Anonymous wrote:Both insurers gave a self serving conclusion. Of course your said they are totally at fault. I’d expect nothing less. Regardless, your only option is to sue. But if you already accepted money that might factor in to your right to sue.
Anonymous wrote:This is why you have insurance - so you don't have to worry about these details.
Anonymous wrote:I had posted about a month or so ago regarding being t-boned in an intersection by another driver who arrived at the intersection after I did.
She was on MY right & I was headed straight while she made a left turn thus t-boning my vehicle.
We had no witness statements nor did the Police come out to the scene even though I called them.
Basically a “He Said/She Said” situation.
Well our insurance agents took both of our statements as well as viewed photos of the damage done to both of our vehicles.
The result of the investigation:
MY insurance found the other motorist to be 💯% at fault, but the other motorist’s insurance is only admitting 50% liability on behalf of their client.
I live in CA which means that the other person’s insurance will only pay my insurance for 1/2 the cost of repairs to my vehicle plus only half of my deductible if my deductible is recovered.
I am SO angry because from the photos I submitted it is clear that my car was hit (side collision) while the other vehicle sustained only front bumper damage.
It is clear that I was going straight while the other motorist was attempting a left turn.
How can my insurance place 100 percent of the fault on the other driver while the other driver’s insurance is only admitting 50%??
How does this work….make any sense?
And is there anything that I can do now?
Anonymous wrote:If your insurance found them 100% at fault they will duke it out with their insurance