Amid all this mediocrity comes Pearson, the company that makes millions on standardized testing contracts in Florida ($254 million), New York ($32 million), and Texas ($468 million), among many others. This month Pearson executives met with Barack Obama and Duncan at the White House to discuss ways to help low-income students get into college. I'll match every dollar Pearson makes if you don't think the solution that Pearson proposed was more testing.
You (or somebody) keep saying that. But as a statement just out there, all by itself, it's about as meaningful as "Martin Luther King Jr. was a subspecies of avocado."
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
What is the testing requirement in the Common Core?
There is none.
However, the money from the federal government is tied to testing. Follow the money.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
What is the testing requirement in the Common Core?
There is none.
However, the money from the federal government is tied to testing. Follow the money.
Anonymous wrote:
What is the testing requirement in the Common Core?
There is none.
Anonymous wrote:The Department of Education has now made this into a federal issue. Common Core is too big. Take out the testing requirement and let the states run it as they wish.
Anonymous wrote:What is the testing requirement in the Common Core?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:http://www.washingtonpost.com/local/education/pearson-pays-77-million-in-common-core-settlement/2013/12/13/77515bba-6423-11e3-aa81-e1dab1360323_story.html
One more time: follow the money
Ok so the Pearson company had to give the money back. Now where is it? I'm sooo confused.
They didn't give money back. They paid a fine for violating the law by passing money from their non-profit to their profit. In other words, they are crooked.
Anonymous wrote:http://www.huffingtonpost.com/jason-stanford/arne-duncan-pearson-testing_b_4648554.html
You Common Core supporters don't understand that this is part of the problem?
Anonymous wrote:You're right. The Defense Department contracts involve a lot more money.
And, is a lot more necessary than Common Core standards.
You're right. The Defense Department contracts involve a lot more money.
Anonymous wrote:Do you also think we should get rid of the Department of Defense?
No. However, it is far from the same thing.
Anonymous wrote:http://www.huffingtonpost.com/jason-stanford/arne-duncan-pearson-testing_b_4648554.html
You Common Core supporters don't understand that this is part of the problem?