Anonymous wrote:I understand being concerned for the future of Roe v. Wade and for those in other states but Scalia, an originalist, said that abortion was a matter to be left to the states. Terrifying women who live in Blue states that they should be transferring embryos to Canada or stockpiling birth control pills puts you in the category of the hysterical. Unless you think that the governments of DC, Virginia or Maryland are likely to be a very conservative red sometime soon, outlawing IVF, contraception, or abortion are not likely around here. But ymmv.

Oh please we all know she wants to do away with Roe vs Wade that is what her job is period. Well beside pardoning Trump and giving him the election.

Two things.
1. Clearly she is not qualified today she could not answer simple questions about the constitution. Yet her white notebook was empty.
2. Her non disclosures are not mistakes. She claims she is fastidious at work well then why didn't she turn in the appropriate paperwork???

We "libs" know exactly who she is. And for a job interview lifetime appointment she isn't a good fit. And I personally would be ok with a conservative just not her! She is Typhoid Mary. If she can not stand up for her children and wear a simple mask in public ie Rose Garden then no she's not qualified! She spread the virus to her kids school. She's a great human as well. NO!

Anonymous wrote:If you have not had a chance to see this woman's testimony, it is well worth the 5 minutes.

Thank you! This was really eye-opening and I enjoyed listening to this testimony of support.

What about your daughters??

I understand being concerned for the future of Roe v. Wade and for those in other states but Scalia, an originalist, said that abortion was a matter to be left to the states. Terrifying women who live in Blue states that they should be transferring embryos to Canada or stockpiling birth control pills puts you in the category of the hysterical. Unless you think that the governments of DC, Virginia or Maryland are likely to be a very conservative red sometime soon, outlawing IVF, contraception, or abortion are not likely around here. But ymmv.

Anonymous wrote:She’ll get nominated and approved for the seat.
That’s the process and it’s being followed.

What’s the big deal?

I know, right? Rich bitches like us have been stock-piling birth control pills for months, have had our frozen fetuses transferred to Canadian labs, have started off-site Abortion/Avortement savings accounts for our little Biancas and Bryces. I mean, poor women dying? We give "F" all. Fewer "takers," or "suckers and losers" as we like to call them.

She’ll get nominated and approved for the seat.
That’s the process and it’s being followed.

What’s the big deal?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Amy is a fundie judge who is loved by other fundies. What is so surprising about this? We cannot change each others minds and I have had to cut out fundie friends. Move on guys. Packing the court to rebalance is the only way out of this fundie nonsense.

Talk about needing to broaden your vocabulary! I’m about as far from “fundie” as one can get and I support her nomination. She is a serious and thoughtful legal scholar who will be an asset to the court. But keep on embarrassing yourself! Your ignorant posts are entertaining.

I just wanted to make sure you understood, that is all!!

What does her husband do? Where on earth in the dmv are they going to be able to support a family of 9 on the associate justice salary of 250k with a semi decent commute for her? I wouldn’t even want the damn job if it meant commuting from like Woodbridge everyday.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Amy is a fundie judge who is loved by other fundies. What is so surprising about this? We cannot change each others minds and I have had to cut out fundie friends. Move on guys. Packing the court to rebalance is the only way out of this fundie nonsense.

Talk about needing to broaden your vocabulary! I’m about as far from “fundie” as one can get and I support her nomination. She is a serious and thoughtful legal scholar who will be an asset to the court. But keep on embarrassing yourself! Your ignorant posts are entertaining.

What specific "serious, thoughtful" contributions has she made to the field of law? What specific interpretations has she contributed? Please name at least three.

She has 7 children! That’s enough! And she’ll ban abortion and take sponge bob off the air because he and squidbert are gay!!!! She’ll stop the war on Christmas!!!!

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Amy is a fundie judge who is loved by other fundies. What is so surprising about this? We cannot change each others minds and I have had to cut out fundie friends. Move on guys. Packing the court to rebalance is the only way out of this fundie nonsense.

Talk about needing to broaden your vocabulary! I’m about as far from “fundie” as one can get and I support her nomination. She is a serious and thoughtful legal scholar who will be an asset to the court. But keep on embarrassing yourself! Your ignorant posts are entertaining.

What specific "serious, thoughtful" contributions has she made to the field of law? What specific interpretations has she contributed? Please name at least three.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Amy is a fundie judge who is loved by other fundies. What is so surprising about this? We cannot change each others minds and I have had to cut out fundie friends. Move on guys. Packing the court to rebalance is the only way out of this fundie nonsense.

Talk about needing to broaden your vocabulary! I’m about as far from “fundie” as one can get and I support her nomination. She is a serious and thoughtful legal scholar who will be an asset to the court. But keep on embarrassing yourself! Your ignorant posts are entertaining.

