Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The more you liberals keep up with your defamation of Kavanaugh - who did NOTHING wrong, the more we are reminded that another seat may open in the coming years.
The more you give us another reason to be sure to get out and vote.
So, keep it up.

We have already seen that GOP thinks pussy grabbing, sexual assault of minors, sexual assault of adults and also election fraud and treason are nothing.
Of course you think Kavanaugh did nothing.

Because you have actual evidence of him doing something wrong - correct? Oh, wait...

This just makes you sound ignorant.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:He should never have been confirmed. He failed the job interview! It's ridiculous to believe half of what he said under oath. If you want to then how about his performance in the interview process? No other job would have hired him. Was he under pressure sure, so are others in interviews. No way he should have gotten the job the way the talked to the people interviewing him. Lifetime appointment? UGH... Bringing his ten year old into the discussion, shame on him! There had to be another candidate.....

Those who refer to his grilling about alleged decades old accusations, by Democratic senators, on live TV, broadcast to millions, as a “job interview,” have zero credibility. That was no job interview and every time you insist otherwise, you just look more idiotic.

So you’re saying he already had the job, no need to actually go through the motions? Or do you just not understand what a metaphor is?

Calling the confirmation hearings, especially the last one in which he had to defend himself against FALSE allegations, merely “job interviews” is a pathetic attempt to try and diminish what he was facing. And you know it.

Ha. His defense of himself was to be completely unable to answer questions put forth to him. He lied his ass off. The republican senators took the opportunity to get on a soapbox and asked him nothing of substance. He lost it on the stand and showed that he shouldn't even be a JUDGE, let alone a supreme court justice.

And you keep saying "FALSE" allegations, I don't think you know what the word FALSE means. He behaved appallingly toward any female senator who questioned him. He showed the US exactly what he is, and that is unfit.

He behaved exactly as I would expect anyone to behave, given unfounded allegations and ridiculous “evidence” taken straight out of his high school yearbook. The entire procedure was an experiment in the absurd and a complete embarrassment to the Democratic senators who engineered the circus. Luckily, their stupidity backfired on them and the entire nation was witness to their complete lunacy. It will never be forgotten.

The only thing you are right about is that it will never be forgotten. A huge number of women were elected to office right after those kavanaugh hearings. We will not forget! And it is great that we have AOC, Omar, Tlaib and Pressley in office now.

As for how people behave when faced with unfounded allegations and ridiculous "evidence" - please. If you can't handle stress, you shouldn't be a judge.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The more you liberals keep up with your defamation of Kavanaugh - who did NOTHING wrong, the more we are reminded that another seat may open in the coming years.
The more you give us another reason to be sure to get out and vote.
So, keep it up.

We have already seen that GOP thinks pussy grabbing, sexual assault of minors, sexual assault of adults and also election fraud and treason are nothing.
Of course you think Kavanaugh did nothing.

Because you have actual evidence of him doing something wrong - correct? Oh, wait...

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:He should never have been confirmed. He failed the job interview! It's ridiculous to believe half of what he said under oath. If you want to then how about his performance in the interview process? No other job would have hired him. Was he under pressure sure, so are others in interviews. No way he should have gotten the job the way the talked to the people interviewing him. Lifetime appointment? UGH... Bringing his ten year old into the discussion, shame on him! There had to be another candidate.....

Those who refer to his grilling about alleged decades old accusations, by Democratic senators, on live TV, broadcast to millions, as a “job interview,” have zero credibility. That was no job interview and every time you insist otherwise, you just look more idiotic.

So you’re saying he already had the job, no need to actually go through the motions? Or do you just not understand what a metaphor is?

Calling the confirmation hearings, especially the last one in which he had to defend himself against FALSE allegations, merely “job interviews” is a pathetic attempt to try and diminish what he was facing. And you know it.

Ha. His defense of himself was to be completely unable to answer questions put forth to him. He lied his ass off. The republican senators took the opportunity to get on a soapbox and asked him nothing of substance. He lost it on the stand and showed that he shouldn't even be a JUDGE, let alone a supreme court justice.

And you keep saying "FALSE" allegations, I don't think you know what the word FALSE means. He behaved appallingly toward any female senator who questioned him. He showed the US exactly what he is, and that is unfit.

He behaved exactly as I would expect anyone to behave, given unfounded allegations and ridiculous “evidence” taken straight out of his high school yearbook. The entire procedure was an experiment in the absurd and a complete embarrassment to the Democratic senators who engineered the circus. Luckily, their stupidity backfired on them and the entire nation was witness to their complete lunacy. It will never be forgotten.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The more you liberals keep up with your defamation of Kavanaugh - who did NOTHING wrong, the more we are reminded that another seat may open in the coming years.
The more you give us another reason to be sure to get out and vote.
So, keep it up.

