Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:They are redoing the Reno que before Brabrand leaves.

It pays to watch work sessions or pay attention to those who do.

Watched the work session and sounded like they might have an RFP to hire a consultant before Brabrand leaves, not a new queue.

They are inept and dishonest.

They are talking about hiring a consultant for new boundaries.

I can watch again but I’m the cip discussion they just said they were getting going on redoing the que and no mention of hiring it out.

If McLean wants to be prioritized they need to get moving.

I get the sense that someone posting on this thread doesn’t actually want the board to commit to expanding McLean in the near future because they want lots of anger against Elaine so she won’t win again. Actually, I think this person is trying to sink her chances at being the dem-endorsed nominee at all. If she and the board deliver then she is in a stronger position.

I don’t think it’s ethical to discourage the McLean communication from mobilizing to get an expansion because you have a grudge or your own political ambitions. It’s also not necessary.

Enough people are pissed off enough at Elaine that her position is rocky, expansion or no expansion.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:They are redoing the Reno que before Brabrand leaves.

It pays to watch work sessions or pay attention to those who do.

Watched the work session and sounded like they might have an RFP to hire a consultant before Brabrand leaves, not a new queue.

They are inept and dishonest.

They are talking about hiring a consultant for new boundaries.

I can watch again but I’m the cip discussion they just said they were getting going on redoing the que and no mention of hiring it out.

If McLean wants to be prioritized they need to get moving.

I get the sense that someone posting on this thread doesn’t actually want the board to commit to expanding McLean in the near future because they want lots of anger against Elaine so she won’t win again. Actually, I think this person is trying to sink her chances at being the dem-endorsed nominee at all. If she and the board deliver then she is in a stronger position.

I don’t think it’s ethical to discourage the McLean communication from mobilizing to get an expansion because you have a grudge or your own political ambitions. It’s also not necessary.

Enough people are pissed off enough at Elaine that her position is rocky, expansion or no expansion.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:They are redoing the Reno que before Brabrand leaves.

It pays to watch work sessions or pay attention to those who do.

Watched the work session and sounded like they might have an RFP to hire a consultant before Brabrand leaves, not a new queue.

They are inept and dishonest.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:They are redoing the Reno que before Brabrand leaves.

It pays to watch work sessions or pay attention to those who do.

Watched the work session and sounded like they might have an RFP to hire a consultant before Brabrand leaves, not a new queue.

They are inept and dishonest.

Anonymous wrote:They are redoing the Reno que before Brabrand leaves.

It pays to watch work sessions or pay attention to those who do.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Boundary change was needed. McLean was told to wait on a larger conversation years ago, which led to the formation of McSpaces.

\

So elaine's boundary change, negotiated with mcspaces and vance, reduced overcrowding at MHS? The boundary change reduced capacity at MHS by how much? Did it help? If so, please provide more detail so I can understand.

DP, but the MHS enrollment this fall is at an all-time high with 2368 kids in December.

MHS has been overcrowded for a decade, and they've had plenty of time to adjust the CIP to budget for an addition to the school.

When asked what she's doing to fulfill her campaign pledge to secure funding for a permanent addition to the school (which has the least permanent learning space of any high school in FCPS, but an above-average enrollment), Elaine tells MHS that "she's only one of 12 School Board members." Seems like being a Democrat on a School Board with 12 Democratic members might position Elaine to actually advocate for one of her Dranesville schools, but the only schools in FCPS she apparently cares about are TJ and Langley.

As for McSpaces, they seem to have disappeared from the face of the earth. My understanding is the leader is a loyal Democrat unwilling to call out Tholen's failures.

vance proved himself to be a coward during the boundary process - he knew elaine was selling him a bad deal but he did not have the guts to call her out, or even ask her tough questions.

I hear he’s a staunch democrat. He probably doesn’t want to do anything that weakens the possibility of the next dem candidate for Dranesville.

Making a huge fuss about Elaine and the school board will might result in hurting the rep of Fairfax dems and give republicans ammo for the next election.

You have to sympathize with his position.

Sympathize with him? Noooo way. As the public face and the mover behind the scenes, he willingly and knowingly sold a bad deal to everyone. He lied, he never held elaine to account for her decisions, and ultimately he totally failed to reduce capacity at MHS. I go back/forth on whether he fooled everyone or if elaine made him look like the biggest fool of all.

