Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

One person’s socialism is another person’s neighborliness.

So if you’re against socialism, then you support ending social security and Medicare, right?

DP
I’m fine with them. Pretty sure they’ve been around for longer than I have, and we are not a socialist country.
But good try.

Pp here. I support them as well. But they are “socialist” policies. I’m tired of people saying how much they hate “socialism” when they clearly support a lot of “socialist” policies.

The interstate highway system is also socialist, as is the US Postal system, the military, the FAA and a host of other "government services"

Exactly! That’s my point. We have many “socialist” programs. They are good for our economy and our people. Which is why people who criticize Walz (and others) for being a “socialist”need to stop and think about what policies they are objecting to. My guess is that the folks who are so angry about “socialist” politicians are happy to collect their disability checks and complain loudly about potholes not being fixed.

Move to Venezuela- they love socialism

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

One person’s socialism is another person’s neighborliness.

So if you’re against socialism, then you support ending social security and Medicare, right?

DP
I’m fine with them. Pretty sure they’ve been around for longer than I have, and we are not a socialist country.
But good try.

Pp here. I support them as well. But they are “socialist” policies. I’m tired of people saying how much they hate “socialism” when they clearly support a lot of “socialist” policies.

The interstate highway system is also socialist, as is the US Postal system, the military, the FAA and a host of other "government services"

Exactly! That’s my point. We have many “socialist” programs. They are good for our economy and our people. Which is why people who criticize Walz (and others) for being a “socialist”need to stop and think about what policies they are objecting to. My guess is that the folks who are so angry about “socialist” politicians are happy to collect their disability checks and complain loudly about potholes not being fixed.

Move to Venezuela- they love socialism

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Maga is in panic

Uh oh one of the crazy white liberal women posting obsessively on here thinks MAGA is in panic! Sorry but conservatives aren't threatened by Tampon Tim. His crazy leftist record is more than enough ammo to use against him.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Maga is in panic

Uh oh one of the crazy white liberal women posting obsessively on here thinks MAGA is in panic! Sorry but conservatives aren't threatened by Tampon Tim. His crazy leftist record is more than enough ammo to use against him.

Anonymous wrote:If there was any question about the far left controlling a Kamala Harris White House, she just erased any doubt with this choice.

There is no doubt she will be controlled by the far left.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Maga is in panic

Full blown. It's all trans in bathrooms and George Floyd/riots! That's all they got. Wait until they start hearing him speak! This is going to be delicious.

The riots and overall breakdown of law and order in our cities is where the Democrats are most vulnerable. Expect to hear about Kamala’s San Francisco and Tim’s Minneapolis nonstop for the next three months.

Did January 6th not happen? I don't understand how GOP are so concerned about some riots and not others. It's weird.

Bingo

All riots should be equally disdained regardless of the issue behind it because more often than not it's some nut job extremist thugs who don't actually care about the issue behind it....but as such should also be equally prosecuted and equally thought of as wrong regardless of the issue. It's never ok to destroy property regardless of the issue or topic period.

I agree. I read an article about The riots in MN and poor reaction time. Walz was very honest about it all and how it was not handled well. Now contrast that with Trump who still thinks January 6th was a good thing.

True - but I also know many Dems who think the BLM riots were a good thing too.

Dems supported the peaceful protests and criticized where the looting and property damage took place.

Well I'll rephrase,"I have personally spoken to more than one Dem who feels the looting and property damage was justified". But we are going off-topic now. Back to Tim Walz....honestly...I don't care how he reacted to the BLM riots because it was an extremely difficult time. I also don't care about anything he did or didn't do 20 yrs ago. I do care about his political views and social ideology which are too progressive for my taste. Not saying it's going to make me vote for Trump but I am now strongly considering staying home...and this is coming from someone who was pushing their DD to go out and vote because of the importance of voting - DD doesn't care to vote this year either. I can see her point of view.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Maga is in panic

Full blown. It's all trans in bathrooms and George Floyd/riots! That's all they got. Wait until they start hearing him speak! This is going to be delicious.

The riots and overall breakdown of law and order in our cities is where the Democrats are most vulnerable. Expect to hear about Kamala’s San Francisco and Tim’s Minneapolis nonstop for the next three months.

Did January 6th not happen? I don't understand how GOP are so concerned about some riots and not others. It's weird.

Bingo

All riots should be equally disdained regardless of the issue behind it because more often than not it's some nut job extremist thugs who don't actually care about the issue behind it....but as such should also be equally prosecuted and equally thought of as wrong regardless of the issue. It's never ok to destroy property regardless of the issue or topic period.

I agree. I read an article about The riots in MN and poor reaction time. Walz was very honest about it all and how it was not handled well. Now contrast that with Trump who still thinks January 6th was a good thing.

True - but I also know many Dems who think the BLM riots were a good thing too.

