Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I believe most poor people are poor because they are lazy.
I'm a teacher. Tell that to my legal immigrant Latino parents of the kids in my class. They work three jobs just to put clothes on their children's backs. Give it a break.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I think most/all fat women are bitter and defensive and make for terrible employees. I have turned down jobs because there are too many overweight/middle aged women in the chain of command.
Yup. Would never hire fatty or smoker.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:SAHDs are lazy slobs who watch porn at nap time.
Ha, I would say the opposite. My husband was a SAHD for a few weeks between contract gigs. Holy shit- the house was clean, dinner was made, our son had his run of the museums. I find SAHDs to be better suited for job because they are not obsessed with playing into a gender role or being marginalized. They just like keeping shit organized.
Anonymous wrote:SAHDs are lazy slobs who watch porn at nap time.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I prefer the lifestyle in other developed countries (Germany, the Netherlands, Belgium, France, Italy, Switzerland, Spain, Denmark, Sweden, Canada, Australia, New Zealand, etc) over the lifestyle in the US. The idea that the U.S. is the greatest county on earth is a joke. It would only be great for those who are considerably wealthy.
I agree. I'm pretty sure I was supposed to be born in Scandinavia.
And this is coming from someone with 2 degrees in American Government.
Anonymous wrote:I prefer the lifestyle in other developed countries (Germany, the Netherlands, Belgium, France, Italy, Switzerland, Spain, Denmark, Sweden, Canada, Australia, New Zealand, etc) over the lifestyle in the US. The idea that the U.S. is the greatest county on earth is a joke. It would only be great for those who are considerably wealthy.
Anonymous wrote:
I went to W&M and I deeply regret it. I started out at a large public school that was ranked higher but didn't like the atmosphere, so I transferred. W&M is academically challenging and known to be grade-deflating, vs other schools that more readily give out good grades. Many people outside of the world of academia and especially the DMV area don't know of William and Mary. Nobody knows of it abroad. I barely graduated with a 3.0 (I had a 3.7 at UCLA). I don't think my grades are good enough to do something post grad at highly ranked schools abroad because I transferred there. They won't know about W&M's reputation for being tough on grades, so they will just think I didn't work very hard. Not the case. Not all schools are created equal.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I think private tuition for college is only worth it if your kid can get into a top 10 (maybe top 15) school; if they can get into an ivy or Stanford, Chicago/Caltech/MIT or the like -- I can consider parents doing everything possible to make it happen.
But what I really don't get is the parents (who are not independently wealthy) killing themselves to make sure that their princess can go to her dream school -- Boston U or Babson or Middlebury or whatever. I say if you can't make the cut for the top 10, go to your in-state school. The education offered is no different and the name on the resume just doesn't mean anything once you get below a certain level. If you're an engineer from MIT or a finance grad from Wharton/UPenn -- that stands out in some circles and often for life; but your typical person and hiring manager cannot tell you whether a chemistry degree from Maryland is any better or worse than one from Boston U.
Now if the parents are independently wealthy -- do whatever you want. I just don't see killing myself or letting a kid take out HUGE loans bc they can imagine themselves on a certain campus -- I guarantee they'll be fine on some other, cheaper campus as well.
100% agree. Every word. No kid of mine is going to Davidson or University of Richmond. NFW.
+1. Add to this -- I also wouldn't pay out of state tuition to go to a state school in another state because a program is marginally better. If we're still living in Maryland by the time DCs are 18, they are going to UMD. I don't particularly care if Penn State or Rutgers has an undergrad business school or engineering school or whatever ranked 10 places higher than UMD and frankly I don't think hiring managers care either because they don't keep rankings memorized; I think they look at a resume they see -- ok -- big northeastern state school, how well did applicant do there. Now if they can get themselves into a Wharton undergrad or Sloan (MIT) business school then that's a different ballgame and I'll do what I can to make it happen bc those schools do open doors to different kinds of jobs at higher salaries and offer different types of mobility over the years -- I've seen it time and time again. Same thing with fields like engineering -- Caltech, MIT etc. are show stoppers -- otherwise state school like everyone else.
+2. The hand-wringing I've seen on this forum about DCs potentially attending a state school is ludicrous.
I don't wring my hands about it, but while my state university wasn't on the order of today's tuition, it wasn't cheap, either. It's not like back in the day when you could work and cover the costs of tuition plus a simple apartment with a roommate.
I really do NOT want my children to go to school in VA. I think there is great value in seeing a different areas of the world. Plus VA seems exceptionally backwards. Only school that is borderline ok is W&M.
I would hope that they have at least the same level of education I did - or better - but I know that it's much tougher to get into top schools these days.
I went to W&M and I deeply regret it. I started out at a large public school that was ranked higher but didn't like the atmosphere, so I transferred. W&M is academically challenging and known to be grade-deflating, vs other schools that more readily give out good grades. Many people outside of the world of academia and especially the DMV area don't know of William and Mary. Nobody knows of it abroad. I barely graduated with a 3.0 (I had a 3.7 at UCLA). I don't think my grades are good enough to do something post grad at highly ranked schools abroad because I transferred there. They won't know about W&M's reputation for being tough on grades, so they will just think I didn't work very hard. Not the case. Not all schools are created equal.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I wish American society didn't put athletes and those in the entertainment industry on pedestals.
Oh, I completely agree. And don't think they deserve to make the sickening amounts of money they make. Our priorities are completely out of whack.
And on the other end of the spectrum, I think college athlete who pull in major money for universities should be able to make some sort of profit.
Fuck no. The athlete worship in this country is insane. WHO CARES if you can throw a ball, you're not saving lives.
NFL should not be a tax-exempt organization. We should cap players' salaries.