Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Younger women often have one or more cats. These creatures exert a subtle mind control over the weakest-minded causing them to forsake common sense, wisdom, and sound judgement; hence, these weak-minded, wishy-washy women swallow socialist slogans designed to evoke feelings, not critical thinking.
The cats are controlling the women’s??? What about the women with dogs?
Weak-minded young women with dogs are similar to the ones with cats but expect pats on the head, goodies, hand-outs and treats from the government just because these women think they are cute. I’m not even going to discuss the sordid life of young women with goldfish or other pets.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Younger women often have one or more cats. These creatures exert a subtle mind control over the weakest-minded causing them to forsake common sense, wisdom, and sound judgement; hence, these weak-minded, wishy-washy women swallow socialist slogans designed to evoke feelings, not critical thinking.
The cats are controlling the women??? What about the women with dogs?
Anonymous wrote:Younger women often have one or more cats. These creatures exert a subtle mind control over the weakest-minded causing them to forsake common sense, wisdom, and sound judgement; hence, these weak-minded, wishy-washy women swallow socialist slogans designed to evoke feelings, not critical thinking.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:A confluence of irreligiousity and increased rates of childlessness.
Historically men have been more left wing than women.
Without children to care for, young women transfer their maternal feelings and desire to care to other so-called vulnerable groups outside of their family: LBGT, immigrants, the “oppressed”.
Without religion in their life, young women (and many people of both sexes and all ages) seek feelings of identity and belonging in the political in-groups.
So by this logic, this liberal married mom should not care about vulnerable groups outside my family. Yet somehow I still do.
Gonna say your logic here is not on the mark
Do you attend religious services regularly?
So being filled with God's love and following Jesus' teaching makes one less likely to care about vulnerable populations? Hm.
The loss of religiosity has pushed people to be more emotionally attached to their political beliefs.
This is true for both sexes and both political parties.
Women are just more inclined to choose Democrats because they emphasize caring for the “oppressed” which a very feminine instinct; although statistically religious women of all races tend to be less Democratic leaning. Clearly they do exist however as the PP opined.
Kindly shut up
Oooh someone’s triggered.
No intelligent people just think you are a moron.
Being intelligent is like being rich - only the fakers announce their status.
that's how I feel about "Christians" these days
And Jews and Muslims too. All fake
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:A confluence of irreligiousity and increased rates of childlessness.
Historically men have been more left wing than women.
Without children to care for, young women transfer their maternal feelings and desire to care to other so-called vulnerable groups outside of their family: LBGT, immigrants, the “oppressed”.
Without religion in their life, young women (and many people of both sexes and all ages) seek feelings of identity and belonging in the political in-groups.
Came here to say that. There's something to it!
Look at Christianity, whole theme of sex abuse and cover up. Just recently, a whole new exposure of abuse in the Assemblies of God church published a couple months ago, similar to that of the Catholic church. Some men with serious Christian beliefs seem prone to enjoy subjugating others. It is definitely repulsive.
Men in power have always sexually exploited the vulnerable.
What is rare is the social constraints where this behavior is widely condemned.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Roe V Wade was overturned. Enough said.
Imagine advocating to legally murder your child….
Lots of MAGAs are advocating for legally murdering their children by refusing vaccines and gun control and other things that save childrens' lives. Not much of a leg to stand on there.
Yes, declining the flu shot is the same thing as abortion. The science has spoken.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Roe V Wade was overturned. Enough said.
Imagine advocating to legally murder your child….
Lots of MAGAs are advocating for legally murdering their children by refusing vaccines and gun control and other things that save childrens' lives. Not much of a leg to stand on there.
Yes, declining the flu shot is the same thing as abortion. The science has spoken.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:A confluence of irreligiousity and increased rates of childlessness.
Historically men have been more left wing than women.
Without children to care for, young women transfer their maternal feelings and desire to care to other so-called vulnerable groups outside of their family: LBGT, immigrants, the “oppressed”.
Without religion in their life, young women (and many people of both sexes and all ages) seek feelings of identity and belonging in the political in-groups.
Came here to say that. There's something to it!
Look at Christianity, whole theme of sex abuse and cover up. Just recently, a whole new exposure of abuse in the Assemblies of God church published a couple months ago, similar to that of the Catholic church. Some men with serious Christian beliefs seem prone to enjoy subjugating others. It is definitely repulsive.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Roe V Wade was overturned. Enough said.
Imagine advocating to legally murder your child….
Lots of MAGAs are advocating for legally murdering their children by refusing vaccines and gun control and other things that save childrens' lives. Not much of a leg to stand on there.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:A confluence of irreligiousity and increased rates of childlessness.
Historically men have been more left wing than women.
Without children to care for, young women transfer their maternal feelings and desire to care to other so-called vulnerable groups outside of their family: LBGT, immigrants, the “oppressed”.
Without religion in their life, young women (and many people of both sexes and all ages) seek feelings of identity and belonging in the political in-groups.
So by this logic, this liberal married mom should not care about vulnerable groups outside my family. Yet somehow I still do.
Gonna say your logic here is not on the mark
Do you attend religious services regularly?
So being filled with God's love and following Jesus' teaching makes one less likely to care about vulnerable populations? Hm.
The loss of religiosity has pushed people to be more emotionally attached to their political beliefs.
This is true for both sexes and both political parties.
Women are just more inclined to choose Democrats because they emphasize caring for the “oppressed” which a very feminine instinct; although statistically religious women of all races tend to be less Democratic leaning. Clearly they do exist however as the PP opined.
Kindly shut up
Oooh someone’s triggered.
No intelligent people just think you are a moron.
Being intelligent is like being rich - only the fakers announce their status.
that's how I feel about "Christians" these days
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:A confluence of irreligiousity and increased rates of childlessness.
Historically men have been more left wing than women.
Without children to care for, young women transfer their maternal feelings and desire to care to other so-called vulnerable groups outside of their family: LBGT, immigrants, the “oppressed”.
Without religion in their life, young women (and many people of both sexes and all ages) seek feelings of identity and belonging in the political in-groups.
Came here to say that. There's something to it!
Anonymous wrote:Of course young women are radicalized - all around them they see their peers being sexually harassed, raped and murdered by men who far too often get away with it. And now that they are drawing closer to education and pay parity with men, they see this disgusting wave of fanatical misogyny unfolding in the online space where men whine about being held accountable and not having entitlement to women’s bodies in all imaginable ways.