Sympathize with him? Not a chance - I blame him for failing to do what was right, for pushing for real change, and for blindly supporting elaine. He and elaine share blame for wasting everyones time on a boundary that did nothing when we should have focused on a renovation.

So now that Fcps is going to redo the Reno q will McLean put REAL—“do this for us or we don’t vote dem for Dranesville OR at large—pressure on the school board to get McLean the desperately needed expansion or will they fold like a cheap suit?

If Elaine gets MHS on the reno q in 2023, then MHS will be lucky to see the reno complete before 2030 AND she will have wasted 3 years (2020-2023) of time doing nothing. Score that how you will, but I as a Dem, will not vote for her even if she does get MHS on the reno q. Too little too late.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Boundary change was needed. McLean was told to wait on a larger conversation years ago, which led to the formation of McSpaces.

\

So elaine's boundary change, negotiated with mcspaces and vance, reduced overcrowding at MHS? The boundary change reduced capacity at MHS by how much? Did it help? If so, please provide more detail so I can understand.

DP, but the MHS enrollment this fall is at an all-time high with 2368 kids in December.

MHS has been overcrowded for a decade, and they've had plenty of time to adjust the CIP to budget for an addition to the school.

When asked what she's doing to fulfill her campaign pledge to secure funding for a permanent addition to the school (which has the least permanent learning space of any high school in FCPS, but an above-average enrollment), Elaine tells MHS that "she's only one of 12 School Board members." Seems like being a Democrat on a School Board with 12 Democratic members might position Elaine to actually advocate for one of her Dranesville schools, but the only schools in FCPS she apparently cares about are TJ and Langley.

As for McSpaces, they seem to have disappeared from the face of the earth. My understanding is the leader is a loyal Democrat unwilling to call out Tholen's failures.

vance proved himself to be a coward during the boundary process - he knew elaine was selling him a bad deal but he did not have the guts to call her out, or even ask her tough questions.

I hear he’s a staunch democrat. He probably doesn’t want to do anything that weakens the possibility of the next dem candidate for Dranesville.

Making a huge fuss about Elaine and the school board will might result in hurting the rep of Fairfax dems and give republicans ammo for the next election.

You have to sympathize with his position.

Sympathize with him? Noooo way. As the public face and the mover behind the scenes, he willingly and knowingly sold a bad deal to everyone. He lied, he never held elaine to account for her decisions, and ultimately he totally failed to reduce capacity at MHS. I go back/forth on whether he fooled everyone or if elaine made him look like the biggest fool of all.

Sympathize with him? Not a chance - I blame him for failing to do what was right, for pushing for real change, and for blindly supporting elaine. He and elaine share blame for wasting everyones time on a boundary that did nothing when we should have focused on a renovation.

So now that Fcps is going to redo the Reno q will McLean put REAL—“do this for us or we don’t vote dem for Dranesville OR at large—pressure on the school board to get McLean the desperately needed expansion or will they fold like a cheap suit?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Boundary change was needed. McLean was told to wait on a larger conversation years ago, which led to the formation of McSpaces.

\

So elaine's boundary change, negotiated with mcspaces and vance, reduced overcrowding at MHS? The boundary change reduced capacity at MHS by how much? Did it help? If so, please provide more detail so I can understand.

DP, but the MHS enrollment this fall is at an all-time high with 2368 kids in December.

MHS has been overcrowded for a decade, and they've had plenty of time to adjust the CIP to budget for an addition to the school.

When asked what she's doing to fulfill her campaign pledge to secure funding for a permanent addition to the school (which has the least permanent learning space of any high school in FCPS, but an above-average enrollment), Elaine tells MHS that "she's only one of 12 School Board members." Seems like being a Democrat on a School Board with 12 Democratic members might position Elaine to actually advocate for one of her Dranesville schools, but the only schools in FCPS she apparently cares about are TJ and Langley.

As for McSpaces, they seem to have disappeared from the face of the earth. My understanding is the leader is a loyal Democrat unwilling to call out Tholen's failures.

vance proved himself to be a coward during the boundary process - he knew elaine was selling him a bad deal but he did not have the guts to call her out, or even ask her tough questions.

I hear he’s a staunch democrat. He probably doesn’t want to do anything that weakens the possibility of the next dem candidate for Dranesville.

