Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Most people in this thread are either trolls or idiots. There are clear statistics on crime. But just look at the last week. Charlie Kirk was predominantly followed by white men. But there has been no rioting, no fighting.

I honestly don’t see anyone getting angry in public. Maybe a few crazy airport clips, but they are rarely while men.

WTF are YOU talking about?!?!?!

There has been an EXPLOSION of rightwing violence since Kirk died! Are you serious?? You don’t think anything has happened???? Really???????

Link?

Watch any news source other than fox or other rightwing media. It’s all over the place. Theres been shootings, arson, bombings - all over Kirk.

Look for yourself. I’m not going to spoon feed you links.

I don’t watch Fox. I did Google it.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I was in Europe for two weeks. Noticeably lacking white male rage and misogyny. No one was driving a big truck to compensate, gay guys walking around holding hands, effeminate men just being themselves. It was liberating and fresh.
What are they doing right that we aren’t?

Wow. You really don't know anything about Europe (hint: read up on the French protests and the bubbling populist movements in multiple countries and the voter anger over migration).

Silly topic and silly thread. If we want to play this game, I'll put it out there: there is no group as angry and vengeful as as women, especially progressive left wing women who claim the mantle of "kindness" while hating and shunning anyone who disagrees with their ideologies.

They are trying to be kind to themselves and protect their rights. If you are against womens rights, you should be shunned.

Anonymous wrote:Because we have reached a point in time where it is abundantly clear that, but for size and physical strength, women are by far the superior gender in every possible way. And they can’t handle that.

Unless you find a snake or a spider.

Anonymous wrote:Because we have reached a point in time where it is abundantly clear that, but for size and physical strength, women are by far the superior gender in every possible way. And they can’t handle that.

I think it's true. It's why men have always tried to suppress and control women. If you force women to be breeders and free domestic servants with less rights in society it gives men a leg up. If you force women to cover their heads and bodies and faces it restricts them even more. If you take away womens ability to control how many children she carries, you knee cap her independence and freedom.

Because we have reached a point in time where it is abundantly clear that, but for size and physical strength, women are by far the superior gender in every possible way. And they can’t handle that.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Because women are finding out they don't need men for anything and certainly aren't going to settle for crap men, so they are lonely.

Parents need to teach their sons to raise the bar, and take rejection gracefully.

Or simply selectively terminate most male embryos, which is a LOT easier than spending 20-some years raising a human being who despite your best efforts is still statistically probable of becoming a mass shooter.

Let’s be blunt about it: the human species would carry on just fine with 90% fewer males, and would be healthier as recessive genes and violent tendencies would be removed from the gene pool. Nature tends to do this with animals, as many males are killed in competition for breeding, ensuring that only the strongest males pass on their genes. Humanity could do the same for the traits most desirable in society, by ensuring that only males with desired traits are born.

Therefore, came the gay men?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This isn’t a “men” thing. This is a white men thing. Let’s be clear about that.

Nah, it's definitely a man thing, but it might be a poor/ uneducated man thing. I live in a very diverse neighborhood and the white men are all walking doodle dogs and wearing babies. I've seen some violence but it's always been men of color, because that's who's poor/ uneducated where I live. If I lived in Appalachia, it would be a totally different story.

Verbal abuse, neglect, financial abuse, lying, goes across all SES.

Anonymous wrote:Men have always been angry, but now they get fewer passes for it, and have to bring more to the table to even land a woman in the first place.

If you are a MC woman, how many of your girlfriends have abusive male partners? I don't mean grumpy or passive aggressive... I mean "she has to wear sunglasses and joke about how clumsy she is at least once a month." Very few, right? I don't have a single female friend who is in a physically abusive relationship.

Whereas in my grandmother's era, it was common. Husband would go to his 9-5, get shat upon by his boss, swing by the bar, come home and take it out on the wife.

I agree that teaching boys to deal with their naturally occurring aggression, and to be able to process their emotions in a healthy way, should job #1 for parents.

