There really isn't much to explain. This is yet another manufactured story, like Vince Foster, emails, Bengazi, all of the Nunes stuff down to Uranium One and Page-Strozak where the right is trying to do something to distract from its own actual crimes against the United States.

This has nothing to do with the current story. However, everyone of those things--with the exception, perhaps, of Vince Foster--has some basis in reality. And, please think about this--if one of Trump's senior advisors committed suicide, don't you think there would be some suspicions?

Emails: Comey did everything but say Clinton was guilty. There are certainly many reasons to believe the investigation was not conducted properly. Including a very inappropriate meeting on the tarmac between Bill and Loretta.
Benghazi: sending Rice out to repeat a lie five times on Sunday shows--when Clinton herself told Chelsea it was terrorism.
Uranium One: this is definitely troubling. Once more, if this happened with Trump, the Dems would be screaming, and so would the media.
Page-Strozk is documented. They were demoted and there is no question that Strozk was a powerful investigator at FBI. If this does not trouble you, you are in the tank with him or incredibly naive.

Anonymous wrote:http://dailycaller.com/2018/04/01/democrats-pakistani-background-checks/

Links to other stories are in the article and listed below. Almost every story has specific documentation. There is a lot to this.

The guy first went to work for Robert Wexler. He is the one who should have done the background check, but since he is no longer in Congress, he is not part of the 44 members DC is going on about.

Naturally Daily Caller did not mention that they omitted the one person who should actually have done the background check. Liars figuring.

Anonymous wrote:There really isn't much to explain. This is yet another manufactured story, like Vince Foster, emails, Bengazi, all of the Nunes stuff down to Uranium One and Page-Strozak where the right is trying to do something to distract from its own actual crimes against the United States.

There are plenty of legitimate news sources and court filings demonstrating that the Dems put very questionable people in charge of their IT and that government information security was consequently compromised. So the question is: Are you ignorant or just lying?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Can any democrat explain this?

They have no satisfactory explanation. So they are just collectively trying to ignore it and hope it goes away.

What makes it especially interesting is that the Dems keep telling us that the DNC was hacked by the Russians--and, yet, they had these guys running their IT on the Hill. It is certainly not out of the question that DWS's IT staffer had access to her DNC account.

And, the DNC never let the FBI look at their server. And, one of their IT staffers was killed with no suspect. Nothing to see here.

Serious question, but why would the democrats hire these people? What is the benefit to using them instead of a cleared IT contractor?

Anonymous wrote:Can any democrat explain this?

They have no satisfactory explanation. So they are just collectively trying to ignore it and hope it goes away.

https://www.politico.com/story/2017/03/house-democrats-it-staffers-hina-alvi-imran-awan-235569

Here's a Politico story. But, it is nowhere near as comprehensive as the other link.

If the story is worth picking up, then a legitimate media outlet will report on it. I'm not reading that biased garbage website.

And, this is what people mean by media bias. A story is well sourced --but, ignored because it does not suit the MSM support of the Democrats. 44 Dems were using questionable IT staffers to conduct their IT needs. People who had access to their information--and, yet, no backgrouond checks. One of the Dems served on the House Intelligence Committee. Scary.

There really isn't much to explain. This is yet another manufactured story, like Vince Foster, emails, Bengazi, all of the Nunes stuff down to Uranium One and Page-Strozak where the right is trying to do something to distract from its own actual crimes against the United States.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Can any democrat explain this?

Reported by the Daily Caller and Russian trolls. Enough said.

Once again, the story is sourced on DC is sourced. The Dems cannot explain it.

Sourced to whom? Post them.

Go read the articles. Court documents are sourced for one thing.

If the story is worth picking up, then a legitimate media outlet will report on it. I'm not reading that biased garbage website.

http://dailycaller.com/2018/04/01/democrats-pakistani-background-checks/

Links to other stories are in the article and listed below. Almost every story has specific documentation. There is a lot to this.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Can any democrat explain this?

Reported by the Daily Caller and Russian trolls. Enough said.

Once again, the story is sourced on DC is sourced. The Dems cannot explain it.

Sourced to whom? Post them.

Go read the articles. Court documents are sourced for one thing.

Anonymous wrote:Can any democrat explain this?

Time to go beddy-bye, Boris

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Can any democrat explain this?

Reported by the Daily Caller and Russian trolls. Enough said.

Once again, the story is sourced on DC is sourced. The Dems cannot explain it.

Sourced to whom? Post them.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Can any democrat explain this?

Reported by the Daily Caller and Russian trolls. Enough said.

Once again, the story is sourced on DC is sourced. The Dems cannot explain it.