Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Will the at-risk preference go before or after the sibling preference. Aside from expansion years, they completely fill the pre-k3 class with siblings (and teachers' kids I guess), so this seems mostly lip service unless they're willing to wait list siblings in the future.
My hope would be that it would go
At risk with sibling
At risk without sibling
Not at risk with sibling
Not at risk without sibling
Because having siblings together is important, and probably especially so for at risk families that are less likely to have cars and flexible work schedules.
Anonymous wrote:Will the at-risk preference go before or after the sibling preference. Aside from expansion years, they completely fill the pre-k3 class with siblings (and teachers' kids I guess), so this seems mostly lip service unless they're willing to wait list siblings in the future.
Anonymous wrote:Will the at-risk preference go before or after the sibling preference. Aside from expansion years, they completely fill the pre-k3 class with siblings (and teachers' kids I guess), so this seems mostly lip service unless they're willing to wait list siblings in the future.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Latin
Ooh. That's a twist.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:How does an in-demand school like DCB then ensure it has a diversity of kids from across the economic spectrum? I can't imagine they want to serve only disadvantaged kids -- as they say kids do better in racially and economically integrated schools. Is there a % set aside?
I doubt DCB gets so many at-risk applicants that there is a chance of filling the whole school with them.
Anonymous wrote:How does an in-demand school like DCB then ensure it has a diversity of kids from across the economic spectrum? I can't imagine they want to serve only disadvantaged kids -- as they say kids do better in racially and economically integrated schools. Is there a % set aside?
Anonymous wrote:Latin