You’re a fundie or else happy to ally with fundies to reduce your taxes. I don’t know which is worse.

Both are equally awful. Betty Ford and Pat Nixon believed in abortion rights, birth control rights, and supported the ERA. The Republican Party is now a cult of crazy people or very selfish people who are happy to follow orders or go along to get along it. The selfish are equally complicit and I look forward to the Tiktok videos from the children of the selfish begging to be emancipated.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If you have not had a chance to see this woman's testimony, it is well worth the 5 minutes.

It's nice that ACB was nice to this woman. But that does not qualify her to be on the SCOTUS. It does not erase her extreme views. It does not excuse her opposition to abortion, and her refusal to say that Roe V Wade is settled (or whatever you call it in law). Or her refusal to say that Medicare is settled!! She may be a nice person to those around her, but her views will inflict untold pain and suffering upon millions of Americans.

Yes, she should be "nice" to all women and guarantee their right to bodily autonomy.

But fascist legal Barbie was nice to her! She was nice! And she has 7 children! Who needs separation of church and state, healthcare, and the environment!

Wow. No words for this.
When you resort to hyperbole and outright lies, you have no argument.

We get it. You have literally crushed three separate strands of pearls between your angrily clenched fist in the span of several weeks. I mean, what upstanding citizen should be faced with such trouble from heathenous liberals nervous about the implication of her nomination? It’s not like it’s completely evident acb was groomed by a cult that tells women to be subservient to their husbands, and who lived at a cult leaders house in college, was hand picked by the federalist society and only has three years experience as a judge, gave speeches against abortion, and didn’t divulge other zealous speeches she’s made on her calendar, all while noting she thinks being Gay is a “sexual preference” and that she has no firm views on climate change. I mean we’re all so uncouth and rude. It’s the future of the country and we should show the utmost deterrence to this wide eyed woman of virtue, who will not a mainstream pick at all, will ensure that fascism still has a place on the court.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I can’t imagine any job she would deserve from this interview. It’s one thing to say that there are things she can’t comment on, but she hasn’t shown enough knowledge of the law to be hired as an associate or a law clerk.

Right, right... it’s not as if she’s talked for hours and hours each day about the intricacies and minutiae of her decisions, writings, and the Constitution - completely from memory. No, she’s definitely not an extremely skilled academic and judge. Nope, not her!

Your desperation is so obvious. And pathetic.

I am an educator, and the Constitution is written at an elementary school level. If a 5th grader can understand it, a lawyer must be able to do so.

You’re saying this brilliant judge and academic - who teaches Constitutional Law - doesn’t understand the Constitution?

I am saying it's so easy to understand, you don't need a law degree to read and interpret it.

Well, by that logic, we had a bunch of Democrats asking a bunch of stupid questions that had nothing to do with that document, should never be answered when observing the way these hearings are intended to operate, and otherwise talking directly at the cameras for CNN. I guess none of them are capable of reading the Constitution since it is so easy to understand. Shameful! LOL

+1
The display of stupidity that the Democrats have put on over the past three days was cringeworthy. I enjoyed seeing ACB keep her cool throughout.

If you want to talk about stupid, i would refer you to all the Republicans comments on her children. Sexist and irrelevant.

PP here. I agree, there was too much mention of her children. However, it is pretty remarkable that she’s been able to be so successful at her career while raising seven children. And that’s a fact. Male nominees are also asked about their children.

No, they are not. Not in the same way. Nobody asked Biff Kavanaugh who does the laundry for example. The implicit sexism in that statement is that who is doing the "women's work" in her house. It was disgusting.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If you have not had a chance to see this woman's testimony, it is well worth the 5 minutes.

It's nice that ACB was nice to this woman. But that does not qualify her to be on the SCOTUS. It does not erase her extreme views. It does not excuse her opposition to abortion, and her refusal to say that Roe V Wade is settled (or whatever you call it in law). Or her refusal to say that Medicare is settled!! She may be a nice person to those around her, but her views will inflict untold pain and suffering upon millions of Americans.

Yes, she should be "nice" to all women and guarantee their right to bodily autonomy.

But fascist legal Barbie was nice to her! She was nice! And she has 7 children! Who needs separation of church and state, healthcare, and the environment!

Wow. No words for this.
When you resort to hyperbole and outright lies, you have no argument.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Amy is a fundie judge who is loved by other fundies. What is so surprising about this? We cannot change each others minds and I have had to cut out fundie friends. Move on guys. Packing the court to rebalance is the only way out of this fundie nonsense.

Talk about needing to broaden your vocabulary! I’m about as far from “fundie” as one can get and I support her nomination. She is a serious and thoughtful legal scholar who will be an asset to the court. But keep on embarrassing yourself! Your ignorant posts are entertaining.

You’re a fundie or else happy to ally with fundies to reduce your taxes. I don’t know which is worse.