Making a huge fuss about Elaine and the school board will might result in hurting the rep of Fairfax dems and give republicans ammo for the next election.

You have to sympathize with his position.

Sympathize with him? Noooo way. As the public face and the mover behind the scenes, he willingly and knowingly sold a bad deal to everyone. He lied, he never held elaine to account for her decisions, and ultimately he totally failed to reduce capacity at MHS. I go back/forth on whether he fooled everyone or if elaine made him look like the biggest fool of all.

Sympathize with him? Not a chance - I blame him for failing to do what was right, for pushing for real change, and for blindly supporting elaine. He and elaine share blame for wasting everyones time on a boundary that did nothing when we should have focused on a renovation.

So now that Fcps is going to redo the Reno q will McLean put REAL—“do this for us or we don’t vote dem for Dranesville OR at large—pressure on the school board to get McLean the desperately needed expansion or will they fold like a cheap suit?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Boundary change was needed. McLean was told to wait on a larger conversation years ago, which led to the formation of McSpaces.

\

So elaine's boundary change, negotiated with mcspaces and vance, reduced overcrowding at MHS? The boundary change reduced capacity at MHS by how much? Did it help? If so, please provide more detail so I can understand.

DP, but the MHS enrollment this fall is at an all-time high with 2368 kids in December.

MHS has been overcrowded for a decade, and they've had plenty of time to adjust the CIP to budget for an addition to the school.

When asked what she's doing to fulfill her campaign pledge to secure funding for a permanent addition to the school (which has the least permanent learning space of any high school in FCPS, but an above-average enrollment), Elaine tells MHS that "she's only one of 12 School Board members." Seems like being a Democrat on a School Board with 12 Democratic members might position Elaine to actually advocate for one of her Dranesville schools, but the only schools in FCPS she apparently cares about are TJ and Langley.

As for McSpaces, they seem to have disappeared from the face of the earth. My understanding is the leader is a loyal Democrat unwilling to call out Tholen's failures.

vance proved himself to be a coward during the boundary process - he knew elaine was selling him a bad deal but he did not have the guts to call her out, or even ask her tough questions.

I hear he’s a staunch democrat. He probably doesn’t want to do anything that weakens the possibility of the next dem candidate for Dranesville.

Making a huge fuss about Elaine and the school board will might result in hurting the rep of Fairfax dems and give republicans ammo for the next election.

You have to sympathize with his position.

Sympathize with him? Noooo way. As the public face and the mover behind the scenes, he willingly and knowingly sold a bad deal to everyone. He lied, he never held elaine to account for her decisions, and ultimately he totally failed to reduce capacity at MHS. I go back/forth on whether he fooled everyone or if elaine made him look like the biggest fool of all.

Sympathize with him? Not a chance - I blame him for failing to do what was right, for pushing for real change, and for blindly supporting elaine. He and elaine share blame for wasting everyones time on a boundary that did nothing when we should have focused on a renovation.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Cohen and Frisch don’t do anything to address overcrowded high schools, but they are constantly asking for money. Talk about “pay to play”!

https://secure.actblue.com/donate/lgbtqljckf22?fbclid=IwAR253DuT1hNjsgg4nZwT7Cy_EOvXJFCVGf-kVqWaJP4DIEShutIlMEbAmr8

The elitists make it clear that they'd rather have their kids go to overcrowded schools instead of adjusting boundaries, so Cohen and Frisch can't really push for policy to address overcrowding. Well, they can, but they'd risk their reputations.

I thought Cohen was supporting moving kids from West Springfield to under-enrolled Lewis. Is that not the case?

We aren’t sure. There was some movement of neighborhoods from (I think) Springfield District to Lee District for magisterial district purposes. Your district for the BoS doesn’t match up with your school pyramid though. It is unclear to me if Cohen understands that fact. West Springfield has pretty compact and logical boundaries and, with the expansion (that is already done and predates Cohen, so no point in arguing about it anymore) is just about at capacity.

Where is the plan for all of this? Tholen had a chance to wait on the MHS boundary until after FCPS hired the boundary consultant - that consultant was supposed to recommend best practices on boundaries for all of FCPS. Tholen did not wait and pushed through the change in the middle of a pandemic - so she failed to make the process better (or make a process at all). How is it that we now see Cohen and Frisch going about this in the same failed way Tholen did - a way that lacks transparency and leaves parents wondering where things stand?

