Anonymous wrote:
No he doesn't. He's telling you he doesn't want the government designing our appliances and putting forth ridiculous fiat regulations because they don't know WTF they're doing.
The whole reasoning behind many of the regulations today is to make Washington Dc feel like it has control over the people rather than any good reasons.
They make these idiotic decisions and then there are unintended consequences that everyone has to live with (except them - they often write exceptions for themselves).
He's not arrogant. Our overlords in Washington DC are!
Anonymous wrote:Explain the shark and Hannibal Lector fixations, please. I'd like to know how they are so important that they'd be prominently mentioned by a candidate for U.S. President.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I guess, but the message Trump is really conveying is he doesn't want the government designing goods and products and lawyers in air-conditioned buildings who can't change a flat tire on their car to put out regulations "for the betterment of society", because they don't know WTF they're doing.
See the EPA.
Clueless. The government isn't "designing" anything. They set standards, and it's industry that comes up with the design to meet the standards. And the standards aren't even remotely arbitrary, they are based on data (much of which also comes form industry), like whether the amount of water we want to consume is sustainable relative to the amount of water that we can draw down from aquifers and reservoirs. And by the way, Trump's anecdotes are absolutely delusional, I've never even remotely had to flush a toilet "10 or 15 times" as he hyperbolically claims.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
No he doesn't. He's telling you he doesn't want the government designing our appliances and putting forth ridiculous fiat regulations because they don't know WTF they're doing.
The whole reasoning behind many of the regulations today is to make Washington Dc feel like it has control over the people rather than any good reasons.
They make these idiotic decisions and then there are unintended consequences that everyone has to live with (except them - they often write exceptions for themselves).
He's not arrogant. Our overlords in Washington DC are!
Please explain the sharks and batteries.
Batteries?
Maybe because 46% of EV owners want to go back to gasoline powered cars. Original study and presentation from McKinsey was posted here. I'm not going to post it again.
Anonymous wrote:I guess, but the message Trump is really conveying is he doesn't want the government designing goods and products and lawyers in air-conditioned buildings who can't change a flat tire on their car to put out regulations "for the betterment of society", because they don't know WTF they're doing.
See the EPA.
Anonymous wrote:I guess, but the message Trump is really conveying is he doesn't want the government designing goods and products and lawyers in air-conditioned buildings who can't change a flat tire on their car to put out regulations "for the betterment of society", because they don't know WTF they're doing.
See the EPA.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
No he doesn't. He's telling you he doesn't want the government designing our appliances and putting forth ridiculous fiat regulations because they don't know WTF they're doing.
The whole reasoning behind many of the regulations today is to make Washington Dc feel like it has control over the people rather than any good reasons.
They make these idiotic decisions and then there are unintended consequences that everyone has to live with (except them - they often write exceptions for themselves).
He's not arrogant. Our overlords in Washington DC are!
Please explain the sharks and batteries.
Batteries?
Maybe because 46% of EV owners want to go back to gasoline powered cars. Original study and presentation from McKinsey was posted here. I'm not going to post it again.
Sure. That’s what he’s saying. He’s not saying that a battery is so heavy that it’s going to sink the boat, followed up by whether you’d then rather abandon ship near the battery or near the shark.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
No he doesn't. He's telling you he doesn't want the government designing our appliances and putting forth ridiculous fiat regulations because they don't know WTF they're doing.
The whole reasoning behind many of the regulations today is to make Washington Dc feel like it has control over the people rather than any good reasons.
They make these idiotic decisions and then there are unintended consequences that everyone has to live with (except them - they often write exceptions for themselves).
He's not arrogant. Our overlords in Washington DC are!
Please explain the sharks and batteries.
Batteries?
Maybe because 46% of EV owners want to go back to gasoline powered cars. Original study and presentation from McKinsey was posted here. I'm not going to post it again.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
No he doesn't. He's telling you he doesn't want the government designing our appliances and putting forth ridiculous fiat regulations because they don't know WTF they're doing.
The whole reasoning behind many of the regulations today is to make Washington Dc feel like it has control over the people rather than any good reasons.
They make these idiotic decisions and then there are unintended consequences that everyone has to live with (except them - they often write exceptions for themselves).
He's not arrogant. Our overlords in Washington DC are!
Please explain the sharks and batteries.
Anonymous wrote:
No he doesn't. He's telling you he doesn't want the government designing our appliances and putting forth ridiculous fiat regulations because they don't know WTF they're doing.
The whole reasoning behind many of the regulations today is to make Washington Dc feel like it has control over the people rather than any good reasons.
They make these idiotic decisions and then there are unintended consequences that everyone has to live with (except them - they often write exceptions for themselves).
He's not arrogant. Our overlords in Washington DC are!
Anonymous wrote:
He is just so WEIRD. Such a bizarre person with such bizarre fixations. Low flow water fixtures (which I don't think are really a problem?/have been around for a long time), sharks, windmills, his MIT uncle, cognitive tests. I think it would hilarious if Biden could get him into these tangents at the debate.