Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:When US attacks a foreign country, it's "liberation".

When a foreign country fights back, it "terrorism".

Cute but sloppy.

1. Terrorism by definition involves non-state actors (though a state can sponsor or support terrorism).

2. Terrorism also typically involves the deliberate targeting of non-military targets for the purpose of generating…terror.

3. If a state deliberately attacks civilians, that is a war crime, not terrorism.

Iran sponsors terrorists. Israel has committed war crimes.

The US is an aggressor, but we’ve not seen any evidence so far that it has either sponsored terror or committed war crimes (unless you believe that it intentionally targeted the school).

Anonymous wrote:Wonderful

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Were probably going to be in for decades of terrorism after this administration.

This. Trump and Vance stupidly cut State Department experts, USAID, and the agents monitoring Iranian threats, and installed a 22yo grocery store clerk as our primary anti-terrorism expert right before they started a massive ME war.

Dumb and dumber. IDK why the military aren’t leaving, especially as the drunkard doesn’t want them acknowledged in newspapers in the eve t they die for our country. Yes, they put us at risk, but they’re putting soldiers at an even graver risk with their incompetence and cruelty.

Anonymous wrote:Wonderful

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Wonderful

Thanks, Trump!

Not to worry! We have a 22 year old zero experience at the helm.

https://www.propublica.org/article/trump-dhs-thomas-fugate-cp3-terrorism-prevention

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Wonderful

Thanks, Trump!

Anonymous wrote:Wonderful

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I’m mostly concerned because the democrats refuse to fully fund Homeland Security. Really stupid.

We're safer without them. They shoot Americans. Why are you afraid of a terrorist attack but not that?

Really?
TSA? Coast Guard? Secret Service?
Those are the people working without pay because of the democrats.

They're working without pay because the American people's outrage about ICE has reached a tipping point, giving Democrats a negotiating position they didn't have before. Maybe Republicans should try negotiating with them.

We don’t negotiate with terrorists. Or people behaving like children throwing a temper tantrum.

Meanwhile, travelers have the democrats to thank for this:

Multiple security issues today with a couple of airports stopping flights. It has nothing to do with Congress. It has to do with a war this addle minded poopy smelling Taco -loving dog started.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:When US attacks a foreign country, it's "liberation".

When a foreign country fights back, it "terrorism".

Cute but sloppy.

1. Terrorism by definition involves non-state actors (though a state can sponsor or support terrorism).

2. Terrorism also typically involves the deliberate targeting of non-military targets for the purpose of generating…terror.

3. If a state deliberately attacks civilians, that is a war crime, not terrorism.

Iran sponsors terrorists. Israel has committed war crimes.

The US is an aggressor, but we’ve not seen any evidence so far that it has either sponsored terror or committed war crimes (unless you believe that it intentionally targeted the school).

Anonymous wrote:Honestly, this war is just giving Russia and other enemies more fodder to nuke us or a nearby ally. The sudden interest in buildup of nukes in Europe as defense is eye opening.

Anonymous wrote:When US attacks a foreign country, it's "liberation".

When a foreign country fights back, it "terrorism".

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I have no doubt a false flag attack courtesy of Israel and the US intelligence services is on the way. No point worrying about it. What disappoints me is how Americans fall for these schemes every time.

Considering most Americans including members of this forum are naive enough to fall for the government's narrative of 9/11, can you really blame Israel/US intelligence for doing so?

I think people are far less naive than they were in 2001.

LOL good one. People actually voted for Trump after watching J6 with their very own eyes and believed he would be way better than Kamala. We live among the most unintelligent and naive clowns ever.

Can we stop with this Harris nonsense? She was a terrible candidate along the lines of Sarah Palin. And then to add Walz to the ticket? If only the Democrats had put up some normal candidates, which would have happened if they had acted sooner and run a primary.

This is neither here nor there post inauguration, however. This sh!t show could not have been predicted. Although since we're dealing with a bunch of low self esteem white men, I guess anything under the sun is possible.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I’m mostly concerned because the democrats refuse to fully fund Homeland Security. Really stupid.

We're safer without them. They shoot Americans. Why are you afraid of a terrorist attack but not that?

Really?
TSA? Coast Guard? Secret Service?
Those are the people working without pay because of the democrats.

They're working without pay because the American people's outrage about ICE has reached a tipping point, giving Democrats a negotiating position they didn't have before. Maybe Republicans should try negotiating with them.

We don’t negotiate with terrorists. Or people behaving like children throwing a temper tantrum.

Meanwhile, travelers have the democrats to thank for this:

LOL. Let’s put this in perspective, Trump and Vance left Americans stranded in the ME during a war of their own making, while the Brits and other countries made getting their citizens out a priority.

I’d rather see Americans in line, than dead because if ICE or this administration.