Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Curious to know how people would respond to this question:
If there were concrete evidence that Epstein had been m an intelligence asset or even agent, how would this change things for you?
Would you be more or less angry? How and why?
This is already basically confirmed. No one even takes the time to refute it anymore. Which is why we need to have access to all the files and then the FBI needs to investigate and prosecute all these people.
Okay, but then how does it change things for you? Are you more angry? How or why? Should it be handled differently in some way?
Angrier, because there are even more people to add to the roster of depraved, evil men and more layers of manipulation and abuse.
But I don't really understand this question. What other answer is possible?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Curious to know how people would respond to this question:
If there were concrete evidence that Epstein had been m an intelligence asset or even agent, how would this change things for you?
Would you be more or less angry? How and why?
This is already basically confirmed. No one even takes the time to refute it anymore. Which is why we need to have access to all the files and then the FBI needs to investigate and prosecute all these people.
Okay, but then how does it change things for you? Are you more angry? How or why? Should it be handled differently in some way?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Curious to know how people would respond to this question:
If there were concrete evidence that Epstein had been m an intelligence asset or even agent, how would this change things for you?
Would you be more or less angry? How and why?
This is already basically confirmed. No one even takes the time to refute it anymore. Which is why we need to have access to all the files and then the FBI needs to investigate and prosecute all these people.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Curious to know how people would respond to this question:
If there were concrete evidence that Epstein had been m an intelligence asset or even agent, how would this change things for you?
Would you be more or less angry? How and why?
This is already basically confirmed. No one even takes the time to refute it anymore. Which is why we need to have access to all the files and then the FBI needs to investigate and prosecute all these people.
FBI has been full on participating in the cover up. Connect the dots.
Good point, we are going to need quite the overhaul.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Curious to know how people would respond to this question:
If there were concrete evidence that Epstein had been m an intelligence asset or even agent, how would this change things for you?
Would you be more or less angry? How and why?
This is already basically confirmed. No one even takes the time to refute it anymore. Which is why we need to have access to all the files and then the FBI needs to investigate and prosecute all these people.
FBI has been full on participating in the cover up. Connect the dots.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Curious to know how people would respond to this question:
If there were concrete evidence that Epstein had been m an intelligence asset or even agent, how would this change things for you?
Would you be more or less angry? How and why?
This is already basically confirmed. No one even takes the time to refute it anymore. Which is why we need to have access to all the files and then the FBI needs to investigate and prosecute all these people.
Anonymous wrote:Curious to know how people would respond to this question:
If there were concrete evidence that Epstein had been m an intelligence asset or even agent, how would this change things for you?
Would you be more or less angry? How and why?
Anonymous wrote:
Regardless of $5k or $20k, she’ll blow through that in lawyer costs for a hearing, loss of privacy, and safety issues.