start flying and the locations of the target assets.
This entire Administration is made up of absolute buffoons. Did no one on Trump's team think The Atlantic would release all the receipts if they kept lying about the intel not being classified? Honestly? GTFO. Not one person thought, 'gee, maybe we shouldn't try to spin it this way, guys...'
WH: it wasn't classified intel! it's a nothingburger by a woke Biden lover, loser fake news journalist!
The Atlantic: bet. here's are all the receipts - the full Signal text chain that details the times the bombs will start flying and the locations of the target assets.
This entire Administration is made up of absolute buffoons. Did no one on Trump's team think The Atlantic would release all the receipts if they kept lying about the intel not being classified? Honestly? GTFO. Not one person thought, 'gee, maybe we shouldn't try to spin it this way, guys...'
Anonymous
03/26/2025 15:02
Subject: SecDef shares US war Plan in Group chat
arrogance and stupidity is an unbeatable combination
Anonymous
03/26/2025 15:01
Subject: SecDef shares US war Plan in Group chat
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Are congressional republicans so beholden to Elon for funding their re-election campaigns that they can’t realize that this is one of the most egregious security breaches in recent memory and act to investigate appropriately?
Many congressional Republicans are saying exactly that. But what do you think they should do? Impeach Hesgeth? He's a cabinet member, not some junior person. The president can fire him but hasn't (yet). They can ask him to resign but he won't (yet).
Wickers and Rogers are going to investigate. They are doing what they can do.
No. “Requesting an IG” look into this is not nearly enough. They need to have hearings. Watergate type hearings.
+ buzzillions yes yes YES!!!
What's to investigate exactly? There's no mystery. Below is proof that Waltz added Greenberg to the group chat. Probably inadvertently.
What indeed.
The degree to which the administration has bypassed security and record keeping protocols and broken many, many federal laws. Then it can be referred to a judge appointed prosecutor since the DOJ and FBI are clearly not disinterested parties.
Anonymous
03/26/2025 15:00
Subject: Re:SecDef shares US war Plan in Group chat
Anonymous
Anonymous
03/26/2025 14:59
Subject: SecDef shares US war Plan in Group chat
Doesn't each user set their own handle?Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Were we told how Goldberg was added to the group? I use Signal for work sometimes and to add group members, I usually type in a name, which pulls the contact from my phone contacts, or I type in a phone number, if that person isn't in my contacts. So Waltz either had Goldberg in his contacts, but he's said he wouldn't know who Goldberg was even if he saw him, or he typed a phone number meant for someone else, but it ended up being Goldberg's number.
I'm open to other suggestions about how people get added to groups on Signal.
He had Goldberg in his contacts, most likely. Otherwise, he mistyped a number and it just happened to be an Atlantic editor? No way.
If it weren't in his contacts, that number wouldn't have had JG as its avatar in the chat.