Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Daily Mail may be a tabloid but it’s messy AF and I love it!
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-14721283/unreported-truth-picture-Taylor-Swift-Travis-Kelce-Blake-Lively-MAUREEN-CALLAHAN.html
Blake Lively has never seemed particularly bright. But her alleged attempt to blackmail Taylor Swift by threatening to leak private texts will be the end of her — socially, professionally and reputationally.
Jenny slate was valedictorian of her hyper competetive Boston prep school and went to “real Columbia” (not general studies) for undergrad.
The allegedly intelligence and business savvy of these Hollywood bozos is always fake. Blake and Ryan are both uneducated morons; Blake especially so.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Just to review: the NYT is trash, not to be trusted. But Perez Hilton and the Daily Mail are infallible.
Go JB! xoxo
Well let’s take inventory. The NYT ran the Baldoni hit piece with the sham subpoena as cover. The Daily Mail did actual investigative journalism exposing the sham subpoena. The NYT still hasn’t reported on the sham subpoena and probably won’t. The Daily Fail may be a tabloid, but even a broke clock is right twice a day.
And to prove how fake this was from the get-go and how it's standard operating procedure at The Times, that hack Megan Twohey is not only not fired, she'll be promoted and/or rewarded with a windfall from Hollywood for being a good foot soldier.
It's also worth noting Twohey is from Washington and is a GU alum. It's not out of the question she is on her personally spinning.
No. She will be mocked and judged by other NYT reporters for messing this stupid non-story up and being blinded into thinking she’s a celebrity insider and friends/confidants with the Blakes of the world.
Totally agree with you. The pp is being nuts. The journalist will be disgraced. I feel bad for her. She was duped
Disgraced? Y'all are naive as hell. Is Jake Tapper disgraced running point for senile Biden? He’s still paid millions a year, still an CNN star, and was just given a multi-million book deal detailing he knew all along Biden was losing his mind (in contrast to his actual coverage on CNN!).
Twohey has not and will not be fired. She will become a multi-millionaire, if she isn’t already, off a career peddling bullshit.
We're talking about professional reputation among people who know about these things, not about money/fame. No real journalist (or readers of serious journalism) think Jake Tapper is anything other than an entertainer, or that CNN is much more than dismaying fear-hype-drama. The NYT reporter may well continue to have wealth and fame but this is a major hit to her prior credibility as a Serious Reporter and that is something totally different. IYKYK.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Just to review: the NYT is trash, not to be trusted. But Perez Hilton and the Daily Mail are infallible.
Go JB! xoxo
Well let’s take inventory. The NYT ran the Baldoni hit piece with the sham subpoena as cover. The Daily Mail did actual investigative journalism exposing the sham subpoena. The NYT still hasn’t reported on the sham subpoena and probably won’t. The Daily Fail may be a tabloid, but even a broke clock is right twice a day.
And to prove how fake this was from the get-go and how it's standard operating procedure at The Times, that hack Megan Twohey is not only not fired, she'll be promoted and/or rewarded with a windfall from Hollywood for being a good foot soldier.
It's also worth noting Twohey is from Washington and is a GU alum. It's not out of the question she is on her personally spinning.
Omg. You so, so, so want to believe you are on here interacting with celebrities and important journalists and not just housewives and moms. You’re so adamant that there aren’t bots or seeded stories against Lively, but one of you thought Lively herself was posting in here, and now Twohey. 👌
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Just to review: the NYT is trash, not to be trusted. But Perez Hilton and the Daily Mail are infallible.
Go JB! xoxo
Well let’s take inventory. The NYT ran the Baldoni hit piece with the sham subpoena as cover. The Daily Mail did actual investigative journalism exposing the sham subpoena. The NYT still hasn’t reported on the sham subpoena and probably won’t. The Daily Fail may be a tabloid, but even a broke clock is right twice a day.
And to prove how fake this was from the get-go and how it's standard operating procedure at The Times, that hack Megan Twohey is not only not fired, she'll be promoted and/or rewarded with a windfall from Hollywood for being a good foot soldier.
