Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It's being reported she resigned. However, Astronomer has not said if they did or did not pay out a large severance for her to resign in lieu of a protracted lawsuit.
Astronomer HR exec Kristin Cabot seen for first time without her wedding ring as she resigns over Coldplay kiss cam scandal
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-14937675/Astronomer-HR-exec-Kristin-Cabot-resigns-shes-seen-time-without-wedding-ring-Coldplay-kisscam-scandal.html
Anonymous wrote:It's being reported she resigned. However, Astronomer has not said if they did or did not pay out a large severance for her to resign in lieu of a protracted lawsuit.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The hr woman is so ugly and old, it's totally embarrassing to the CEO, career-ending based on how ugly and old it means he has no game or ability to manage anything or get someone worthy of cheating on, low class and sad for him, he deserves to be fired, divorced, and put in prison.
He's no looker.
Right? I love the assumption that a 58 year old tech dweeb can organically do so much better. Spoiler: He can't.
He's worth 20m-70M. He could be an obese 75yo and he could get a 25yo model airhead. $$$$$ talks!!
He lives in a 1.4m house in Worcester and his wife is a teacher…. He is worth nowhere near that.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The hr woman is so ugly and old, it's totally embarrassing to the CEO, career-ending based on how ugly and old it means he has no game or ability to manage anything or get someone worthy of cheating on, low class and sad for him, he deserves to be fired, divorced, and put in prison.
He's no looker.
Right? I love the assumption that a 58 year old tech dweeb can organically do so much better. Spoiler: He can't.
He's worth 20m-70M. He could be an obese 75yo and he could get a 25yo model airhead. $$$$$ talks!!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It's hilarious. And props to GP and Chris Martin for keeping their divorce clean.Anonymous wrote:This has officially jumped the shark and they paid Gwyneth Paltrow millions of dollars to shoot a 60 second cheeky ad. So painfully cringe. This is clearly not a serious company. And shame on Paltrow for inserting herself into her ex-husband’s hyper viral moment.
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-14942209/Gwyneth-Paltrow-Astronomer-CEO-affair-scandal.html
+1 It's perfect!!
A washed up divorced actress thirsty for attention (and a quick buck) making light of adultery, broken families, and innocent spouses and minor kids being humiliated and permanently hurt. So cheeky & hilarious!
Not.
It is totally classless and piling on the innocent parties involved. I’d say shame on Paltrow but she clearly has no shame.
Agreed - this was so low class and tacky by Paltrow and the company. wtf were they thinking?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It's hilarious. And props to GP and Chris Martin for keeping their divorce clean.Anonymous wrote:This has officially jumped the shark and they paid Gwyneth Paltrow millions of dollars to shoot a 60 second cheeky ad. So painfully cringe. This is clearly not a serious company. And shame on Paltrow for inserting herself into her ex-husband’s hyper viral moment.
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-14942209/Gwyneth-Paltrow-Astronomer-CEO-affair-scandal.html
+1 It's perfect!!
A washed up divorced actress thirsty for attention (and a quick buck) making light of adultery, broken families, and innocent spouses and minor kids being humiliated and permanently hurt. So cheeky & hilarious!
Not.
It is totally classless and piling on the innocent parties involved. I’d say shame on Paltrow but she clearly has no shame.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It's hilarious. And props to GP and Chris Martin for keeping their divorce clean.Anonymous wrote:This has officially jumped the shark and they paid Gwyneth Paltrow millions of dollars to shoot a 60 second cheeky ad. So painfully cringe. This is clearly not a serious company. And shame on Paltrow for inserting herself into her ex-husband’s hyper viral moment.
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-14942209/Gwyneth-Paltrow-Astronomer-CEO-affair-scandal.html
+1 It's perfect!!
Anonymous wrote:This stupid story needs to die. Enough. Let's move on.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The hr woman is so ugly and old, it's totally embarrassing to the CEO, career-ending based on how ugly and old it means he has no game or ability to manage anything or get someone worthy of cheating on, low class and sad for him, he deserves to be fired, divorced, and put in prison.
He's no looker.
Right? I love the assumption that a 58 year old tech dweeb can organically do so much better. Spoiler: He can't.
He's worth 20m-70M. He could be an obese 75yo and he could get a 25yo model airhead. $$$$$ talks!!
You people are clueless. Where does a 58 year old married dweeb meet 25 year old models eager to sleep with him? Your juvenile hypotheticals are not real life, where things happen organically because you’re in proximity to each other. Unless the guy wanted prostitutes or de facto prostitutes off of seeking arrangements, the most likely affair partner is a 40 or 50 something middle aged colleague or industry peer.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The hr woman is so ugly and old, it's totally embarrassing to the CEO, career-ending based on how ugly and old it means he has no game or ability to manage anything or get someone worthy of cheating on, low class and sad for him, he deserves to be fired, divorced, and put in prison.
He's no looker.
Right? I love the assumption that a 58 year old tech dweeb can organically do so much better. Spoiler: He can't.
He's worth 20m-70M. He could be an obese 75yo and he could get a 25yo model airhead. $$$$$ talks!!