Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Laughable. "Gifted" in APS is just a term. There's nothing behind it.
+1. They just say they have it to be in compliance with state law. It is a joke and pretty much nonexistent.
If it's non-existent or ineffective, did you bring this up to the RTG or the principal? I can't believe the school can go about not caring about offering gifted services, even if it's shallow compared with FCPS' AAP. What materials have your student been given?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Laughable. "Gifted" in APS is just a term. There's nothing behind it.
+1. They just say they have it to be in compliance with state law. It is a joke and pretty much nonexistent.
Anonymous wrote:Laughable. "Gifted" in APS is just a term. There's nothing behind it.
Anonymous wrote:All gifted programs have disparate racial impact.
Equity dictates they will be phased out entirely in APS.
Anonymous wrote:Our experience was similar to the other posters - daughter was informally identified as gifted in K and 1st and formally identified in 2nd. (no surprise - both parents were G&T.) Unlike FFX, APS is pretty low-key. There was some differentiated homework from her regular teachers and some time spent with the gifted teacher, but again, low-key. Part of the reason we moved out of FFX was because I wasn't super into the hysteria over AAP centers and TJ, so it works for us.
Anonymous wrote:At our school it just meant that the gifted teacher came into the classroom a few times a week to give the gifted kids specialized instruction. It doesn’t sound like much but it made DD so much happier with school, and I liked that the whole thing was really casual.