Anonymous wrote:Maybe this has been covered, but how on earth are there no martial assets?
They’ve been together 20 years! That’s crazy. She should have insisted her name be on the deed to their shared home.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Seems like she could just not take him anymore and given how she is being treated you can understand why.
+1 this
She was very young and pretty and in love with him. At that stage of the relationship, she probably didn't realize how controlling and determined he is. There doesn't appear to have been an affair with someone else on her part; and they were married for 20 years with 3 kids, so I can't imagine why he's treating her this way.
Her rental home isn't inexpensive, but there's nothing exceptional about it by DCUM standards or for the ex-wife of a guy worth $400 million.
She was almost 30. Not “very young.”
PP here. It's "very young" to me, plus there was an 18 year difference between them. Regardless of what she should have or didn't do, Kevin Costner's true ungenerous self is being observed by the world.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Seems like she could just not take him anymore and given how she is being treated you can understand why.
+1 this
She was very young and pretty and in love with him. At that stage of the relationship, she probably didn't realize how controlling and determined he is. There doesn't appear to have been an affair with someone else on her part; and they were married for 20 years with 3 kids, so I can't imagine why he's treating her this way.
Her rental home isn't inexpensive, but there's nothing exceptional about it by DCUM standards or for the ex-wife of a guy worth $400 million.
She was almost 30. Not “very young.”
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It’s weird she’s crying poor after almost 20 years of marriage. She should have figured out some way to generate her own income stream. Every celeb wife out there today is a hawking something or the other. Even the average RHOA probably has a higher net worth. It’s not like Hollywood has a reputation of marriages lasting forever.
Not everyone is that tacky.
But they’re not broke.
A lot of behavior and acceptance of certain behaviors depend on your background.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Seems like she could just not take him anymore and given how she is being treated you can understand why.
+1 this
She was very young and pretty and in love with him. At that stage of the relationship, she probably didn't realize how controlling and determined he is. There doesn't appear to have been an affair with someone else on her part; and they were married for 20 years with 3 kids, so I can't imagine why he's treating her this way.
Her rental home isn't inexpensive, but there's nothing exceptional about it by DCUM standards or for the ex-wife of a guy worth $400 million.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It’s weird she’s crying poor after almost 20 years of marriage. She should have figured out some way to generate her own income stream. Every celeb wife out there today is a hawking something or the other. Even the average RHOA probably has a higher net worth. It’s not like Hollywood has a reputation of marriages lasting forever.
Not everyone is that tacky.
But they’re not broke.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It’s weird she’s crying poor after almost 20 years of marriage. She should have figured out some way to generate her own income stream. Every celeb wife out there today is a hawking something or the other. Even the average RHOA probably has a higher net worth. It’s not like Hollywood has a reputation of marriages lasting forever.
Not everyone is that tacky.
Anonymous wrote:It’s weird she’s crying poor after almost 20 years of marriage. She should have figured out some way to generate her own income stream. Every celeb wife out there today is a hawking something or the other. Even the average RHOA probably has a higher net worth. It’s not like Hollywood has a reputation of marriages lasting forever.
So the man gets to steal 20 years of her youth and vitality.
She lives a nice life, but doesn’t have the benefit of building a career during that time.
Now she’s in menopause he is over her, and she should deal with what she can afford now that she’s been out of the workforce and not building a retirement for 2 decades.
Do I have that right?
Anonymous wrote:So the man gets to steal 20 years of her youth and vitality.
She lives a nice life, but doesn’t have the benefit of building a career during that time.
Now she’s in menopause he is over her, and she should deal with what she can afford now that she’s been out of the workforce and not building a retirement for 2 decades.
Do I have that right?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:So the man gets to steal 20 years of her youth and vitality.
She lives a nice life, but doesn’t have the benefit of building a career during that time.
Now she’s in menopause he is over her, and she should deal with what she can afford now that she’s been out of the workforce and not building a retirement for 2 decades.
Do I have that right?
How is he over her???
She filed for divorce.
He didn’t renew Yellowstone because she complained about him never being home, then she divorces him.
No one forced her to sign the prenup and she’s been gallivanting with a friend of his in Maui but he is the one over her?