Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:At Oakridge the kids definitely had snack time. Sometimes lunch was at 11 in the morning (that was kindergarten I think) so i don’t see how other schools could decide not to have snacks! Those poor kids.
Please, with the drama. Your kid should be able to make it 4 hours without dying. This is a good experience for them to build up their stanima.
Or their stamina.
Would you want to eat breakfast at 8, eat again at 11, and not again until 4 or 4:30? Every day? Personally I would get hungry and it would be harder for me to focus and learn well. I think most five-year olds with this eating schedule get grumpy come 3PM, which is why a lot of schools have snack time, and for that I am grateful. I think there are better ways of building stamina than being hungry every day.
Hey, no need to convince me. I was just correcting the other poster’s misspelling of the word. I agree with you. A bag of goldfish helped my kid in APS K. We bailed on the school system for other reasons, but K was good.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:At Oakridge the kids definitely had snack time. Sometimes lunch was at 11 in the morning (that was kindergarten I think) so i don’t see how other schools could decide not to have snacks! Those poor kids.
Please, with the drama. Your kid should be able to make it 4 hours without dying. This is a good experience for them to build up their stanima.
Or their stamina.
Would you want to eat breakfast at 8, eat again at 11, and not again until 4 or 4:30? Every day? Personally I would get hungry and it would be harder for me to focus and learn well. I think most five-year olds with this eating schedule get grumpy come 3PM, which is why a lot of schools have snack time, and for that I am grateful. I think there are better ways of building stamina than being hungry every day.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:At Oakridge the kids definitely had snack time. Sometimes lunch was at 11 in the morning (that was kindergarten I think) so i don’t see how other schools could decide not to have snacks! Those poor kids.
Please, with the drama. Your kid should be able to make it 4 hours without dying. This is a good experience for them to build up their stanima.
Or their stamina.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:At Oakridge the kids definitely had snack time. Sometimes lunch was at 11 in the morning (that was kindergarten I think) so i don’t see how other schools could decide not to have snacks! Those poor kids.
Please, with the drama. Your kid should be able to make it 4 hours without dying. This is a good experience for them to build up their stanima.
Anonymous wrote:At Oakridge the kids definitely had snack time. Sometimes lunch was at 11 in the morning (that was kindergarten I think) so i don’t see how other schools could decide not to have snacks! Those poor kids.