Still waiting for someone to tell me, in one sentence, what happened that the problem here? Facts please. Not allegations.

Margot Cleveland, LOL She's such a good lawyer that she still claims to be a professor at Notre Dame, even though she was only ever an adjunct.

Hope they're not still paying her in rubles.

Anonymous wrote:

This! Durham is a Trump doormat.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:LOL @ Vanity Fair... Meanwhile this organization stays in their lane, unlike the Hollywood gossip rag.

and

Lol at trusting The Federalist. No wonder you right wingers are so snowed.

+100. Federalist is a right wing propaganda rag.

Agreed that "Hollywood gossip rag" does more way more honest reporting than the biased RWNJ Federalist trashheap.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:LOL @ Vanity Fair... Meanwhile this organization stays in their lane, unlike the Hollywood gossip rag.

and

Lol at trusting The Federalist. No wonder you right wingers are so snowed.

+100. Federalist is a right wing propaganda rag.

Anonymous wrote:LOL @ Vanity Fair... Meanwhile this organization stays in their lane, unlike the Hollywood gossip rag.

and

Lol at trusting The Federalist. No wonder you right wingers are so snowed.

Anonymous wrote:LOL @ Vanity Fair... Meanwhile this organization stays in their lane, unlike the Hollywood gossip rag.

and

You left off the /s

Since people post the craziest things, it's important to include this otherwise we'll think you are serious.

LOL @ Vanity Fair... Meanwhile this organization stays in their lane, unlike the Hollywood gossip rag.

and

This is a decent summary

https://www.vanityfair.com/news/2022/02/donald-trump-hillary-clinton-white-house-spying

Durham is basically a January 6er.

Let’s put them all in prison.

Anonymous wrote:Oh lord I just went over to fox.com
It’s crazy over there.
Durham should be sanctioned for this.

Yep and I hope Sussman, Clinton and others set up legal funds to go after FOX and all the rest of the right wing news outlets that are grossly misrepresenting and outright lying about Durham's investigation.

Oh lord I just went over to fox.com
It’s crazy over there.
Durham should be sanctioned for this.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:NP... I think this filing was nothing but partisan political theater intended to falsely enrage the right wing. Durham should be fired for this stunt.

It's hard to see this as anything else.

This is supposed to be a criminal case, remember. This posturing, this belated inquiry about a "potential conflict of interest", is bizarre. Or would be, in a normal criminal trial.

It's astounding how the right wing media lies and misrepresentations have been flying. Durham's filing doesn't establish anything done "on behalf of the Clinton campaign" nor does it say Joffe did anything illegal. DNS is not "infiltration" or "gathering derogatory information" and the EOP period in question was before Trump even took office. Durham's filing is incredibly sloppy, and probably by design. It's definitely posturing.

Anonymous wrote:When does a judge weigh in?

Whenever he wants to.

He could ignore all this, or make a ruling on it quickly or slowly. But judges don't really like their courts being used for political or non-judicial purposes. They don't take kindly to that.