Anonymous wrote:Did someone press a red button that activated the AU defense force? Pretty incredible series of defensive posts.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:A trade of Pleasant Pops for a CVS is a bad trade for the area. For workers and for consumers.
And CVS also has another unfair advantage over pleasant pops- most of CVS’ profit comes from their prescription drug business, and most of the goods they sell are just loss leaders.
So our messed up insurance system, which funnels profit to big health companies, also advantages CVS unfairly over local businesses.
I always thought of CVS as essentially being a large convenience store that only happens to have a pharmacy counter. And CVS stores often seem not even as clean as the average WaWa.
Anonymous wrote:A trade of Pleasant Pops for a CVS is a bad trade for the area. For workers and for consumers.
And CVS also has another unfair advantage over pleasant pops- most of CVS’ profit comes from their prescription drug business, and most of the goods they sell are just loss leaders.
So our messed up insurance system, which funnels profit to big health companies, also advantages CVS unfairly over local businesses.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:A trade of Pleasant Pops for a CVS is a bad trade for the area. For workers and for consumers.
And CVS also has another unfair advantage over pleasant pops- most of CVS’ profit comes from their prescription drug business, and most of the goods they sell are just loss leaders.
So our messed up insurance system, which funnels profit to big health companies, also advantages CVS unfairly over local businesses.
It cannot possibly be anything other than market urbanism at work.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It’s just really too bad that Pleasant Pops in particular was forced out by their landlord.
They are the epitomization of what we should want in our neighborhoods— a small business, providing a social space, serving cool unique desserts, kid-friendly, with a small play area even.
Does anyone know the Pleasant Pops owners? What we should do is lobby the landlord to restore their lease at a fair rate.
Let’s take this a step further: we can pool our money together, buy the building from the current landlord, and lease it to Pleasant Pops at a fair rate
Or we could let Pleasant Pops move keep the space for free!
Anonymous wrote:It’s just really too bad that Pleasant Pops in particular was forced out by their landlord.
They are the epitomization of what we should want in our neighborhoods— a small business, providing a social space, serving cool unique desserts, kid-friendly, with a small play area even.
Does anyone know the Pleasant Pops owners? What we should do is lobby the landlord to restore their lease at a fair rate.
Anonymous wrote:CVS needs to be boycotted and picketed until they shut down.
Anonymous wrote:A trade of Pleasant Pops for a CVS is a bad trade for the area. For workers and for consumers.
And CVS also has another unfair advantage over pleasant pops- most of CVS’ profit comes from their prescription drug business, and most of the goods they sell are just loss leaders.
So our messed up insurance system, which funnels profit to big health companies, also advantages CVS unfairly over local businesses.