Anonymous wrote:Has anyone gone this route? In light of the ethical issues related to the diamond trade?
Were you happy?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Like Blade Runner where real animals remained more valuable than synthetic copies, real mined diamonds are typically worth more than lab created diamonds because they are naturally formed, finite, and harder to replace. Even if they look similar, the market often places a premium on rarity, authenticity, and natural origin. Lab diamonds can offer great visual value, but real mined diamonds usually carry stronger prestige and long term perceived worth.
Looks like DeBeers got desperate enough to send a shill.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I know two millennial young women that are using the natural diamonds inherited from their fiance's grandmothers in their engagement rings. I also received my diamond from my husband's grandmother and would gladly pass mine along to a young relative who is interested. Reset, cleaned and polished to shine for another three or four decades!
Family heirlooms are always special and you can’t put a price on that. I don’t think anyone is suggesting people toss the diamonds that they have, we’re just saying be aware that the supply of lab diamonds will impact the price and status of mined diamonds.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Lab or fake diamonds are marked and it's easy to tell because they have no imperfections so it's fake
So they’re too perfect? Make it make sense
Correct. Too perfect is a flaw in and of itself.
Diamonds are a *natural* phenomenon. Just because you can create a perfect carbon crystal in a laboratory doesn’t mean it’s a diamond.
A diamond was created by natural processes. Lab created carbon crystals were not. Just because they are chemically indistinguishable doesn’t matter, if the process they were created was different.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Lab or fake diamonds are marked and it's easy to tell because they have no imperfections so it's fake
So they’re too perfect? Make it make sense
Correct. Too perfect is a flaw in and of itself.
Diamonds are a *natural* phenomenon. Just because you can create a perfect carbon crystal in a laboratory doesn’t mean it’s a diamond.
A diamond was created by natural processes. Lab created carbon crystals were not. Just because they are chemically indistinguishable doesn’t matter, if the process they were created was different.
Not buying it
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Very low resale value but if you don’t care about that buy them. Nobody will be able to tell visually. You need a tester to know the difference. If you want something investment worthy look for natural untreated colored stones with GIA or AGL certifications.
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Diamonds are not an investment. They do not appreciate and you will not get back anything near what you paid a jeweler.
All jewelry has a very low resale value. Only someone bad with money would buy gems/jewelry as an investment.
Natural rare colored diamonds and quality untreated colored stones went up in value. A natural pearl necklace my mother purchased in 1990 for $2500 I just sold for $12000 at auction. Even if you paid double retail on gold if you held it long enough you’ve made money.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Very low resale value but if you don’t care about that buy them. Nobody will be able to tell visually. You need a tester to know the difference. If you want something investment worthy look for natural untreated colored stones with GIA or AGL certifications.
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Diamonds are not an investment. They do not appreciate and you will not get back anything near what you paid a jeweler.
All jewelry has a very low resale value. Only someone bad with money would buy gems/jewelry as an investment.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Lab or fake diamonds are marked and it's easy to tell because they have no imperfections so it's fake
So they’re too perfect? Make it make sense
Correct. Too perfect is a flaw in and of itself.
Diamonds are a *natural* phenomenon. Just because you can create a perfect carbon crystal in a laboratory doesn’t mean it’s a diamond.
A diamond was created by natural processes. Lab created carbon crystals were not. Just because they are chemically indistinguishable doesn’t matter, if the process they were created was different.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Lab or fake diamonds are marked and it's easy to tell because they have no imperfections so it's fake
So they’re too perfect? Make it make sense
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Like Blade Runner where real animals remained more valuable than synthetic copies, real mined diamonds are typically worth more than lab created diamonds because they are naturally formed, finite, and harder to replace. Even if they look similar, the market often places a premium on rarity, authenticity, and natural origin. Lab diamonds can offer great visual value, but real mined diamonds usually carry stronger prestige and long term perceived worth.
Looks like DeBeers got desperate enough to send a shill.
Anonymous wrote:Lab or fake diamonds are marked and it's easy to tell because they have no imperfections so it's fake
Anonymous wrote:Would you rather eat lab grown meat or free range. Cas closed