Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Because nobody wants to be a teacher.

Your job will be replaced by AI in the next 5 years.

Imagine each child has individual instruction via AI instead of a single person trying to teach a subject to the entire class. Kids will get a custom tailored 1:1 experience.

How’s AI going to handle the kid who comes to school with a fever, crying at his desk? How about the two kids picking on each other? What about the kid who refuses to do the assignment? I’m curious how AI will handle the three kids who refuse to stop talking so the remainder of the class can focus. Oops! And now a chair was thrown across the room.

Content delivery is just one part of teaching. Managing children is much harder, and AI can’t do it.

I actually think once robotics advances it will be able to handle this. The main hang up with robotics now (lack of dexterity) shouldn't really be an issue with teaching except maybe for really little kids.

You are joking, right?

You can't possibly be this clueless with so little understanding of childhood development or human nature.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Because nobody wants to be a teacher.

Your job will be replaced by AI in the next 5 years.

Imagine each child has individual instruction via AI instead of a single person trying to teach a subject to the entire class. Kids will get a custom tailored 1:1 experience.

How’s AI going to handle the kid who comes to school with a fever, crying at his desk? How about the two kids picking on each other? What about the kid who refuses to do the assignment? I’m curious how AI will handle the three kids who refuse to stop talking so the remainder of the class can focus. Oops! And now a chair was thrown across the room.

Content delivery is just one part of teaching. Managing children is much harder, and AI can’t do it.

We’re not talking about kindergarten. But to answer your question this is what the adult humans will be focusing on rather than “teaching”.


The academic outcomes will be incredible.

Bwahahahahahaha.

Never met a kid, huh.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Because nobody wants to be a teacher.

Your job will be replaced by AI in the next 5 years.

Imagine each child has individual instruction via AI instead of a single person trying to teach a subject to the entire class. Kids will get a custom tailored 1:1 experience.

Dude, you are forgetting the COVID experience and how horrible tech is for kids. If you want your kid raised by a robot, feel free to experiment on them. No one else does. We have seen what happens to kids when they are taught by computers. It isn’t pretty.

He doesn't have kids, and he is a computer guy who just sits in front of a screen so he knows zero about children, childhood development and how kids learn.

His arguments could not be more faulty and ill informed.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Every cop you pass is safe. People need to think differently when they talk to their children about future employment.

Not true. AI can do most of the office processing work, so less cops will be needed overall. AI has been doing speed tickets and traffic violations for some time. It will be able to do more.

We got a sneak peek at UBI during COVID when almost everyone stayed home and received checks from the government.

What? That didn't happen. The majority of people neither stayed home nor received checks.

When AI drives unemployment to previously unimaginable levels there will be a much greater need for law enforcement. It’ll be great if AI can do paperwork so police can spend more time on the street dealing with the civil unrest, theft and violent crime that will eventually rear its ugly head.

This is ultimately who the AI fantasy is for and by - people who really want, for some reason, to live in futuristic dystopian police state. They are so excited for it, you can't even tell them it's not very probable.

Imagine thinking it's good to sink billions of dollars into a product that destroys the earth, that doesn't even deliver what it promises, and if it did deliver what it promised, would lead to mass unemployment and - again, this is your fantasy not my prediction - everyone hating its creators to the point of violent unrest. Is this a kink of some kind? It's not a normal thing to want.

I'm a teacher, and I'm sure we won't be replaced by robots anytime soon, but we will be reduced to simple monitors of classrooms where kids sit and stare at a screen. It won't be any kind of good education, but no one cares about that anyway. It will be cheaper, and that's what will end up mattering.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Wow some.of the responses here have gotten me even more scared. I'm glad a lot of you feel that you add unique value that can't be replaced with AI. I am afraid you are simply in denial.

Can you kindly shut the hell up. These threads, and the people who start them, are morons. People offer thoughtful suggestions (“I’m a teacher so doubtful” or “Maybe AI could do ABC part of my job but not XYZ”) and your annoying a$$ comes back with “BUT ACKSHUALLY…”

They just want to pad their stocks in AI companies. Most of them probably don’t even believe half this sh!t.

Anonymous wrote:Wow some.of the responses here have gotten me even more scared. I'm glad a lot of you feel that you add unique value that can't be replaced with AI. I am afraid you are simply in denial.

Can you kindly shut the hell up. These threads, and the people who start them, are morons. People offer thoughtful suggestions (“I’m a teacher so doubtful” or “Maybe AI could do ABC part of my job but not XYZ”) and your annoying a$$ comes back with “BUT ACKSHUALLY…”

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Every cop you pass is safe. People need to think differently when they talk to their children about future employment.