It's also worth noting Twohey is from Washington and is a GU alum. It's not out of the question she is on her personally spinning.
No. She will be mocked and judged by other NYT reporters for messing this stupid non-story up and being blinded into thinking she’s a celebrity insider and friends/confidants with the Blakes of the world.
Totally agree with you. The pp is being nuts. The journalist will be disgraced. I feel bad for her. She was duped
Disgraced? Y'all are naive as hell. Is Jake Tapper disgraced running point for senile Biden? He’s still paid millions a year, still an CNN star, and was just given a multi-million book deal detailing he knew all along Biden was losing his mind (in contrast to his actual coverage on CNN!).
Twohey has not and will not be fired. She will become a multi-millionaire, if she isn’t already, off a career peddling bullshit.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Just to review: the NYT is trash, not to be trusted. But Perez Hilton and the Daily Mail are infallible.
Go JB! xoxo
Well let’s take inventory. The NYT ran the Baldoni hit piece with the sham subpoena as cover. The Daily Mail did actual investigative journalism exposing the sham subpoena. The NYT still hasn’t reported on the sham subpoena and probably won’t. The Daily Fail may be a tabloid, but even a broke clock is right twice a day.
And to prove how fake this was from the get-go and how it's standard operating procedure at The Times, that hack Megan Twohey is not only not fired, she'll be promoted and/or rewarded with a windfall from Hollywood for being a good foot soldier.
It's also worth noting Twohey is from Washington and is a GU alum. It's not out of the question she is on her personally spinning.
No. She will be mocked and judged by other NYT reporters for messing this stupid non-story up and being blinded into thinking she’s a celebrity insider and friends/confidants with the Blakes of the world.
Totally agree with you. The pp is being nuts. The journalist will be disgraced. I feel bad for her. She was duped
Disgraced? Y'all are naive as hell. Is Jake Tapper disgraced running point for senile Biden? He’s still paid millions a year, still an CNN star, and was just given a multi-million book deal detailing he knew all along Biden was losing his mind (in contrast to his actual coverage on CNN!).
Twohey has not and will not be fired. She will become a multi-millionaire, if she isn’t already, off a career peddling bullshit.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Just to review: the NYT is trash, not to be trusted. But Perez Hilton and the Daily Mail are infallible.
Go JB! xoxo
Well let’s take inventory. The NYT ran the Baldoni hit piece with the sham subpoena as cover. The Daily Mail did actual investigative journalism exposing the sham subpoena. The NYT still hasn’t reported on the sham subpoena and probably won’t. The Daily Fail may be a tabloid, but even a broke clock is right twice a day.
And to prove how fake this was from the get-go and how it's standard operating procedure at The Times, that hack Megan Twohey is not only not fired, she'll be promoted and/or rewarded with a windfall from Hollywood for being a good foot soldier.
It's also worth noting Twohey is from Washington and is a GU alum. It's not out of the question she is on her personally spinning.
No. She will be mocked and judged by other NYT reporters for messing this stupid non-story up and being blinded into thinking she’s a celebrity insider and friends/confidants with the Blakes of the world.
Totally agree with you. The pp is being nuts. The journalist will be disgraced. I feel bad for her. She was duped
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Just to review: the NYT is trash, not to be trusted. But Perez Hilton and the Daily Mail are infallible.
Go JB! xoxo
Well let’s take inventory. The NYT ran the Baldoni hit piece with the sham subpoena as cover. The Daily Mail did actual investigative journalism exposing the sham subpoena. The NYT still hasn’t reported on the sham subpoena and probably won’t. The Daily Fail may be a tabloid, but even a broke clock is right twice a day.
And to prove how fake this was from the get-go and how it's standard operating procedure at The Times, that hack Megan Twohey is not only not fired, she'll be promoted and/or rewarded with a windfall from Hollywood for being a good foot soldier.
It's also worth noting Twohey is from Washington and is a GU alum. It's not out of the question she is on her personally spinning.