We have already seen that GOP thinks pussy grabbing, sexual assault of minors, sexual assault of adults and also election fraud and treason are nothing.
Of course you think Kavanaugh did nothing.

Anonymous wrote:The more you liberals keep up with your defamation of Kavanaugh - who did NOTHING wrong, the more we are reminded that another seat may open in the coming years.
The more you give us another reason to be sure to get out and vote.
So, keep it up.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:He should never have been confirmed. He failed the job interview! It's ridiculous to believe half of what he said under oath. If you want to then how about his performance in the interview process? No other job would have hired him. Was he under pressure sure, so are others in interviews. No way he should have gotten the job the way the talked to the people interviewing him. Lifetime appointment? UGH... Bringing his ten year old into the discussion, shame on him! There had to be another candidate.....

Those who refer to his grilling about alleged decades old accusations, by Democratic senators, on live TV, broadcast to millions, as a “job interview,” have zero credibility. That was no job interview and every time you insist otherwise, you just look more idiotic.

So you’re saying he already had the job, no need to actually go through the motions? Or do you just not understand what a metaphor is?

Calling the confirmation hearings, especially the last one in which he had to defend himself against FALSE allegations, merely “job interviews” is a pathetic attempt to try and diminish what he was facing. And you know it.

Ha. His defense of himself was to be completely unable to answer questions put forth to him. He lied his ass off. The republican senators took the opportunity to get on a soapbox and asked him nothing of substance. He lost it on the stand and showed that he shouldn't even be a JUDGE, let alone a supreme court justice.

And you keep saying "FALSE" allegations, I don't think you know what the word FALSE means. He behaved appallingly toward any female senator who questioned him. He showed the US exactly what he is, and that is unfit.

Anonymous wrote:The more you liberals keep up with your defamation of Kavanaugh - who did NOTHING wrong, the more we are reminded that another seat may open in the coming years.
The more you give us another reason to be sure to get out and vote.
So, keep it up.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:He should never have been confirmed. He failed the job interview! It's ridiculous to believe half of what he said under oath. If you want to then how about his performance in the interview process? No other job would have hired him. Was he under pressure sure, so are others in interviews. No way he should have gotten the job the way the talked to the people interviewing him. Lifetime appointment? UGH... Bringing his ten year old into the discussion, shame on him! There had to be another candidate.....

Those who refer to his grilling about alleged decades old accusations, by Democratic senators, on live TV, broadcast to millions, as a “job interview,” have zero credibility. That was no job interview and every time you insist otherwise, you just look more idiotic.

So you’re saying he already had the job, no need to actually go through the motions? Or do you just not understand what a metaphor is?

Calling the confirmation hearings, especially the last one in which he had to defend himself against FALSE allegations, merely “job interviews” is a pathetic attempt to try and diminish what he was facing. And you know it.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:He should never have been confirmed. He failed the job interview! It's ridiculous to believe half of what he said under oath. If you want to then how about his performance in the interview process? No other job would have hired him. Was he under pressure sure, so are others in interviews. No way he should have gotten the job the way the talked to the people interviewing him. Lifetime appointment? UGH... Bringing his ten year old into the discussion, shame on him! There had to be another candidate.....

Those who refer to his grilling about alleged decades old accusations, by Democratic senators, on live TV, broadcast to millions, as a “job interview,” have zero credibility. That was no job interview and every time you insist otherwise, you just look more idiotic.

So you’re saying he already had the job, no need to actually go through the motions? Or do you just not understand what a metaphor is?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:He should never have been confirmed. He failed the job interview! It's ridiculous to believe half of what he said under oath. If you want to then how about his performance in the interview process? No other job would have hired him. Was he under pressure sure, so are others in interviews. No way he should have gotten the job the way the talked to the people interviewing him. Lifetime appointment? UGH... Bringing his ten year old into the discussion, shame on him! There had to be another candidate.....

Those who refer to his grilling about alleged decades old accusations, by Democratic senators, on live TV, broadcast to millions, as a “job interview,” have zero credibility. That was no job interview and every time you insist otherwise, you just look more idiotic.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Questions regarding his debts were answered in closed door hearings to the SJC. If there was anything there the Dems absolutely would have used it against him.

Yep. The liberals here are not terribly informed and cannot think critically.

We'll see if they bring it up when he is impeached. Maybe it was something that looked innocent then but now there is a trail leading to Russia (like the NRA, for example). Who knows.

There are many reasons that he is unfit and compromised without the debts.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Questions regarding his debts were answered in closed door hearings to the SJC. If there was anything there the Dems absolutely would have used it against him.

Yep. The liberals here are not terribly informed and cannot think critically.