Haha, no. Only personal protection for oligarchs will be safe, and maybe soldiers. Municipal police will HAVE NO MONEY. All of these jobs that’s people advocate, like hvac and police, depend upon a productive class earning profits that scale and flow down to the rest of society. Well they are shrinking that population and keeping more profits, so good luck to the rest of us.

Maybe the population shrinking is a good thing, no idea why the right is trying to spur more babies

Keep thinking this way. You’ll set your kid up to be replaced by AI. Great parenting. Cops, firefighters, paramedics, they’ll all be working and getting paid while accountants, coders, engineers, and most other white collar workers will be visiting food pantries. It’s horrible, but inevitable.

I like the oligarch security angle though. SWAT officers and U.S. Special Forces vets could make a lot of money in that line of work.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Because nobody wants to be a teacher.

Your job will be replaced by AI in the next 5 years.

Imagine each child has individual instruction via AI instead of a single person trying to teach a subject to the entire class. Kids will get a custom tailored 1:1 experience.

How’s AI going to handle the kid who comes to school with a fever, crying at his desk? How about the two kids picking on each other? What about the kid who refuses to do the assignment? I’m curious how AI will handle the three kids who refuse to stop talking so the remainder of the class can focus. Oops! And now a chair was thrown across the room.

Content delivery is just one part of teaching. Managing children is much harder, and AI can’t do it.

I actually think once robotics advances it will be able to handle this. The main hang up with robotics now (lack of dexterity) shouldn't really be an issue with teaching except maybe for really little kids.

Even the most optimistic folks thinks a robot like Optimus is at least 30 years away from performing overall useful functions (sooner for very targeted, limited ones).

I actually don't imagine any situation where there isn't a human in each classroom doing something. The question is whether they will need to be a certified teacher vs. just an adult overseeing discipline while kids are taught with AI.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Because nobody wants to be a teacher.

Your job will be replaced by AI in the next 5 years.

Imagine each child has individual instruction via AI instead of a single person trying to teach a subject to the entire class. Kids will get a custom tailored 1:1 experience.

How’s AI going to handle the kid who comes to school with a fever, crying at his desk? How about the two kids picking on each other? What about the kid who refuses to do the assignment? I’m curious how AI will handle the three kids who refuse to stop talking so the remainder of the class can focus. Oops! And now a chair was thrown across the room.

Content delivery is just one part of teaching. Managing children is much harder, and AI can’t do it.

I actually think once robotics advances it will be able to handle this. The main hang up with robotics now (lack of dexterity) shouldn't really be an issue with teaching except maybe for really little kids.

In the future AI will do everything and all the humans will have jobs trying to mop up the flood of AI slop that drowns us.

AI won't replace us. AI will destroy us and then die.

Anonymous wrote:I just used AI to prep for job interviews and tripled my salary. It's not all doom and gloom.

Someone else lost that job. Doom and gloom.

Next time everyone uses AI, same result, plus a bunch of wasted money and energy.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Because nobody wants to be a teacher.

Your job will be replaced by AI in the next 5 years.

Imagine each child has individual instruction via AI instead of a single person trying to teach a subject to the entire class. Kids will get a custom tailored 1:1 experience.

How’s AI going to handle the kid who comes to school with a fever, crying at his desk? How about the two kids picking on each other? What about the kid who refuses to do the assignment? I’m curious how AI will handle the three kids who refuse to stop talking so the remainder of the class can focus. Oops! And now a chair was thrown across the room.

Content delivery is just one part of teaching. Managing children is much harder, and AI can’t do it.

We’re not talking about kindergarten. But to answer your question this is what the adult humans will be focusing on rather than “teaching”.


The academic outcomes will be incredible.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:AI can’t do anything correctly. If you’re using AI at your job, it means you suck at your job.

My friend is a software developer. Every single new piece of code must be AI generated at his company. They are no longer allowed to write code themselves. And if they claim AI can't write the code, they need to write full report explaining why.

And they are required to use AI to write the report, or write fully report explaining why!

Anonymous wrote:Every cop you pass is safe. People need to think differently when they talk to their children about future employment.

Haha, no. Only personal protection for oligarchs will be safe, and maybe soldiers. Municipal police will HAVE NO MONEY. All of these jobs that’s people advocate, like hvac and police, depend upon a productive class earning profits that scale and flow down to the rest of society. Well they are shrinking that population and keeping more profits, so good luck to the rest of us.

Maybe the population shrinking is a good thing, no idea why the right is trying to spur more babies