Dems supported the peaceful protests and criticized where the looting and property damage took place.

Well I'll rephrase,"I have personally spoken to more than one Dem who feels the looting and property damage was justified". But we are going off-topic now. Back to Tim Walz....honestly...I don't care how he reacted to the BLM riots because it was an extremely difficult time. I also don't care about anything he did or didn't do 20 yrs ago. I do care about his political views and social ideology which are too progressive for my taste. Not saying it's going to make me vote for Trump but I am now strongly considering staying home...and this is coming from someone who was pushing their DD to go out and vote because of the importance of voting - DD doesn't care to vote this year either. I can see her point of view.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I’ll take a DUI arrest from 30 years over a rapist any day.

The GOP voted for George W Bush and this issue wasn't problematic. Walz's charges were reduced to reckless driving. Walz was fined $200 plus court costs, which include the costs of the police alcohol test. He no longer drinks alcohol so apparently learned from this incident.

IMO - worse than the drunk driving charge is him trying to claim to be deaf to get out of it.

That was looked into and he does have hearing loss in both ears and even had surgery for it.

He can’t hear.
He almost killed someone drinking.
He left the military before combat.
He presided over lawless Minneapolis.
And he is Tampon Tim?

Wow so far this is quite a winning bunch of stats

Your lot is a joyless bunch of scolds. Good luck shitting on everyone's dad, a hotplate making social studies teacher and football coach. You look at this dude and start screaming, "tampons, tampons, tampons" and wonder why people think you're a bunch of weirdos.

This sums it up nicely.
Why is the GOP so angry all of the time?

And weird. Let's not forget that. They're weird and obsessed with transfolks and bathrooms and women's bodies.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:[twitter]https://mobile.x.com/EndWokeness/status/1820829060223627563[twitter]

Since it got buried in the thread (understandably) the new Minnesota flag has become a point of contention for white supremacists in Minnesota. They are very upset about it and many fly the old flag as a white supremacist virtue signal.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I’ll take a DUI arrest from 30 years over a rapist any day.

The GOP voted for George W Bush and this issue wasn't problematic. Walz's charges were reduced to reckless driving. Walz was fined $200 plus court costs, which include the costs of the police alcohol test. He no longer drinks alcohol so apparently learned from this incident.

IMO - worse than the drunk driving charge is him trying to claim to be deaf to get out of it.

That was looked into and he does have hearing loss in both ears and even had surgery for it.

He can’t hear.
He almost killed someone drinking.
He left the military before combat.
He presided over lawless Minneapolis.
And he is Tampon Tim?

Wow so far this is quite a winning bunch of stats

Your lot is a joyless bunch of scolds. Good luck shitting on everyone's dad, a hotplate making social studies teacher and football coach. You look at this dude and start screaming, "tampons, tampons, tampons" and wonder why people think you're a bunch of weirdos.

This sums it up nicely.
Why is the GOP so angry all of the time?

Anonymous wrote:If there was any question about the far left controlling a Kamala Harris White House, she just erased any doubt with this choice.

There is no doubt she will be controlled by the far left.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I’ll take a DUI arrest from 30 years over a rapist any day.

The GOP voted for George W Bush and this issue wasn't problematic. Walz's charges were reduced to reckless driving. Walz was fined $200 plus court costs, which include the costs of the police alcohol test. He no longer drinks alcohol so apparently learned from this incident.

IMO - worse than the drunk driving charge is him trying to claim to be deaf to get out of it.

That was looked into and he does have hearing loss in both ears and even had surgery for it.

He can’t hear.
He almost killed someone drinking.
He left the military before combat.
He presided over lawless Minneapolis.
And he is Tampon Tim?

Wow so far this is quite a winning bunch of stats

Your lot is a joyless bunch of scolds. Good luck shitting on everyone's dad, a hotplate making social studies teacher and football coach. You look at this dude and start screaming, "tampons, tampons, tampons" and wonder why people think you're a bunch of weirdos.

This sums it up nicely.
Why is the GOP so angry all of the time?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

One person’s socialism is another person’s neighborliness.

So if you’re against socialism, then you support ending social security and Medicare, right?

DP
I’m fine with them. Pretty sure they’ve been around for longer than I have, and we are not a socialist country.
But good try.

Pp here. I support them as well. But they are “socialist” policies. I’m tired of people saying how much they hate “socialism” when they clearly support a lot of “socialist” policies.

The interstate highway system is also socialist, as is the US Postal system, the military, the FAA and a host of other "government services"

Exactly! That’s my point. We have many “socialist” programs. They are good for our economy and our people. Which is why people who criticize Walz (and others) for being a “socialist”need to stop and think about what policies they are objecting to. My guess is that the folks who are so angry about “socialist” politicians are happy to collect their disability checks and complain loudly about potholes not being fixed.