Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The field hockey and lacrosse teams are no different.
Incredibly different. Where I live, there have been field hockey and lacrosse teams, for generations, in school districts at all income levels.
This is not even close to the same thing as an individual, niche sport, often played outside of school and favored by well to do families.
I was talking about at the college level, and where I live they’re rich kid sports.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The field hockey and lacrosse teams are no different.
Incredibly different. Where I live, there have been field hockey and lacrosse teams, for generations, in school districts at all income levels.
This is not even close to the same thing as an individual, niche sport, often played outside of school and favored by well to do families.
Anonymous wrote:The field hockey and lacrosse teams are no different.
Anonymous wrote:The field hockey and lacrosse teams are no different.
Anonymous wrote:Article about niche sports for the UMC, and describes the squash scene in CT.
https://cdn.theatlantic.com/assets/media/files/20201101_nichesports.pdf
Anonymous wrote:Absolutely not! Lots of kids from all socioeconomic levels play squash. In Baltimore there is a squash program geared towards lower socioeconomic kids.
Anonymous wrote:Absolutely not! Lots of kids from all socioeconomic levels play squash. In Baltimore there is a squash program geared towards lower socioeconomic kids.