Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I agree.
I have always thought that the vivid animosity against Hardy in this thread can only come from people with some stakes in either the private school sector or charters.
If you are an IB family, i.e. you own a real estate property in the area, you would see Hardy's recent dynamic with a favorable and supporting eye. Unless the undergoing efforts and positive results are harming your vested interests.
Exactly. But one need only look at the number of pages (67 and counting) and views (almost 20k) to see that people are really watching this closely. At Key, there are so many families for whom private would be really, really taxing . . . but there is also such peer pressure against Hardy.
We are one of those families, and would love for Hardy to become as alluring an option as Key itself. Do you foresee the peer pressure shifting as Hardy does?
The Hyde & Stoddert families will lead the charge. The Key mommies are more stuck generally speaking.
Anonymous wrote:This again?
Why would we need another WOTP middle school when one of the schools that we already have has over 80% of their seats available for oob kids?
I am of course being sarcastic because I know the answer is "because Palisades families want their OWN middle school".
Truth. They failed before and they're even more ridiculous sounding now.
This again?
Why would we need another WOTP middle school when one of the schools that we already have has over 80% of their seats available for oob kids?
I am of course being sarcastic because I know the answer is "because Palisades families want their OWN middle school".
Anonymous wrote:I think this thread is also evidence of the increase because people wouldn't be arguing so much about it if it didn't look like Hardy might be considered more acceptable by more IB families. Which is why I'm really glad it wasn't acceptable when dd was in middle school because I was very happy to get my OOB kid into that school.Anonymous wrote:Agreed, but it's the rate of increase that matters. I'm betting that come next year there will be more ib kids than pages in this thread. And the year after that. And the...
I think this thread is also evidence of the increase because people wouldn't be arguing so much about it if it didn't look like Hardy might be considered more acceptable by more IB families. Which is why I'm really glad it wasn't acceptable when dd was in middle school because I was very happy to get my OOB kid into that school.Anonymous wrote:Agreed, but it's the rate of increase that matters. I'm betting that come next year there will be more ib kids than pages in this thread. And the year after that. And the...
Anonymous wrote:
We are one of those families, and would love for Hardy to become as alluring an option as Key itself. Do you foresee the peer pressure shifting as Hardy does?
Anonymous wrote:This again?
Why would we need another WOTP middle school when one of the schools that we already have has over 80% of their seats available for oob kids?
I am of course being sarcastic because I know the answer is "because Palisades families want their OWN middle school".
Anonymous wrote:This again?
Why would we need another WOTP middle school when one of the schools that we already have has over 80% of their seats available for oob kids?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I agree.
I have always thought that the vivid animosity against Hardy in this thread can only come from people with some stakes in either the private school sector or charters.
If you are an IB family, i.e. you own a real estate property in the area, you would see Hardy's recent dynamic with a favorable and supporting eye. Unless the undergoing efforts and positive results are harming your vested interests.
Exactly. But one need only look at the number of pages (67 and counting) and views (almost 20k) to see that people are really watching this closely. At Key, there are so many families for whom private would be really, really taxing . . . but there is also such peer pressure against Hardy.
We are one of those families, and would love for Hardy to become as alluring an option as Key itself. Do you foresee the peer pressure shifting as Hardy does?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I agree.
I have always thought that the vivid animosity against Hardy in this thread can only come from people with some stakes in either the private school sector or charters.
If you are an IB family, i.e. you own a real estate property in the area, you would see Hardy's recent dynamic with a favorable and supporting eye. Unless the undergoing efforts and positive results are harming your vested interests.
Exactly. But one need only look at the number of pages (67 and counting) and views (almost 20k) to see that people are really watching this closely. At Key, there are so many families for whom private would be really, really taxing . . . but there is also such peer pressure against Hardy.
We are one of those families, and would love for Hardy to become as alluring an option as Key itself. Do you foresee the peer pressure shifting as Hardy does?
The Hyde & Stoddert families will lead the charge. The Key mommies are more stuck generally speaking.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I agree.
I have always thought that the vivid animosity against Hardy in this thread can only come from people with some stakes in either the private school sector or charters.
If you are an IB family, i.e. you own a real estate property in the area, you would see Hardy's recent dynamic with a favorable and supporting eye. Unless the undergoing efforts and positive results are harming your vested interests.
Exactly. But one need only look at the number of pages (67 and counting) and views (almost 20k) to see that people are really watching this closely. At Key, there are so many families for whom private would be really, really taxing . . . but there is also such peer pressure against Hardy.
We are one of those families, and would love for Hardy to become as alluring an option as Key itself. Do you foresee the peer pressure shifting as Hardy does?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I agree.
I have always thought that the vivid animosity against Hardy in this thread can only come from people with some stakes in either the private school sector or charters.
If you are an IB family, i.e. you own a real estate property in the area, you would see Hardy's recent dynamic with a favorable and supporting eye. Unless the undergoing efforts and positive results are harming your vested interests.
Exactly. But one need only look at the number of pages (67 and counting) and views (almost 20k) to see that people are really watching this closely. At Key, there are so many families for whom private would be really, really taxing . . . but there is also such peer pressure against Hardy.