Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Trump appears to be “Doe 174.”

“An exhaustive review of the documents by Business Insider points to one no-longer-anonymous Doe who checks all the boxes: Doe 174.

Preska's list identifies Doe 174 as a person whose "association with Epstein and Maxwell has been widely reported in the media already, and his or her name came up during Maxwell's public criminal trial."

[…]

But in her ruling, Preska said Doe 174's name came up in nine different documents that were previously under seal or had their name redacted.

As of publication time Monday night, three of those documents had not yet been completely unredacted. But Trump does fit into the context of those documents.

The other six documents that had been unsealed all include Trump's name, and no other Doe is listed as being named in those same docket entries.”

It appears that Trump is quite a bit more involved in this than his fan club would like us to believe.

And for the obsessed loons: “ In her December order to unseal the names, Preska said some Does didn't argue to keep their identities secret. For Doe 36, who's Bill Clinton, for example, Preska wrote that he didn't object to having his name unsealed.” https://www.businessinsider.com/donald-trump-doe-jeffrey-epstein-documents-unsealed-2024-1

Yep, if you have nothing or very little to hide, it's best to come right out with it: which is what Bill Clinton did. If he is involved, he should pay the price. At least he is capable of learning.

All the Trump fans don't even want to admit their boy is involved in this and doing his usual coverup.

Anonymous wrote:I deplore Trump but honestly, you can't call him out and not B Clinton. That guy is 1000% every bit the same from this perspective. Whether he excelled in politics or not, as a man, he was definitely disgusting. To not admit that is to be in denial - this is B Clinton who is an established womanizer. Regardless of whether you thought he was an effective President, the guy was not shy about doing whatever he wanted to any woman - he is every bit as sleezy on this level as Trump.

How sleezy a person Trump is v others is a different matter. On the subject of women, a lot of men are every bit the monster he is, regardless of how else they are.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Trump appears to be “Doe 174.”

“An exhaustive review of the documents by Business Insider points to one no-longer-anonymous Doe who checks all the boxes: Doe 174.

Preska's list identifies Doe 174 as a person whose "association with Epstein and Maxwell has been widely reported in the media already, and his or her name came up during Maxwell's public criminal trial."

[…]

But in her ruling, Preska said Doe 174's name came up in nine different documents that were previously under seal or had their name redacted.

As of publication time Monday night, three of those documents had not yet been completely unredacted. But Trump does fit into the context of those documents.

The other six documents that had been unsealed all include Trump's name, and no other Doe is listed as being named in those same docket entries.”

It appears that Trump is quite a bit more involved in this than his fan club would like us to believe.

And for the obsessed loons: “ In her December order to unseal the names, Preska said some Does didn't argue to keep their identities secret. For Doe 36, who's Bill Clinton, for example, Preska wrote that he didn't object to having his name unsealed.” https://www.businessinsider.com/donald-trump-doe-jeffrey-epstein-documents-unsealed-2024-1

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I deplore Trump but honestly, you can't call him out and not B Clinton. That guy is 1000% every bit the same from this perspective. Whether he excelled in politics or not, as a man, he was definitely disgusting. To not admit that is to be in denial - this is B Clinton who is an established womanizer. Regardless of whether you thought he was an effective President, the guy was not shy about doing whatever he wanted to any woman - he is every bit as sleezy on this level as Trump.

How sleezy a person Trump is v others is a different matter. On the subject of women, a lot of men are every bit the monster he is, regardless of how else they are.

Oh, I can. I mean go ahead and call Trump out and not Clinton because Trump is an actual rapist and a dozen different direct quotes from Trump’s own mouth have been put in or linked from this thread. Furthermore, Clinton didn’t fight having his name revealed; Trump is still only potentially Doe 174. Once again these are completely unequal things.

Anonymous wrote:Was Epstein working for Israeli government?

Anonymous wrote:I deplore Trump but honestly, you can't call him out and not B Clinton. That guy is 1000% every bit the same from this perspective. Whether he excelled in politics or not, as a man, he was definitely disgusting. To not admit that is to be in denial - this is B Clinton who is an established womanizer. Regardless of whether you thought he was an effective President, the guy was not shy about doing whatever he wanted to any woman - he is every bit as sleezy on this level as Trump.

How sleezy a person Trump is v others is a different matter. On the subject of women, a lot of men are every bit the monster he is, regardless of how else they are.

Anonymous wrote:Trump appears to be “Doe 174.”

“An exhaustive review of the documents by Business Insider points to one no-longer-anonymous Doe who checks all the boxes: Doe 174.

Preska's list identifies Doe 174 as a person whose "association with Epstein and Maxwell has been widely reported in the media already, and his or her name came up during Maxwell's public criminal trial."

[…]

But in her ruling, Preska said Doe 174's name came up in nine different documents that were previously under seal or had their name redacted.

As of publication time Monday night, three of those documents had not yet been completely unredacted. But Trump does fit into the context of those documents.

The other six documents that had been unsealed all include Trump's name, and no other Doe is listed as being named in those same docket entries.”

It appears that Trump is quite a bit more involved in this than his fan club would like us to believe.

And for the obsessed loons: “ In her December order to unseal the names, Preska said some Does didn't argue to keep their identities secret. For Doe 36, who's Bill Clinton, for example, Preska wrote that he didn't object to having his name unsealed.” https://www.businessinsider.com/donald-trump-doe-jeffrey-epstein-documents-unsealed-2024-1

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Bill Clinton was mentioned by another witness as hearing 'Clinton didn't take the bait.'

Not surprised. Unlike Trump, he doesn’t seem to have a taste for children.

Hmmm.... "He likes them young." A direct quote from the testimony.

Monica-Lewinski young. Not trafficked-teenager young.

I’m guessing embarrassing for Hillary Clinton to see nevertheless

Anonymous wrote:Epstein famously had a painting hung in his office. The painting depicts President Clinton, wearing a blue dress.

Here is the backstory, from the artist who painted the artwork:

https://news.artnet.com/art-world-archives/artist-epstein-clinton-painting-1628953

Anonymous wrote:This is quite a different take than Trump has.