I just hope that people are right and she won’t run again. She hasn’t kept her campaign pledges and is utterly ineffective.

If she somehow does move a few neighborhoods from WS to Lewis (which I doubt, but suppose could happen), she’ll be a pariah in Fairfax County and will have to move away. Lol. People will be so mad.

WSHS/Springfield district really like to play the victim here as if they're being singled out, but the real overcrowding issue is much larger in scope than just affecting WSHS. We obviously know the western schools need significant relief and now even some central and eastern ones like Oakton, Woodson, Mclean, Edison, (and WSHS) are projected to be at or over 100% even when accounting for using modulars and renovations by 2026. A complete county-wide study and overhaul of boundaries is inevitable, especially as the western high school is still at best 8+ years out according to Platenberg.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Boundary change was needed. McLean was told to wait on a larger conversation years ago, which led to the formation of McSpaces.

\

So elaine's boundary change, negotiated with mcspaces and vance, reduced overcrowding at MHS? The boundary change reduced capacity at MHS by how much? Did it help? If so, please provide more detail so I can understand.

DP, but the MHS enrollment this fall is at an all-time high with 2368 kids in December.

MHS has been overcrowded for a decade, and they've had plenty of time to adjust the CIP to budget for an addition to the school.

When asked what she's doing to fulfill her campaign pledge to secure funding for a permanent addition to the school (which has the least permanent learning space of any high school in FCPS, but an above-average enrollment), Elaine tells MHS that "she's only one of 12 School Board members." Seems like being a Democrat on a School Board with 12 Democratic members might position Elaine to actually advocate for one of her Dranesville schools, but the only schools in FCPS she apparently cares about are TJ and Langley.

As for McSpaces, they seem to have disappeared from the face of the earth. My understanding is the leader is a loyal Democrat unwilling to call out Tholen's failures.

vance proved himself to be a coward during the boundary process - he knew elaine was selling him a bad deal but he did not have the guts to call her out, or even ask her tough questions.

I hear he’s a staunch democrat. He probably doesn’t want to do anything that weakens the possibility of the next dem candidate for Dranesville.

Making a huge fuss about Elaine and the school board will might result in hurting the rep of Fairfax dems and give republicans ammo for the next election.

You have to sympathize with his position.

The Republicans will have plenty of ammo against any Democrat who asks for votes from McLean precincts in 2023. Along with the Langley precincts that in non-Trump years generally vote Republican there is a very good chance they'll flip both the School Board and Board of Supervisors seats in Dranesville in 2023 (the local supervisor, John Foust, has heavily promoted development in Tysons and downtown McLean, but doesn't put any pressure on the School Board to address the current and future school overcrowding).

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Boundary change was needed. McLean was told to wait on a larger conversation years ago, which led to the formation of McSpaces.

\

So elaine's boundary change, negotiated with mcspaces and vance, reduced overcrowding at MHS? The boundary change reduced capacity at MHS by how much? Did it help? If so, please provide more detail so I can understand.

DP, but the MHS enrollment this fall is at an all-time high with 2368 kids in December.

MHS has been overcrowded for a decade, and they've had plenty of time to adjust the CIP to budget for an addition to the school.

When asked what she's doing to fulfill her campaign pledge to secure funding for a permanent addition to the school (which has the least permanent learning space of any high school in FCPS, but an above-average enrollment), Elaine tells MHS that "she's only one of 12 School Board members." Seems like being a Democrat on a School Board with 12 Democratic members might position Elaine to actually advocate for one of her Dranesville schools, but the only schools in FCPS she apparently cares about are TJ and Langley.

As for McSpaces, they seem to have disappeared from the face of the earth. My understanding is the leader is a loyal Democrat unwilling to call out Tholen's failures.

vance proved himself to be a coward during the boundary process - he knew elaine was selling him a bad deal but he did not have the guts to call her out, or even ask her tough questions.

I hear he’s a staunch democrat. He probably doesn’t want to do anything that weakens the possibility of the next dem candidate for Dranesville.

Making a huge fuss about Elaine and the school board will might result in hurting the rep of Fairfax dems and give republicans ammo for the next election.

You have to sympathize with his position.