No. She will be mocked and judged by other NYT reporters for messing this stupid non-story up and being blinded into thinking she’s a celebrity insider and friends/confidants with the Blakes of the world.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Just to try to keep the 3 pro-Baldoni people posting their bs religiously here tethered to reality, I typed “Baldoni” into Bluesky and got dozens of posts from apparent Swifties saying they hated his schick, noting his ties to scooter Braun, and saying how weird it was that his PR reps kept blaming Lively for “dragging” Swift into this when he was really the one dragging her into it. I don’t post about Baldoni on Bluesky or like posts about the case etc so there is no algorithm giving me pro-Lively content. These are just the things people anre saying about him, and they’re not good.
Are you the same wackjob who became unhinged because you noticed someone copied and pasted a random post from reddit into DCUM? If yes, not only are stalking DCUM all day, and various sub-reddits all day, and Bluesky (whatever that is?), and presumably other forums and social media?
And please don't pretend you casually noticed a random post made on reddit also made here. Only a person reading EVERYTHING all day is going to notice such a thing.
Do you not realize how insane this is? This is not healthy.
I can only speak for myself, I only casually read this thread. That's it. I check in maybe once every 10 to 20 pages.
Anonymous wrote:Daily Mail may be a tabloid but it’s messy AF and I love it!
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-14721283/unreported-truth-picture-Taylor-Swift-Travis-Kelce-Blake-Lively-MAUREEN-CALLAHAN.html
Blake Lively has never seemed particularly bright. But her alleged attempt to blackmail Taylor Swift by threatening to leak private texts will be the end of her — socially, professionally and reputationally.
Anonymous wrote:Daily Mail may be a tabloid but it’s messy AF and I love it!
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-14721283/unreported-truth-picture-Taylor-Swift-Travis-Kelce-Blake-Lively-MAUREEN-CALLAHAN.html
Blake Lively has never seemed particularly bright. But her alleged attempt to blackmail Taylor Swift by threatening to leak private texts will be the end of her — socially, professionally and reputationally.
Anonymous wrote:Daily Mail may be a tabloid but it’s messy AF and I love it!
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-14721283/unreported-truth-picture-Taylor-Swift-Travis-Kelce-Blake-Lively-MAUREEN-CALLAHAN.html
Blake Lively has never seemed particularly bright. But her alleged attempt to blackmail Taylor Swift by threatening to leak private texts will be the end of her — socially, professionally and reputationally.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Just to review: the NYT is trash, not to be trusted. But Perez Hilton and the Daily Mail are infallible.
Go JB! xoxo
Well let’s take inventory. The NYT ran the Baldoni hit piece with the sham subpoena as cover. The Daily Mail did actual investigative journalism exposing the sham subpoena. The NYT still hasn’t reported on the sham subpoena and probably won’t. The Daily Fail may be a tabloid, but even a broke clock is right twice a day.
And to prove how fake this was from the get-go and how it's standard operating procedure at The Times, that hack Megan Twohey is not only not fired, she'll be promoted and/or rewarded with a windfall from Hollywood for being a good foot soldier.
It's also worth noting Twohey is from Washington and is a GU alum. It's not out of the question she is on her personally spinning.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Just to review: the NYT is trash, not to be trusted. But Perez Hilton and the Daily Mail are infallible.
Go JB! xoxo
Well let’s take inventory. The NYT ran the Baldoni hit piece with the sham subpoena as cover. The Daily Mail did actual investigative journalism exposing the sham subpoena. The NYT still hasn’t reported on the sham subpoena and probably won’t. The Daily Fail may be a tabloid, but even a broke clock is right twice a day.
And to prove how fake this was from the get-go and how it's standard operating procedure at The Times, that hack Megan Twohey is not only not fired, she'll be promoted and/or rewarded with a windfall from Hollywood for being a good foot soldier.
It's also worth noting Twohey is from Washington and is a GU alum. It's not out of the question she is on her personally spinning.