Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Not everything would sink. Seat cushions float, plastics from/in the plane, small luggage, shoes, clothing, blankets,/pillows....None of this was ever found.
Over 200 pieces were found in Mozambique and Madagascar beaches …
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It couldn’t be more clear that it was the pilot, who had simulated and deleted a nearly identical route. What a tragedy. Hopefully airlines have put safeguards in place to prevent it from happening again
Right, but what could those be? There haven't been any terrorist murder/suicides by airplane since 9/11 because we have been able to shore up weaknesses. But unfortunately there have been pilot murder/suicides since MH370.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Germanwings_Flight_9525
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/China_Eastern_Airlines_Flight_5735
How do you enable to crew to have some kind of defense and override for a suicidal pilot that doesn't impact the security of the cockpit?
Right. There is not actual way to prevent these cases. The poster who ended with that "wish" was not thinking it through.
Just a classic "thoughts and prayers" signoff.
Anonymous wrote:Not everything would sink. Seat cushions float, plastics from/in the plane, small luggage, shoes, clothing, blankets,/pillows....None of this was ever found.
Anonymous wrote:Not everything would sink. Seat cushions float, plastics from/in the plane, small luggage, shoes, clothing, blankets,/pillows....None of this was ever found.
Anonymous wrote:There would be debris not matter what happened to the plane. Where is the debris?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:According to Netflix, the pilot was doing home flight simulations of this exact scenario, flying off course, and running out of fuel over the SCS. They didn't spend a lot of time on it, but seems like there's the story right there.
This isn't what the Netflix doc says. It is neither the exact scenario in terms of route nor was it a continuous flight that was simulated. The doc explains why it wasn't identical.
I don't know what happened and don't have a favored theory but the simulator data doesn't seem to be at all relevant. Rather it seems like those who favor "the pilot did it" theory have manipulated the interpretation of the simulator data to be helpful to that narrative but it doesn't really fit.
It was very, very close path but slightly more east on the graphic they showed it. Pretty crazy.
I mean, it wasn't an EXACT match but extremely close!
This article has an image of the simulator route (in red) and where the satellite pings indicate the plane went. Why on earth would a pilot fly a simulated route like this? You'd never actually fly one unless you were trying to crash the plane into the ocean. And this route was the only one on the simulator that he flew manually, apparently.
To believe that the pilot did NOT do this, IMO, requires belief that the simulator route was planted and is a fake.
https://nymag.com/intelligencer/2016/07/mh370-pilot-flew-suicide-route-on-home-simulator.html
If the pilot did this, why did nobody text or call a loved one? If he did this, he would have been back over Malaysian land (according to that theory he turned around) and the people in the cockpit would have had 15 minutes of air, so why wouldn't they call? Also, was his rapid decent to knock everyone out planned on the simulator.
I still think there are lots of unanswered questions to believe this theory. Also, as I said upthread it would be a total outlier in pilot suicides. To fly until he ran out of gas to be able to plunge it into the ocean. Sitting for 7 hours with a dead cabin, pissing himself. That's a loooong time to execute a suicide mission.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:According to Netflix, the pilot was doing home flight simulations of this exact scenario, flying off course, and running out of fuel over the SCS. They didn't spend a lot of time on it, but seems like there's the story right there.
This isn't what the Netflix doc says. It is neither the exact scenario in terms of route nor was it a continuous flight that was simulated. The doc explains why it wasn't identical.
I don't know what happened and don't have a favored theory but the simulator data doesn't seem to be at all relevant. Rather it seems like those who favor "the pilot did it" theory have manipulated the interpretation of the simulator data to be helpful to that narrative but it doesn't really fit.
It was very, very close path but slightly more east on the graphic they showed it. Pretty crazy.
I mean, it wasn't an EXACT match but extremely close!
This article has an image of the simulator route (in red) and where the satellite pings indicate the plane went. Why on earth would a pilot fly a simulated route like this? You'd never actually fly one unless you were trying to crash the plane into the ocean. And this route was the only one on the simulator that he flew manually, apparently.
To believe that the pilot did NOT do this, IMO, requires belief that the simulator route was planted and is a fake.
https://nymag.com/intelligencer/2016/07/mh370-pilot-flew-suicide-route-on-home-simulator.html
If the pilot did this, why did nobody text or call a loved one? If he did this, he would have been back over Malaysian land (according to that theory he turned around) and the people in the cockpit would have had 15 minutes of air, so why wouldn't they call? Also, was his rapid decent to knock everyone out planned on the simulator.
I still think there are lots of unanswered questions to believe this theory. Also, as I said upthread it would be a total outlier in pilot suicides. To fly until he ran out of gas to be able to plunge it into the ocean. Sitting for 7 hours with a dead cabin, pissing himself. That's a loooong time to execute a suicide mission.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:According to Netflix, the pilot was doing home flight simulations of this exact scenario, flying off course, and running out of fuel over the SCS. They didn't spend a lot of time on it, but seems like there's the story right there.
This isn't what the Netflix doc says. It is neither the exact scenario in terms of route nor was it a continuous flight that was simulated. The doc explains why it wasn't identical.
I don't know what happened and don't have a favored theory but the simulator data doesn't seem to be at all relevant. Rather it seems like those who favor "the pilot did it" theory have manipulated the interpretation of the simulator data to be helpful to that narrative but it doesn't really fit.
It was very, very close path but slightly more east on the graphic they showed it. Pretty crazy.
I mean, it wasn't an EXACT match but extremely close!
This article has an image of the simulator route (in red) and where the satellite pings indicate the plane went. Why on earth would a pilot fly a simulated route like this? You'd never actually fly one unless you were trying to crash the plane into the ocean. And this route was the only one on the simulator that he flew manually, apparently.
To believe that the pilot did NOT do this, IMO, requires belief that the simulator route was planted and is a fake.
https://nymag.com/intelligencer/2016/07/mh370-pilot-flew-suicide-route-on-home-simulator.html
Anonymous wrote:I guess my problem with every scenario is I don’t know whom to trust. I’m not usually a conspiracy theorist. But we can’t know if the reported flight simulation was real. If the Inmarsat data was real. What about the debris identified by one of the participants in the documentary? Cyndi Hendrey.