Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:A lot of rentals. Low condo fees.
DC condo assn't treasurer here. 20-unit building. We had low fees because owners voted and decided we'd rather handle larger projects through special assessments, instead of building huge reserves.
That's not the case at all associations, but be careful about making assumptions that low condo fees = bad management.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Read the meeting minutes from the last two years of condo board meetings. You can request them.
Only way to do this is to put an offer on a property. You can't just willy-nilly request them and expect management to provide them to you otherwise.
Anonymous wrote:A lot of rentals. Low condo fees.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:A lot of rentals. Low condo fees.
I wouldn't say "a lot of rentals" is a red flag at all. Low condo fees I agree with.
OP here: why low fees is a red flag? for such small condo associations tthe expenses are small- no gyms/pools/gardens/ etc, no staff on call ...I would say the opposite if the condo fees are large- where the money are going to?
Anonymous wrote:Have owned two different condos and have many friends who have owned condos as well.
Red flags:
Self-managed
Fees too low
Special assessments (indicates fees may have been too low to cover upkeep, poorly managed, or similar)
Also, look at upkeep of the building. Clean? Well maintained? Not a guarantee there’s nothing wrong if it’s clean, but can be a red flag of other deferred maintenance if you see obvious signs of wear and tear or neglect in the common areas.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:A lot of rentals. Low condo fees.
I wouldn't say "a lot of rentals" is a red flag at all. Low condo fees I agree with.
Anonymous wrote:Read the meeting minutes from the last two years of condo board meetings. You can request them.
Anonymous wrote:A lot of rentals. Low condo fees.
Anonymous wrote:Talk to owners