Anonymous wrote:I’ll dissent. Both sound great (the “excellent references” part is what’s key to me) and $1 an hour, assuming she works 40 hour weeks, is over $2k a year. For me, at least, we’re really stretching to pay our nanny, so I’d go with the cheaper (but clearly still great) younger nanny.
Considering whether or not she may choose to have kids soon is illegal, unethical and immoral and I would NOT let that impact my decision.
Sorry but it definitely would impact my decision if given a choice! The maternity leave alone would cripple us.
Nanny 1, OP.