Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:NVSL leaderboard means nothing, especially ages 13+. Two things. First, top tier swimmers are only swimming a couple of summer meets per season due to club meets. Two, division 1 swimmers are suited for every meet, and lower division teams are not.
You actually have no idea what you are talking about
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:NVSL leaderboard means nothing, especially ages 13+. Two things. First, top tier swimmers are only swimming a couple of summer meets per season due to club meets. Two, division 1 swimmers are suited for every meet, and lower division teams are not.
My kid is D1 and neither of your comments are true. Can you enlighten us a little more about stuff you know nothing about?
Anonymous wrote:NVSL leaderboard means nothing, especially ages 13+. Two things. First, top tier swimmers are only swimming a couple of summer meets per season due to club meets. Two, division 1 swimmers are suited for every meet, and lower division teams are not.
Anonymous wrote:NVSL leaderboard means nothing, especially ages 13+. Two things. First, top tier swimmers are only swimming a couple of summer meets per season due to club meets. Two, division 1 swimmers are suited for every meet, and lower division teams are not.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:D1 teams have average swimmers; they just have more average swimmers than the other divisions so they're aren't any gaps within age groups.
They have more depth so they can field more competitive relay teams.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:How did the relay carnival go in your division tonight?
Good but now we have the long wait to find out who is going to All Stars because we can’t move into this century and do things easier/smarter.
Yes, but you’re merging results from 17 discrete meets. I’m not saying you couldn’t automate that part, but it’s a little more complicated than folks are suggesting. Also, the reps do NOT attend that meeting, just the DCs.
Our first time. When will the results be announced?
I’m assuming they didn’t meet last night so it won’t be until after they meet in person this evening. Gotta love living in 1956.
Why the rush?
Have you never been a kid waiting excitedly for something? Especially bc the rest of the swimming world operates with real-time results.
Except that all the time cards are hand written and results are all manually entered, which results in mistakes that are found and need to be corrected.
Wouldn’t this be the case at any Saturday meet though?
Yes, but you’re merging results from 17 discrete meets. I’m not saying it couldn’t be automated, but it’s a little more complicated than folks are suggesting. Also, reps do NOT attend the seeding meeting, only the DCs.
And Swimtopia doesn’t do this automagically?
Anonymous wrote:Excellent is a stretch. There are better swimmers in the "lower" divisions.
Anonymous wrote:Excellent is a stretch. There are better swimmers in the "lower" divisions.
Anonymous wrote:D1 teams have average swimmers; they just have more average swimmers than the other divisions so they're aren't any gaps within age groups.