Have you read this thread? Lots of people are basically saying men shouldn’t be in any field working with children or they are some kind of creep.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:She was basically responding to the complete hatred or bashing of males that want to get in the field of working with children. See the ironyAnonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I wonder what percentage of posters here saying that basically all male teachers are pedos (and if not, they deserve the presumption that they are) are SAHMs who don’t get off their asses but expect the schools to raise their kids so they can attend to the important and incredibly complicated work of “homemaking” and haven’t meaningfully contributed to society since their high school band’s car wash fundraiser 20 years ago but are quick to shit on teachers based on their gender.
Super curious what the overlap is because I’m guessing it’s pretty high.
Your hatred towards women who don’t work outside the home is next level. Glad you have a place to vent on DCUM.
No - it seemed like a dig towards sahm women and implying they are closed minded and hate men.
Anonymous wrote:The school should have remained closed until all necessary actions were taken. Federal authorities should have inspected the entire building, interviewed all staff and board members regardless of their status, and thoroughly investigated those who were hired, paid, promoted, or favored by this individual. Without these measures, simply convincing terrified parents to resume “business as usual” is deeply irresponsible. Many parents, driven by fear and the need to protect their mental health, may cling to denial about the severity of the case.
This school head held significant power for many years, with the ability to hire staff and access all facilities. Who can argue that he didn’t engage with “like-minded” individuals in real life, as he did online, let them into the school, and lead them to, at the very least, produce explicit photos? As he advised the “agent” online, “…tell the kids it is a game, they will do…” These are 3- to 5-year-old children.
The school’s “business as usual” approach is both harmful and dismissive of the gravity of the situation.
Anonymous wrote:Statistically, you’re more likely to have someone from your family or inner circle abuse your child rather than at school.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:We need to normalize or preempt the ask. I’ve always been too nervous to ask if the door is closed when my DD gets invited to the male counselor’s office for lunch. Too nervous to ask if the male teacher at preschool changed my DD’s clothes after an accident.
I never had reason to believe there was a problem but I wished I just knew the norms and that the (private) school was straight with me from the onset. Send out their policies so no one has to fear judgment or retribution for asking.
This is exactly why I wouldn’t have my preschool child with an unknown male individual.
Parents who think it’s great, you have plenty of opportunities these days. Go at it, and hope for the best.
Anonymous wrote:She was basically responding to the complete hatred or bashing of males that want to get in the field of working with children. See the ironyAnonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I wonder what percentage of posters here saying that basically all male teachers are pedos (and if not, they deserve the presumption that they are) are SAHMs who don’t get off their asses but expect the schools to raise their kids so they can attend to the important and incredibly complicated work of “homemaking” and haven’t meaningfully contributed to society since their high school band’s car wash fundraiser 20 years ago but are quick to shit on teachers based on their gender.
Super curious what the overlap is because I’m guessing it’s pretty high.
Your hatred towards women who don’t work outside the home is next level. Glad you have a place to vent on DCUM.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Why hasn't NCRC provided resources to families and professional help on how to figure out if their children are victims?
This is an important comment that really hasn’t come up here. At least a “we don’t have the answers, but we are going to find out” would be better than “we’re pretty sure he wasn’t alone with kids.” They haven’t expressed a commitment to finding out if Carroll was 1:1 with kids. All they’ve said is he had an “adult facing role.” Countless people at the school are crying out for a third party investigation, which of course they need. Hearing from the school that JC wasn’t alone with kids does not provide the type of clarity and assurance that parents need. It is an expense and an endeavor that is well with the cost. The answers for parents must be crystal clear. The stakes could not be higher.
Anonymous wrote:Why hasn't NCRC provided resources to families and professional help on how to figure out if their children are victims?
She was basically responding to the complete hatred or bashing of males that want to get in the field of working with children. See the ironyAnonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I wonder what percentage of posters here saying that basically all male teachers are pedos (and if not, they deserve the presumption that they are) are SAHMs who don’t get off their asses but expect the schools to raise their kids so they can attend to the important and incredibly complicated work of “homemaking” and haven’t meaningfully contributed to society since their high school band’s car wash fundraiser 20 years ago but are quick to shit on teachers based on their gender.
Super curious what the overlap is because I’m guessing it’s pretty high.
Your hatred towards women who don’t work outside the home is next level. Glad you have a place to vent on DCUM.
Statistically, you’re more likely to have someone from your family or inner circle abuse your child rather than at school.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:We need to normalize or preempt the ask. I’ve always been too nervous to ask if the door is closed when my DD gets invited to the male counselor’s office for lunch. Too nervous to ask if the male teacher at preschool changed my DD’s clothes after an accident.
I never had reason to believe there was a problem but I wished I just knew the norms and that the (private) school was straight with me from the onset. Send out their policies so no one has to fear judgment or retribution for asking.
This is exactly why I wouldn’t have my preschool child with an unknown male individual.
Parents who think it’s great, you have plenty of opportunities these days. Go at it, and hope for the best.
This is one of the best responses ever on this site. Thank you.Anonymous wrote:I wonder what percentage of posters here saying that basically all male teachers are pedos (and if not, they deserve the presumption that they are) are SAHMs who don’t get off their asses but expect the schools to raise their kids so they can attend to the important and incredibly complicated work of “homemaking” and haven’t meaningfully contributed to society since their high school band’s car wash fundraiser 20 years ago but are quick to shit on teachers based on their gender.
Super curious what the overlap is because I’m guessing it’s pretty high.
Anonymous wrote:Obviously not all male teachers are pedos. Not even most. But those that are and traffic in child porn as JC allegedly does likely know each other. These networks have existed all over the world. It strains credulity to think that these pedos operating on the same campuses may not know each other. According to the press release, JC was trying to recruit another abuser and that is the nature of the charges he is facing.