Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Vance is very smooth. Like a salesman. And he's less nervous and more wily.
But I still don't find him likeable. He's like a well oiled lawyer.
He barely answered the question on whether Israel should fire a preemptive strike on Iran. Instead, he ran out the clock thanking the sponsors and telling his long personal bio. He ended by saying for a few seconds at the end that Israel should do what they think is right. He had zero clue how to answer, and no substance to his answer. He's just a shiny suit.
Yes he did. He said that is Israel's decision.
He did. He followed it up with the US should back any decision Israel makes. WTF. That I do not agree. We should not be forever paying for their decisions, good or bad.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Why does Walz looks so angry?
If you had to pretend you loved Donald Trump wouldn't you be angry, too?
No. But Walz has deep wrinkles of angry man, he is not angry because of today's debate, he has been angry for years.
Life gives people the face they deserve.
. I do agree with Vance but that’s of no never mind. He answered the questionAnonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Vance is very smooth. Like a salesman. And he's less nervous and more wily.
But I still don't find him likeable. He's like a well oiled lawyer.
He barely answered the question on whether Israel should fire a preemptive strike on Iran. Instead, he ran out the clock thanking the sponsors and telling his long personal bio. He ended by saying for a few seconds at the end that Israel should do what they think is right. He had zero clue how to answer, and no substance to his answer. He's just a shiny suit.
Yes he did. He said that is Israel's decision.
He did. He followed it up with the US should back any decision Israel makes. WTF. That I do not agree. We should not be forever paying for their decisions, good or bad.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Day 1 was 1400 days ago!
Bam.
Why has Harris not working o this right now!!!
Somebody flunked their high school civics class. Go back and study what powers are enumerated in a Vice President versus President and then you’d know how stupid you really are when making this allegation.
Let me clean that up.
The problems we have had in the last 3.5 years fall directly on Biden/Harris. They have similar policies.
Even so, Biden has exited the stage and handed over most responsibilities to Harris. She is sitting in on calls with world leaders, leading relief efforts for Helene, and he is letting her do whatever she wants now with his support.
So if these problems are so urgent, why is not fixing them NOW vs waiting for January 2025?
Trump torpedo'd the immigration bill that should have passed in March. If immigration is so important, why didn't the GOP pass the bill?
Simple!!!!!
That bill still allowed up to 5000 illegals to cross daily. Was weak on border security and enforcement!
That bill was written up in 2024.
In 2023, HR2 was passed by the Republican House and was never taken up by the Democrat Cornell’s
Senate.
It was better in every way possible. Limits on asylum claims, made migrants wait at posts of entry, limited false asylum claims, more agents and border wall.
So. Senate bill was worse than HR2.
Democrats sank that bill in 2023!!!!!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:wow. Vance is good.
+1
Things I can’t believe Walz said: he’s a knucklehead, he has bad grammar, he’s friends with school shooters, and the whole panic ramble about Tiananmen square. He had wild eyes and a very uncomfortable vibe about him.
DP. So was Walz at Tiananmen Square? I'm confused by his answer.
No, he went to China about a month or two after the actual Tianamen Square massacre. But my memory (I'm about his age) is that the protest movement and the ensuing crackdown was larger than just that one day. So he may have been remembering the general vibe and not the specific day. Or he may have meant to say he was there "in the wake of" Tianemen Square and short-handed that. It was a dumb unforced error on his part, but I don't think it was a malicious lie.
Meanwhile, Trump and Vance spread malicious lies about 40 times a day, but that's okay. Let's focus on one time Tim Walz mis-spoke about his trips to China. Good Lord. The GOP is so desperate.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Vance is very smooth. Like a salesman. And he's less nervous and more wily.
But I still don't find him likeable. He's like a well oiled lawyer.
He barely answered the question on whether Israel should fire a preemptive strike on Iran. Instead, he ran out the clock thanking the sponsors and telling his long personal bio. He ended by saying for a few seconds at the end that Israel should do what they think is right. He had zero clue how to answer, and no substance to his answer. He's just a shiny suit.
Yes he did. He said that is Israel's decision.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:wow. Vance is good.
+1
Things I can’t believe Walz said: he’s a knucklehead, he has bad grammar, he’s friends with school shooters, and the whole panic ramble about Tiananmen square. He had wild eyes and a very uncomfortable vibe about him.
DP. So was Walz at Tiananmen Square? I'm confused by his answer.
He lied about it numerous times. Most recently he said in a CBS interview he was there.
But he was Not! He came to China a few months later.
This poses a problem with his issues with whole military service snafu as well.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Day 1 was 1400 days ago!
Bam.
Why has Harris not working o this right now!!!
Somebody flunked their high school civics class. Go back and study what powers are enumerated in a Vice President versus President and then you’d know how stupid you really are when making this allegation.
Let me clean that up.
The problems we have had in the last 3.5 years fall directly on Biden/Harris. They have similar policies.
Even so, Biden has exited the stage and handed over most responsibilities to Harris. She is sitting in on calls with world leaders, leading relief efforts for Helene, and he is letting her do whatever she wants now with his support.
So if these problems are so urgent, why is not fixing them NOW vs waiting for January 2025?
Trump torpedo'd the immigration bill that should have passed in March. If immigration is so important, why didn't the GOP pass the bill?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Day 1 was 1400 days ago!
Bam.
Why has Harris not working o this right now!!!
Somebody flunked their high school civics class. Go back and study what powers are enumerated in a Vice President versus President and then you’d know how stupid you really are when making this allegation.
Let me clean that up.
The problems we have had in the last 3.5 years fall directly on Biden/Harris. They have similar policies.
Even so, Biden has exited the stage and handed over most responsibilities to Harris. She is sitting in on calls with world leaders, leading relief efforts for Helene, and he is letting her do whatever she wants now with his support.
So if these problems are so urgent, why is not fixing them NOW vs waiting for January 2025?
Trump torpedo'd the immigration bill that should have passed in March. If immigration is so important, why didn't the GOP pass the bill?