Anonymous wrote:" NO ONE (at least not on DCUM) has access to objective information that tells us which school teaches better. "
Agree. The longer I have been visiting DCUM, the more concerned I have become that there is simply too much hype about Sidwell (of course, it is a great school, but why so much hype about it?) and too many condescending remarks about other schools -- even though some of those schools (including Landon) may do as good a job on the academic front as Sidwell.
Objective information about how the schools teach and how they support/empower students to achieve academic excellence would be truly helpful to dispell superficial judgements and hype.
In the end, much depends on the teachers. Are we able to compare the teachers (expertise, experience, attitudes, background, etc) of, say, Sidwell and Landon???
" NO ONE (at least not on DCUM) has access to objective information that tells us which school teaches better. "
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The schools are so completely different...there's not much to compare. Sidwell does better with college admissions. It is considered more elite by any of the available standards. If you live in DC -- send your kid to Sidwell. If your kid is a great athlete and a "Boy's boy" send him to Landon. It's not that Landon is bad -- it's fine. It's just not known as the stellar educational elite center that Sidwell is.
Woaa. Sidwell may get good college admissions because of the students that enter. NO ONE (at least not on DCUM) has access to objective information that tells us which school teaches better.
Anonymous wrote:The schools are so completely different...there's not much to compare. Sidwell does better with college admissions. It is considered more elite by any of the available standards. If you live in DC -- send your kid to Sidwell. If your kid is a great athlete and a "Boy's boy" send him to Landon. It's not that Landon is bad -- it's fine. It's just not known as the stellar educational elite center that Sidwell is.