I have many in verbally abusive and emotionally abusive marriages. The topic of the Op- anger outbursts, inability to communicated don’t want to hear concerns about anything in the household or family, yelling, temper tantrums, gaslighting, stonewalling.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I was in Europe for two weeks. Noticeably lacking white male rage and misogyny. No one was driving a big truck to compensate, gay guys walking around holding hands, effeminate men just being themselves. It was liberating and fresh.
What are they doing right that we aren’t?

Were you in a city or out in the countryside?

Both.

Anonymous wrote:I work in a job where we have tons of interactions with our employees, in my 16 years career I have only come across 3-4 men who were difficult to deal with or had any anger issues. OTOH, my worst experiences have been with women in terms of sheer number (at least 20 times that of men) and anger scale, there is simply no comparison. I say this as a woman who is very neutral and generally patient, obviously ymmv.

What pile of sexist shit. I remember working on a tech project for the most openly sexist moron of a male manager. The team was composed of 5 women some of whom didn’t like one another and one was technically weak. Our ass of a manager made constant comments about how we couldn’t get along and how horrible it was to manage us. We got along, didn’t fight and brought the project in on time meeting the deadlines. That never happened where I worked. We got no recognition for that and he told every other manager we were nightmare to work with.

In my tech career I was usually the only woman on the team. We always had weird guys who had anger issues. Always. Twice they fired guys who were fired for being inappropriate and threatening. A couple of us had to leave early and lock our doors because of a male nut job. I knew one woman in my long career who had a mental breakdown and she didn’t threaten anyone.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Most people in this thread are either trolls or idiots. There are clear statistics on crime. But just look at the last week. Charlie Kirk was predominantly followed by white men. But there has been no rioting, no fighting.

I honestly don’t see anyone getting angry in public. Maybe a few crazy airport clips, but they are rarely while men.

WTF are YOU talking about?!?!?!

There has been an EXPLOSION of rightwing violence since Kirk died! Are you serious?? You don’t think anything has happened???? Really???????

Link?

Watch any news source other than fox or other rightwing media. It’s all over the place. Theres been shootings, arson, bombings - all over Kirk.

Look for yourself. I’m not going to spoon feed you links.

It’s so pervasive and obvious you have to find obscure links to it to even know about it.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This isn’t a “men” thing. This is a white men thing. Let’s be clear about that.

Nah, it's definitely a man thing, but it might be a poor/ uneducated man thing. I live in a very diverse neighborhood and the white men are all walking doodle dogs and wearing babies. I've seen some violence but it's always been men of color, because that's who's poor/ uneducated where I live. If I lived in Appalachia, it would be a totally different story.

Those white men walking doodles and wearing babies are the white men that shoot up schools, churches, and gay nightclubs. Just because they’re walking a $2,000 designer dog or toting their kid around doesn’t mean they aren’t a sociopathic monster.

It does, actually. Another commonality among mass gun murderers is that they are SINGLE. Dude with a kid and a dog is socialized. Some might disparagingly say domesticated. Very, very rarely goes on a shooting spree.

Anonymous wrote:This isn’t a “men” thing. This is a white men thing. Let’s be clear about that.

Lets be clear you are a disgusting racist.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This isn’t a “men” thing. This is a white men thing. Let’s be clear about that.

Nah, it's definitely a man thing, but it might be a poor/ uneducated man thing. I live in a very diverse neighborhood and the white men are all walking doodle dogs and wearing babies. I've seen some violence but it's always been men of color, because that's who's poor/ uneducated where I live. If I lived in Appalachia, it would be a totally different story.

Those white men walking doodles and wearing babies are the white men that shoot up schools, churches, and gay nightclubs. Just because they’re walking a $2,000 designer dog or toting their kid around doesn’t mean they aren’t a sociopathic monster.

As for women "playing" the victim game... uh yeah, are you new here?? Women have always been victims of men. Literally always, since we crawled out of the caves. And now you're mad we're pushing back and declining to be victimized? That is quite a take.